Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Therapy in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia and Adrenomyeloneuropathy
A Pilot Study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improvement of Gait in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia and Adrenomyeloneuropathy
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is the group of inherited disorders, characterized by progressive gait disturbance. There is no established therapy. Adrenoleukodystrophy (AMN) is an x-linked hereditary disease. One of its form, the adrenomyeloneuropathy has the same symptoms as HSP. Current therapeutic options for AMN are very limited. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rTMS in improving the HSP- and AMN-related gait disturbance and other symptoms with sham stimulation. Intervention will include five daily sessions. In each session 1500 magnetic pulses will be administered to each of both primary motor areas for lower extremities. Assessment of gait and of strength and spasticity of lower extremities will be made before and after therapy, as well as two weeks later.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 27, 2021
CompletedSeptember 27, 2021
August 1, 2021
2 years
October 23, 2017
February 9, 2021
August 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline Walking Time in 10 Meter Walk Test to the Measurement Taken Directly After rTMS
Change in time of walking barefoot the distance of 10 meters with maximal speed, but safely, between baseline and directly after rTMS.
Before rTMS, directly (on the same day) after rTMS
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Timed up and go Test
Baseline, directly (on the same day) after rTMS and 14 days later
Change in Medical Research Council Scale (MRC)
Baseline, directly (on the same day) after rTMS and 14 days later
Modified Ashworth Scale
Baseline, directly (on the same day) after rTMS and 14 days later
Change From Baseline Walking Time in 10 Meter Walk Test to the Measurement Taken Two Weeks After rTMS
Baseline, 14 days after rTMS
Study Arms (2)
active rTMS
EXPERIMENTAL10 hertz (Hz) rTMS will be administered over bilateral primary motor areas for the muscles of lower extremities. Therapy will include five daily sessions (on consecutive week days). In every sessions 3000 magnetic pulses of 90% of the resting motor threshold intensity will be elicited.
Sham rTMS
SHAM COMPARATORSham stimulation will mimic the active one except that the stimulating coil will be held perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as the active stimulation but prevents that significant magnetic field will reach brain tissue.
Interventions
high frequency rTMS to induce the long term potentiation of primary motor areas for the muscles of lower extremities
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Gait disturbances affecting daily activities
- Ability to walk 10 meters without assistance or with crutches or with rollator walker
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of signs or symptoms indicating other than HSP or AMN ethiology of gait disturbances
- Contraindications for rTMS as listed by the Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN 2009) i.e. seizure in the past, epilepsy, presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field, pregnancy, likelihood to get pregnant, intracranial electrodes, cardiac pacemaker or intracardiac lines, frequent syncopes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jakub Antczaklead
Study Sites (1)
Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Neurology
Krakow, 31503, Poland
Related Publications (2)
Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
PMID: 19833552RESULTAntczak J, Pera J, Dabros M, Kozminski W, Czyzycki M, Wezyk K, Dwojak M, Banach M, Slowik A. The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Symptoms in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia. Neural Plast. 2019 May 12;2019:7638675. doi: 10.1155/2019/7638675. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31214256DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limited number of sessions, which may decrease the magnitude of the therapeutic effect. The abundant pharmacotherapy with baclofen could considerably reduce observed effects on spasticity.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jakub Antczak
- Organization
- Jagiellonian University Medical College
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jakub M Antczak, MD
Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Neurology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Sham stimulation will be provided by holding the stimulating coil perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as during active stimulation but prevents significant magnetic field to reach the brain tissue.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2017
First Posted
August 13, 2018
Study Start
January 9, 2017
Primary Completion
January 1, 2019
Study Completion
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
September 27, 2021
Results First Posted
September 27, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08