The Effects of Lidocaine and Esmolol on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Orotracheal Intubation
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study aims to compare the hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation using continuous infusion of lidocaine and esmolol in patients undergoing general anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jul 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2019
CompletedMay 29, 2019
May 1, 2019
1.1 years
July 25, 2018
May 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with tachycardia after intubation
Analysis of the incidence of tachycardia after intubation
12 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability
12 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Esmolol Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive esmolol during induction of anesthesia
Lidocaine Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive lidocaine during induction of anesthesia
Interventions
Esmolol group (EG) will receive a bolus of esmolol 1.5mg / kg in 10 min following by continuous infusion at a rate of 0.1mg / kg / min.
Lidocaine (LG) group will received lidocaine bolus of 1.5mg / kg in 10 min following by continuous infusion at a rate of 1.5mg / kg / h.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 18 and 70 years
- Physical State 1, 2 or 3 of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA)
- Electively or urgently scheduled for surgery requiring general anesthesia, with programming of orotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy at the Base Hospital of the Federal District.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 18 and over 70 years of age
- Patients with contraindications or history of hypersensitivity to the drugs involved in the study
- Patients with coronary ischemic disease
- Patients with atrioventricular block at any grade
- Patients with diagnosed cardiac arrhythmias
- Patients with heart failure
- Patients who are beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers
- Patients with renal insufficiency of any kind
- Patients with difficulty predicting orotracheal intubation
- Patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg / m²
- Patients who underwent neuroaxis block before anesthetic induction
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study after submitting the informed consent form
- Patients requiring two or more attempts of laryngoscopy for positioning of the orotracheal tube
- Patients with asthma
- Any other condition that, in the opinion of the researcher, may pose a risk to the patient or interfere with the objectives of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospital de Baselead
Study Sites (1)
Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal
Brasília, Federal District, 70680250, Brazil
Related Publications (2)
Singh S, Laing EF, Owiredu WK, Singh A. Comparison of esmolol and lidocaine for attenuation of cardiovascular stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in a Ghanaian population. Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Jan-Apr;7(1):83-8. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.114008.
PMID: 25885726BACKGROUNDMendonca FT, de Queiroz LM, Guimaraes CC, Xavier AC. Effects of lidocaine and magnesium sulfate in attenuating hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;67(1):50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.08.004. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
PMID: 28017170BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Preceptor of Medical Residency in Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2018
First Posted
August 2, 2018
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
July 31, 2019
Study Completion
July 31, 2019
Last Updated
May 29, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05