NCT03892382

Brief Summary

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of central and peripheral motor neurons. ALS leads to death usually within 3 to 5 years from the onset of the symptoms. Available treatment can prolong the disease duration but cannot modify the disease course. Apathy is a frequent complication of ALS, affecting up to 30% of patients and affecting negatively the survival. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity with confirmed beneficial effect on apathy in several neurologic and psychiatric conditions. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rTMS in improving the apathy in patients with ALS with placebo stimulation.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 26, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2019

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 15, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 10, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

March 26, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 6, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisrTMSapathydepression

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version after rTMS, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.

    Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS

  • Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version first follow up, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.

    Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS

  • Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version second follow up, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS

    Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised after rTMS, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome

    Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS

  • Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised first follow up, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome

    Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS

  • Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised second follow up, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome

    Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS

  • Beck's Depression Inventory ater rTMS, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS

  • Beck's Depression Inventory first follow up, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Active rTMS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

10 hertz (Hz) rTMS will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Therapy will include 10 daily sessions (on consecutive week days). In every sessions 3000 magnetic pulses of 120% of the resting motor threshold intensity will be elicited.

Device: rTMS

Sham rTMS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham stimulation will mimic the active one except that the stimulating coil will be held perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as the active stimulation but prevents that significant magnetic field will reach brain tissue.

Device: rTMS

Interventions

rTMSDEVICE

High frequency rTMS to induce the long term potentiation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Active rTMSSham rTMS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of definite or probable ALS according to el Escorial criteria (Brooks et al. 2000)
  • Moderate or severe depression defined as the score in Beck's Depression Inventory ≥20
  • Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥26

You may not qualify if:

  • Psychiatric symptoms, which may negatively influence patient's tolerance and adherence to therapy
  • Respiratory insufficiency and other complications od advanced stages of ALS, which may compromise patient's ability to undergo the study procedure
  • Contraindications for rTMS as listed by the Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Rossi et al. 2009) i.e. seizure in the past, epilepsy, presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field, pregnancy, likelihood to get pregnant, intracranial electrodes, cardiac pacemaker or intracardiac lines, frequent syncopes

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Neurology

Krakow, 31503, Poland

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL; World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases. El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2000 Dec;1(5):293-9. doi: 10.1080/146608200300079536. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11464847BACKGROUND
  • Caga J, Hsieh S, Highton-Williamson E, Zoing MC, Ramsey E, Devenney E, Ahmed RM, Kiernan MC. Apathy and its impact on patient outcome in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol. 2018 Jan;265(1):187-193. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8688-4. Epub 2017 Nov 30.

    PMID: 29189922BACKGROUND
  • Caga J, Turner MR, Hsieh S, Ahmed RM, Devenney E, Ramsey E, Zoing MC, Mioshi E, Kiernan MC. Apathy is associated with poor prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2016 May;23(5):891-7. doi: 10.1111/ene.12959. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

    PMID: 26822417BACKGROUND
  • Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

    PMID: 25034472BACKGROUND
  • Nguyen JP, Suarez A, Kemoun G, Meignier M, Le Saout E, Damier P, Nizard J, Lefaucheur JP. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurophysiol Clin. 2017 Feb;47(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

    PMID: 28161090BACKGROUND
  • Padala PR, Padala KP, Lensing SY, Jackson AN, Hunter CR, Parkes CM, Dennis RA, Bopp MM, Caceda R, Mennemeier MS, Roberson PK, Sullivan DH. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for apathy in mild cognitive impairment: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over pilot study. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.063. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

    PMID: 29331848BACKGROUND
  • Prikryl R, Ustohal L, Prikrylova Kucerova H, Kasparek T, Venclikova S, Vrzalova M, Ceskova E. A detailed analysis of the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a double-blind trial. Schizophr Res. 2013 Sep;149(1-3):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

    PMID: 23810122BACKGROUND
  • Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.

    PMID: 19833552BACKGROUND
  • Sasaki N, Hara T, Yamada N, Niimi M, Kakuda W, Abo M. The Efficacy of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Apathy in Chronic Stroke Patients. Eur Neurol. 2017;78(1-2):28-32. doi: 10.1159/000477440. Epub 2017 Jun 3.

    PMID: 28578330BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisLethargyDepression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMotor Neuron DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesTDP-43 ProteinopathiesNeuromuscular DiseasesProteostasis DeficienciesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Jakub M Antczak, MD

    Department of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Medical College

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Sham stimulation will be provided by holding the stimulating coil perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as during active stimulation but prevents significant magnetic field to reach the brain tissue.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients will be randomly assigned to real or placebo (sham) stimulation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2019

First Posted

March 27, 2019

Study Start

November 15, 2019

Primary Completion

June 30, 2021

Study Completion

December 31, 2021

Last Updated

February 10, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

After completing the study, the details of neurophysiologic diagnostics including motor threshold, the age and gender as well as individual scores of Mini-Mental State Examination, AES-C, Beck's Depression Inventory and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised will be made available to other researchers on request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
The data will become available after the study is published.
Access Criteria
On request send by e-mail: jantczak@cm-uj.krakow.pl

Locations