Person-Centred Information and Communication for Patients Undergoing Colo-Rectal Surgery - the PINCORE Project
PINCORE
1 other identifier
interventional
488
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
An overarching aim is to create prerequisites for person-centred information and communication. The specific aim is to evaluate if an intervention with a written information and communication support tool and person-centred dialogues can increase patients' health-related quality of life and preparedness and well-being pre-surgery and during recovery in connection to colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Further, the aim is to explain variations in patients' recovery trajectories during the six months following CRC surgery in order to identify particularly vulnerable sub-groups of patients. The hypothesis is that person-centred information and communication supported by an interactive patient information and education material (PEM) for patients undergoing CRC surgery will lead to improved preparedness for surgery and recovery during recovery 6 months following surgery. Secondary outcomes were decreased length of stay at hospital in relation to surgery, changed behaviour pertaining when and how to seek health care for recovery support, and improved emotional, role and social function, general health status and distress. The study is performed at three surgical departments in Sweden. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods will be applied. The project started with analysis of existing patient written information and education materials aimed for the patient group at Swedish surgical departments and analyses of conversations between patients and providers in consultations occurring over time before and following surgery. These results provided the basis for the development of the person-centred communication intervention developed in collaboration between people who had undergone CRC surgery, professionals from CRC surgery clinics and researchers with expertise in patient education, person-centred care and CRC surgery. The design is quasi-experimental and longitudinal. Patients are consecutively sampled. Types of data:
- patient reported answers in validated questionnaires
- information about diagnosis, type of treatments and course of care obtained from patients' records
- recorded consultation conversations with patients between patients and health care providers
- narrative interviews with patients 6 months following discharge regarding their recovery after surgery
- focus group discussions and individual interviews with professionals regarding how they have perceived using the intervention and how it has functioned.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2018
CompletedJuly 16, 2018
July 1, 2018
3.2 years
April 25, 2018
July 3, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Longitudinal Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire (PCSQ)
measures change in preparedness for surgery and recovery over time in four domains: (i) searching for and making use of information (4 items), (ii) understanding and involvement in the care process (7 items), (iii) making sense of the recovery process (5 items), and (iv) support and access to medical care (7 items)
six months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (9)
EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0
(1) before surgery, (2) six weeks after surgery, (3) three months after surgery and (4) six months after surgery
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCS) Distress Thermometer (DT; Version 1.2013).
(1) before surgery, (2) one week after surgery, (3) six weeks after surgery, (4) three months after surgery and (5) six months after surgery
The Daily Coping Assessment instrument
(1) one week after surgery and (2) six weeks after surgery.
Communication in consultations
Pre-surgery
Patients experience of the recovery process
6 months following surgery
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONConventional care. Patients were receiving several written patient education materials (PEMs), mostly related to specific parts or procedures related to the surgery and the recovery. Communication between patients and professionals during consultations occurred according to conventional care practice.
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALI. Written interactive PEM structured into chapters/phases of the care process. Designed to serve three purposes: 1. generic information of the surgery and recovery process on a group level to promote high readability, suitability and comprehensibility 2. arena of dialogues between patient and professionals; voicing concerns, share perspectives 3. for the patient to personally reflect on generic information. II. Person-centred communication in dialogues using the PEM as a supportive tool, facilitated by four communication strategies: 1. professionals guiding the patient through the care process 2. communicating an introduction, agenda and closing 3. being sensitive to the patient's questions, beliefs, experiences and resources 4. dialogue based on story, posing open-ended questions, and following up.
Interventions
The intervention aimed to actively make use of a person-centred approach to support patients undergoing CRC surgery to be prepared for surgery, discharge and recovery in relation to CRC. This was accomplished through person-centred communication, which was based on a standardized dialogue tool with tailored written information material (component I), in combination with an approach for professionals to facilitate person-centred communication (component II) in consultations.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- undergoing planned surgery for cancer in colon or rectum
You may not qualify if:
- receiving preoperative chemotherapy
- receiving long-term preoperative radiation
- diagnosed metastasis
- post-surgical diagnosis of benign tumors
- undergoing emergency surgery
- having reduced cognitive function
- lacking ability to communicate in Swedish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (9)
Smith F, Carlsson E, Kokkinakis D, Forsberg M, Kodeda K, Sawatzky R, Friberg F, Ohlen J. Readability, suitability and comprehensibility in patient education materials for Swedish patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery: a mixed method design. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
PMID: 24290242RESULTOresland S, Friberg F, Maatta S, Ohlen J. Disclosing discourses: biomedical and hospitality discourses in patient education materials. Nurs Inq. 2015 Sep;22(3):240-8. doi: 10.1111/nin.12097. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
PMID: 25847051RESULTCarlsson E, Pettersson M, Hyden LC, Ohlen J, Friberg F. Structure and content in consultations with patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):820-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
PMID: 24012188RESULTPettersson ME, Ohlen J, Friberg F, Hyden LC, Carlsson E. Topics and structure in preoperative nursing consultations with patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Dec;31(4):674-686. doi: 10.1111/scs.12378. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
PMID: 27859450RESULTFriberg F, Liden E, Hakanson C, Ohlen J. Communicating bodily changes: physicians' ways of enabling patient understanding in gastrointestinal cancer consultations. Palliat Support Care. 2015 Jun;13(3):661-71. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514000352. Epub 2014 May 2.
PMID: 24784141RESULTCarlsson E, Pettersson M, Ohlen J, Sawatzky R, Smith F, Friberg F. Development and validation of the preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire: PCSQ-pre 24. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Dec;25:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
PMID: 27865249RESULTSawatzky R, Russell L, Friberg F, Carlsson EK, Pettersson M, Ohlen J. Longitudinal person-centered measurement: A psychometric evaluation of the Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire (PCSQ). Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):827-835. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
PMID: 27955903RESULTSmith F, Ohlen J, Persson LO, Carlsson E. Daily Assessment of Stressful events and Coping in early post-operative recovery after colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12829. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12829. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
PMID: 29363821RESULTSmith F, Wallengren Gustafsson C & Öhlén J. (2017) Participatory design in education materials in health care context. Action Research 15(3), 310-336.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joakim Öhlén, PhD
Göteborg University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2018
First Posted
July 16, 2018
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 30, 2015
Study Completion
April 30, 2016
Last Updated
July 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07