NCT03587818

Brief Summary

An overarching aim is to create prerequisites for person-centred information and communication. The specific aim is to evaluate if an intervention with a written information and communication support tool and person-centred dialogues can increase patients' health-related quality of life and preparedness and well-being pre-surgery and during recovery in connection to colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Further, the aim is to explain variations in patients' recovery trajectories during the six months following CRC surgery in order to identify particularly vulnerable sub-groups of patients. The hypothesis is that person-centred information and communication supported by an interactive patient information and education material (PEM) for patients undergoing CRC surgery will lead to improved preparedness for surgery and recovery during recovery 6 months following surgery. Secondary outcomes were decreased length of stay at hospital in relation to surgery, changed behaviour pertaining when and how to seek health care for recovery support, and improved emotional, role and social function, general health status and distress. The study is performed at three surgical departments in Sweden. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods will be applied. The project started with analysis of existing patient written information and education materials aimed for the patient group at Swedish surgical departments and analyses of conversations between patients and providers in consultations occurring over time before and following surgery. These results provided the basis for the development of the person-centred communication intervention developed in collaboration between people who had undergone CRC surgery, professionals from CRC surgery clinics and researchers with expertise in patient education, person-centred care and CRC surgery. The design is quasi-experimental and longitudinal. Patients are consecutively sampled. Types of data:

  • patient reported answers in validated questionnaires
  • information about diagnosis, type of treatments and course of care obtained from patients' records
  • recorded consultation conversations with patients between patients and health care providers
  • narrative interviews with patients 6 months following discharge regarding their recovery after surgery
  • focus group discussions and individual interviews with professionals regarding how they have perceived using the intervention and how it has functioned.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
488

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2012

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2016

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 25, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 16, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

July 16, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

April 25, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 3, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Patient-Centered CareHealth CommunicationClinical trialColorectal neoplasmsColorectal surgeryContinuity of patient careMedical-surgical nursingQualitative Research

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Longitudinal Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire (PCSQ)

    measures change in preparedness for surgery and recovery over time in four domains: (i) searching for and making use of information (4 items), (ii) understanding and involvement in the care process (7 items), (iii) making sense of the recovery process (5 items), and (iv) support and access to medical care (7 items)

    six months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0

    (1) before surgery, (2) six weeks after surgery, (3) three months after surgery and (4) six months after surgery

  • The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCS) Distress Thermometer (DT; Version 1.2013).

    (1) before surgery, (2) one week after surgery, (3) six weeks after surgery, (4) three months after surgery and (5) six months after surgery

  • The Daily Coping Assessment instrument

    (1) one week after surgery and (2) six weeks after surgery.

  • Communication in consultations

    Pre-surgery

  • Patients experience of the recovery process

    6 months following surgery

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Conventional care. Patients were receiving several written patient education materials (PEMs), mostly related to specific parts or procedures related to the surgery and the recovery. Communication between patients and professionals during consultations occurred according to conventional care practice.

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

I. Written interactive PEM structured into chapters/phases of the care process. Designed to serve three purposes: 1. generic information of the surgery and recovery process on a group level to promote high readability, suitability and comprehensibility 2. arena of dialogues between patient and professionals; voicing concerns, share perspectives 3. for the patient to personally reflect on generic information. II. Person-centred communication in dialogues using the PEM as a supportive tool, facilitated by four communication strategies: 1. professionals guiding the patient through the care process 2. communicating an introduction, agenda and closing 3. being sensitive to the patient's questions, beliefs, experiences and resources 4. dialogue based on story, posing open-ended questions, and following up.

Other: person-centred communication

Interventions

The intervention aimed to actively make use of a person-centred approach to support patients undergoing CRC surgery to be prepared for surgery, discharge and recovery in relation to CRC. This was accomplished through person-centred communication, which was based on a standardized dialogue tool with tailored written information material (component I), in combination with an approach for professionals to facilitate person-centred communication (component II) in consultations.

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • undergoing planned surgery for cancer in colon or rectum

You may not qualify if:

  • receiving preoperative chemotherapy
  • receiving long-term preoperative radiation
  • diagnosed metastasis
  • post-surgical diagnosis of benign tumors
  • undergoing emergency surgery
  • having reduced cognitive function
  • lacking ability to communicate in Swedish

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (9)

  • Smith F, Carlsson E, Kokkinakis D, Forsberg M, Kodeda K, Sawatzky R, Friberg F, Ohlen J. Readability, suitability and comprehensibility in patient education materials for Swedish patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery: a mixed method design. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

  • Oresland S, Friberg F, Maatta S, Ohlen J. Disclosing discourses: biomedical and hospitality discourses in patient education materials. Nurs Inq. 2015 Sep;22(3):240-8. doi: 10.1111/nin.12097. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

  • Carlsson E, Pettersson M, Hyden LC, Ohlen J, Friberg F. Structure and content in consultations with patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):820-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

  • Pettersson ME, Ohlen J, Friberg F, Hyden LC, Carlsson E. Topics and structure in preoperative nursing consultations with patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Dec;31(4):674-686. doi: 10.1111/scs.12378. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

  • Friberg F, Liden E, Hakanson C, Ohlen J. Communicating bodily changes: physicians' ways of enabling patient understanding in gastrointestinal cancer consultations. Palliat Support Care. 2015 Jun;13(3):661-71. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514000352. Epub 2014 May 2.

  • Carlsson E, Pettersson M, Ohlen J, Sawatzky R, Smith F, Friberg F. Development and validation of the preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire: PCSQ-pre 24. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Dec;25:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

  • Sawatzky R, Russell L, Friberg F, Carlsson EK, Pettersson M, Ohlen J. Longitudinal person-centered measurement: A psychometric evaluation of the Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire (PCSQ). Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):827-835. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

  • Smith F, Ohlen J, Persson LO, Carlsson E. Daily Assessment of Stressful events and Coping in early post-operative recovery after colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12829. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12829. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

  • Smith F, Wallengren Gustafsson C & Öhlén J. (2017) Participatory design in education materials in health care context. Action Research 15(3), 310-336.

    RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Joakim Öhlén, PhD

    Göteborg University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: A before and after design was performed; the control group were included from November 2012 to January 2014. This was followed by introducing the intervention to the clinicians, and the intervention group were included from March 2014 to June 2015. Patients were assigned consecutively at the three hospitals. No blinding was applied.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2018

First Posted

July 16, 2018

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion

December 30, 2015

Study Completion

April 30, 2016

Last Updated

July 16, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-07