Study Stopped
Suspended to recruitment following TSC review on efficacy and toxicities
Acelarin First Line Randomised Pancreatic Study
ACELARATE
A Phase III, Open Label, Multicentre Randomised Clinical Study Comparing Acelarin (NUC-1031) With Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma
1 other identifier
interventional
328
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to assess whether Acelarin (NUC-1031) is superior to gemcitabine in terms of overall survival for treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. In addition disease progression, quality of life and comparative safety will be evaluated. Secondary objectives are to compare between the two treatment groups the following:
- Progression Free Survival (PFS)
- Radiological Response and disease control rate
- Toxicity and safety
- Quality of Life Additional, exploratory objectives are to discover and validate possible biomarkers to predict additional benefit of Acelarin (NUC-1031) over gemcitabine alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 29, 2019
May 1, 2019
4.8 years
September 27, 2016
October 27, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants that have survived throughout treatment and also into follow-up, as measured by the primary cause of death and date of death CRFs.
4 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of participants that survive progression-free and for how long, as assessed by 12-weekly CT scan assessments per RECIST v1.1 and end of study CRF to capture the reasons for coming off study.
4 years
Number of participants that show an objective response, as demonstrated by 12-weekly CT scan assessments per RECIST v1.1.
4 years
Number of participants deemed to have disease control, as demonstrated by 12-weekly CT scan assessments per RECIST v1.1.
4 years
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.03. Toxicity is assessed by CTCAE v4.03 alongside Quality of Life Questionnaires, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26.
4 years
Other Outcomes (1)
Discovery of possible biomarkers which may predict any additional benefit of Acelarin over gemcitabine. These will be assessed from plasma, cell pellet and serum samples collected from participants throughout the trial.
4 years
Study Arms (2)
Acelarin (NUC-1031)
EXPERIMENTAL825 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 15 to 30 minutes on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Patients will be seen on a weekly basis during the time they are on active treatment and will be treated until disease progression.
Gemcitabine
ACTIVE COMPARATORGemcitabine: 1000mg/m2 administered intravenously as a 30 minute infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Patients will be seen on a weekly basis during the time they are on active treatment and will be treated until disease progression.
Interventions
825 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 15 to 30 minutes on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Number of Cycles: until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity develops.
1000 mg/m2 administered intravenously as a 30 minute infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Number of Cycles: until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity develops.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Histologically or cytologically proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas.
- Metastatic disease precluding curative surgical resection or definitive locally directed therapies such as chemo radiation. Patients who have relapsed following previously resected pancreatic cancer can be included.
- Contrast enhanced computerised tomography (CT) scan of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis within 28 days prior to commencing treatment.
- Unidimensionally measurable disease.
- ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2 where combination chemotherapy is not deemed appropriate or is declined by the patient.
- Platelets ≥100 x 109/l; WBC ≥ 3 x 109/l; neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 109/l at entry.
- Documented life expectancy \> 3 months.
- Informed written consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Laboratory results:
- Serum bilirubin ≥ 1.5x the upper limit of reference range (ULRR).
- Haemoglobin \< 10G/dl.
- Creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/minute (calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula).
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>2.5 x ULN or \> 5x ULN if judged by the investigator to be related to liver metastases.
- Medical or psychiatric conditions compromising informed consent.
- Intracerebral metastases or meningeal carcinomatosis.
- Evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease or any concurrent condition which in the Investigator's opinion makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study or which would jeopardize compliance with the protocol.
- Pregnancy or breast feeding.
- Previous chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer will be permitted provided that chemotherapy was completed \> 12 months previously.
- Radiotherapy within the last 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment.
- Concurrent malignancies or invasive cancers diagnosed within past 5 years except for adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin, in situ carcinoma of the uterine cervix or resected pancreatic cancer.
- Hypersensitivity to gemcitabine or any of the excipients of gemcitabine or Acelarin (NUC-1031).
