NCT03587935

Brief Summary

Colonoscopy is the considered gold standard for diagnosing diseases in the colon. A colonoscopy is normally divided into the insertion from anus to cecum, the technical difficult part, and a retraction or diagnostic part. No objective measure exists to evaluate the performance of a colonoscopy. Based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope we wish to seek evidence for an automated and objective system able to differentiate between endoscopists with various experience in a clinical setting. The movement analysis is based on information's from the colonoscope. Electromagnetic coils are built in along the length of colonoscopes. They generate a pulsed magnetic field that is picked up a receiver coil. The data-points for each coil are inserted into an algorithm for the movement analyzing. This analysis is done as a change between the tip of the scope, and the next tracked magnetic coil. The result is a relative movement of the colonoscope in relation to the previous position. The study is conducted a three different University Hospitals in Denmark. Twenty physicians with experience in colonoscopy are voluntary included. Patients appointed to a screening colonoscopy are included and a minimum of five consecutive colonoscopies are recorded for each physician. We predict the system to be automated and objective tool correlated with the physician's technical level of expertise in clinical colonoscopy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
9

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 3, 2018

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 12, 2018

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 16, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 20, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 20, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

April 16, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

July 3, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 13, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Colon AdenomaColon PolypAdenoma detection rateMagnetic Endoscopy Imaging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score

    The score is based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope from anus until max insertion(cecum). It is scaled from 0-1000 .A score of zero equals an incomplete procedure and a score of 1 is a very poor score but the cecum was reached. Increasing score represents better technical performance with a maximum score of 1000.

    8 months

  • 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score

    The score is based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope from cecum to the anus. It is scaled from 0-1000. A score of zero equals a very poor score, Increasing score represents better technical performance with a maximum score of 1000

    8 months

Interventions

The score is based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope from anus until max insertion(cecum). It is scaled from 0-1000. A score of zero equals an incomplete procedure and a score of 1 is a very poor score but the cecum was reached. Increasing score represents better technical performance with a maximum score of 1000.

Also known as: 3D-CoPS

The score is based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope from cecum to the anus. It is scaled from 0-1000. A score of zero equals a very poor score, Increasing score represents better technical performance with a maximum score of 1000.

Also known as: 3D-CoRS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Colorectal cancer screening in Denmark involves citizens in the age from 50 to 74, who is invited to volunteerly participate in screening for bowel cancer. In the course of four years (2014-2017) every person in the age group will get an invitationto the screening program. From 2018 and onwards people aged 50-74 will be invited every second year. All participants take the hemocult test and if the test is positive they will be appointed to a screening colonoscopy.

You may qualify if:

  • Physicians or nurses with a lfetime experience of more than 50 screenings colonoscopies.
  • Patients appointed to a screenings colonoscopy according to the danish screening program for colorectal cancer.

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Copenhagen Acedemy of Medical Education and Simulation

Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Vilmann AS, Svendsen MBS, Lachenmeier C, Sondergaard B, Vilmann P, Park YS, Svendsen LB, Konge L. Colonoscope retraction technique and predicting adenoma detection rate: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 May;95(5):1002-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.026. Epub 2022 Jan 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic Polyps

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal PolypsPolypsPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Lars Konge, Prof

    CAMES-Rigshospitalet

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator Andreas Slot Vilmann

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2018

First Posted

July 16, 2018

Study Start

July 12, 2018

Primary Completion

January 20, 2019

Study Completion

February 20, 2019

Last Updated

April 16, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations