A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of BLI4700 Bowel Prep Versus an FDA-approved Comparator in Adults Prior to Colonoscopy
BLI4700-301: A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of BLI4700 Bowel Preparation Versus an FDA-approved Comparator in Adult Subjects Prior to Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
620
1 country
23
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of BLI4700 bowel preparation to an FDA-approved bowel preparation as 2-day, split-dose bowel preparations prior to colonoscopy in adult patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jan 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 8, 2021
CompletedSeptember 8, 2021
May 1, 2021
6 months
January 12, 2018
May 4, 2021
August 12, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Successful Bowel Cleansing
% of subjects with successful bowel preparation rated by colonoscopist on a 4 point scale (1=poor to 4=excellent)
Day of colonoscopy
Other Outcomes (4)
Abdominal Distension (Solicited Reports)
2 days
Abdominal Pain (Solicited Reports)
2 days
Nausea (Solicited Reports)
2 days
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
BLI4700 Bowel Preparation
EXPERIMENTALFDA Approved Bowel Preparation
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female outpatients who are undergoing colonoscopy for a routinely accepted indication.
- to 85 years of age (inclusive)
- If female, and of child-bearing potential, is using an acceptable form of birth control
- Negative serum pregnancy test at screening, if applicable
- In the Investigator's judgment, subject is mentally competent to provide informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with known or suspected ileus, gastrointestinal obstruction, gastroparesis, gastric retention, bowel perforation, toxic colitis or megacolon.
- Subjects with ongoing severe, acute inflammatory bowel disease
- Subjects who had previous significant gastrointestinal surgeries.
- Subjects with uncontrolled pre-existing electrolyte abnormalities, or those with clinically significant electrolyte abnormalities based on Visit 1 laboratory results.
- Subjects with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \> 170 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \> 100 mmHg).
- Subjects taking antibiotics within 7 days of colonoscopy.
- Subjects with severe renal insufficiency (GFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73m2).
- Subjects with known severe hepatic insufficiency (Child Pugh C)
- Subjects with cardiac insufficiency (NYHA Functional Classifications 3 or 4).
- Subjects with an abnormal and clinically significant physical examination or ECG finding at Visit 1.
- Subjects undergoing insulin therapy for any indication.
- Subjects with impaired consciousness that predisposes them to pulmonary aspiration.
- Subjects undergoing colonoscopy for foreign body removal and/or decompression.
- Subjects who are pregnant or lactating, or intending to become pregnant during the study.
- Subjects of childbearing potential who refuse a pregnancy test.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (23)
Braintree Research Site 212
Mobile, Alabama, 36688, United States
Braintree Research Site 204
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Braintree Research Site 209
Anaheim, California, 92801, United States
Braintree Research Site 219
Chula Vista, California, 91910, United States
Braintree Research Site 206
Los Angeles, California, 90045, United States
Braintree Research Site 220
San Diego, California, 92114, United States
Braintree Research Site 221
Inverness, Florida, 34452, United States
Braintree Research Site 222
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216, United States
Braintree Research Site 201
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684, United States
Braintree Research Site 224
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Braintree Research Site 215
Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States
Braintree Research Site 223
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70601, United States
Braintree Research Site 211
Monroe, Louisiana, 71201, United States
Braintree Research Site 207
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21742, United States
Braintree Research Site 218
Flowood, Mississippi, 39232, United States
Braintree Research Site 210
Great Neck, New York, 11023, United States
Braintree Research Site 214
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Braintree Research Site 213
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
Braintree Research Site 216
Columbia, South Carolina, 29203, United States
Braintree Research Site 202
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067, United States
Braintree Research Site 203
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305, United States
Braintree Research Site 217
Ogden, Utah, 84405, United States
Braintree Research Site 208
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215, United States
Related Publications (1)
Di Palma JA, Bhandari R, Cleveland MV, Mishkin DS, Tesoriero J, Hall S, McGowan J. A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of a New Sulfate-Based Tablet Bowel Preparation Versus a PEG and Ascorbate Comparator in Adult Subjects Undergoing Colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 1;116(2):319-328. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001020.
PMID: 33165006DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of R&D, Gastroenterology
- Organization
- Braintree Laboratories, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
John McGowan, MPH
Braintree Laboratories, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2018
First Posted
January 19, 2018
Study Start
January 11, 2018
Primary Completion
July 10, 2018
Study Completion
July 10, 2018
Last Updated
September 8, 2021
Results First Posted
September 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05