- All men or women of reproductive potential, unless using at least two contraceptive precautions, one of which must be from the list below, the other must be a condom\* or abstaining from sexual intercourse, until six months after treatment has ended:
- Combined (oestrogen and progesterone containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: either oral, intravaginal or transdermal.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trustlead
- Cancer Research UKcollaborator
- University of Liverpoolcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit
Liverpool, Merseyside, L69 3GL, United Kingdom
Related Publications (13)
Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff P, Nelson R, Dorr FA, Stephens CD, Von Hoff DD. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2403-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2403.
PMID: 9196156BACKGROUNDConroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Pere-Verge D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M; Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923.
PMID: 21561347BACKGROUNDVon Hoff DD, Ervin TJ, Arena FP, et al: "Randomized phase III study of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (MPACT)". 2013 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 4; abstract: LBA148)
BACKGROUNDGhazaly, E.A. et al. "ProGem1: Phase I first-in-human study of the novel nucleotide NUC-1031 in adult patients with advanced solid tumors" J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 2576)
BACKGROUNDde Sousa Cavalcante L, Monteiro G. Gemcitabine: metabolism and molecular mechanisms of action, sensitivity and chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014 Oct 15;741:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.041. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
PMID: 25084222BACKGROUNDAchiwa H, Oguri T, Sato S, Maeda H, Niimi T, Ueda R. Determinants of sensitivity and resistance to gemcitabine: the roles of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 and deoxycytidine kinase in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2004 Sep;95(9):753-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb03257.x.
PMID: 15471562BACKGROUNDSpratlin J, Sangha R, Glubrecht D, Dabbagh L, Young JD, Dumontet C, Cass C, Lai R, Mackey JR. The absence of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 is associated with reduced survival in patients with gemcitabine-treated pancreas adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Oct 15;10(20):6956-61. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0224.
PMID: 15501974BACKGROUNDGhazaly, E.A. et al. "ProGem1: A phase I/II study of a first-in-class nucleotide, Acelarin, in patients with advanced solid tumors" J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 2531)
BACKGROUNDSebastiani V, Ricci F, Rubio-Viqueira B, Kulesza P, Yeo CJ, Hidalgo M, Klein A, Laheru D, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA. Immunohistochemical and genetic evaluation of deoxycytidine kinase in pancreatic cancer: relationship to molecular mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance and survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Apr 15;12(8):2492-7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2655.
PMID: 16638857BACKGROUNDKroep JR, van Moorsel CJ, Veerman G, Voorn DA, Schultz RM, Worzalla JF, Tanzer LR, Merriman RL, Pinedo HM, Peters GJ. Role of deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), thymidine kinase 2 (TK2), and deoxycytidine deaminase (dCDA) in the antitumor activity of gemcitabine (dFdC). Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;431:657-60. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5381-6_127. No abstract available.
PMID: 9598147BACKGROUNDPhilip PA, Chansky K, LeBlanc M, Rubinstein L, Seymour L, Ivy SP, Alberts SR, Catalano PJ, Crowley J. Historical controls for metastatic pancreatic cancer: benchmarks for planning and analyzing single-arm phase II trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Aug 15;20(16):4176-85. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2024. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
PMID: 24914040BACKGROUNDSlusarczyk M, Lopez MH, Balzarini J, Mason M, Jiang WG, Blagden S, Thompson E, Ghazaly E, McGuigan C. Application of ProTide technology to gemcitabine: a successful approach to overcome the key cancer resistance mechanisms leads to a new agent (NUC-1031) in clinical development. J Med Chem. 2014 Feb 27;57(4):1531-42. doi: 10.1021/jm401853a. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
PMID: 24471998BACKGROUNDMoore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, Figer A, Hecht JR, Gallinger S, Au HJ, Murawa P, Walde D, Wolff RA, Campos D, Lim R, Ding K, Clark G, Voskoglou-Nomikos T, Ptasynski M, Parulekar W; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):1960-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.9525. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
PMID: 17452677BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel H Palmer, BSC, PhD
University of Liverpool
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2016
First Posted
August 1, 2018
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 29, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05