Fujifilm Feature Comparison Reader Study to Compare Old vs New Processing
A Feature Comparison Study to Evaluate the Modified Processing of Fujifilm's ASPIRE Cristalle With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Option as Compared to the Original Processing
1 other identifier
observational
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the feature comparison study is to evaluate general mammographic features in images of the same breast when reconstructed with modified (ISR and DVIIm) processing as compared to the original processing (FBP with EDR and MFP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 19, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 20, 2020
CompletedSeptember 21, 2023
September 1, 2023
Same day
July 2, 2018
April 17, 2020
September 15, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of ISR (Modified Processing) to FBP (Original Processing)
For each reader, the cases judged as non-inferior with modified processing will be calculated for each feature and each view. Non-inferiority will be defined as a score of equivalence between modified and original or a score indicating the modified image processing is superior. Readers compared several general mammographic features using the following 5-point scale: negative 2 (left image much superior) negative 1 (left image somewhat superior) 0 (left and right images are equivalent) positive 1 (right image somewhat superior) positive 2 (right image much superior)
1 day reading session
Study Arms (2)
FBP (old processing)
Filtered back projection; old processing.
ISR (new processing)
Iterative super resolution; new processing.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
600
You may qualify if:
- Female subjects participating in FMSU2013-004A protocol with known clinical status
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects that did not have known clinical status in FMSU2013-004A
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.lead
- International HealthCare, LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
International HealthCare, LLC
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06851, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Randy Vader
- Organization
- Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Susan Crennan
Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2018
First Posted
July 13, 2018
Study Start
June 30, 2018
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Study Completion
November 19, 2018
Last Updated
September 21, 2023
Results First Posted
May 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share