An Intervention to Reduce Discrepancy in Everyday Preferences
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dementia is a disabling, progressive major neurocognitive disorder. Although cognitive symptoms drive the diagnosis of dementia, neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), such as depression, agitation/aggression, and psychosis, are common and associated with a number of significant adverse outcomes. There are currently extremely limited FDA (Food and Drug Administration)-approved treatments for NPS of dementia; there remains a critical need for safe and effective interventions for NPS that can be easily administered and monitored in typical clinical settings. As cognitive impairment progresses, persons living with dementia or cognitive impairment (PLWD/CI) increasingly rely on surrogate decision-makers, such that the quality of life for PLWD/CI is directly impacted by the decisions made by a surrogate. Discrepancy between preferences of PLWD/CI and proxy assessments by surrogate decision-makers is common. Our previous work has shown that such discrepancies in everyday preferences are associated with a higher burden of NPS for PLWD/CI. We hypothesize that discrepancy in everyday preferences assessment between PLWD/CI and care partners creates a set of "unmet needs" that increase the likelihood or severity of NPS; our preliminary data support this model of unmet needs as drivers of NPS. Specifically, as the neurodegenerative process disrupts the ability of PLWD/CI not only to provide for their own needs but also to communicate needs and preferences effectively to others, NPS may emerge in response. Thus, our hypothesis fits within a larger conceptual framework for understanding etiology of NPS: i.e., the mismatch between personality habits, physical/mental states, and environmental factors drive NPS as a means to resolve or communicate unmet needs. Building from this conceptual framework and our own preliminary data, the proposed pilot project addresses major gaps in the availability of safe, effective, and accessible strategies to reduce NPS by developing and testing the feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and mechanistic target engagement of a templated, clinician-facilitated intervention to align everyday living preferences assessment between PLWD/CI and their care partners (n=20 dyads) to reduce NPS. The study is unique in developing a bioethics-driven intervention for NPS that is effective, portable, and easily transferrable to diverse settings. The crux of this intervention is meeting the needs of PLWD/CI by aligning everyday decision-making with priorities that matter most.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2028
June 5, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.9 years
June 23, 2018
June 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Discrepancy score
To calculate a discrepancy score for each dyad (i.e., PLWD/CI and care partner), a mean domain score for both assessments PEL-CI and PELI-CP will be calculated as the average of all non-missing data for each assessment. The discrepancy score will then be obtained by subtracting the mean domain score for assessment PELI-CP from the mean domain score for assessment PELI-CI for each dyad.
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
NPI-Q
8 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Templated, clinician-facilitated intervention to align everyday living preferences assessment
EXPERIMENTALIn step 1, persons living with dementia or cognitive impairment (PLWD/CI) will complete the PELI (hereafter, "assessment PELI-CI" for Cognitive Impairment) to articulate their preferences. In step 2, care partners will consider the preferences of PLWD/CI; care partners will complete concurrent but separate proxy PELI assessments from the perspective of the PLWD/CI (i.e., as if acting as surrogate decision-makers; hereafter "assessment PELI-CP" for Care Partner). In the Intervention (step 3), the study clinician will ask the PLWD/CI to identify up to 3 "social engagement" preferences that matter most to them. Second, in discussion with the PLWD/CI and care partner, the study clinician will review areas where there is a difference in ratings between the PELI-CI and PELI-CP. The study clinician will then ask the PLWD/CI to identify up to 3 items of disagreement that are most important for the care partner to know about. A 1-page Preferences Priorities document will then be created.
Interventions
In step 1, persons living with dementia or cognitive impairment (PLWD/CI) will complete the PELI (hereafter, "assessment PELI-CI" for Cognitive Impairment) to articulate their preferences. In step 2, care partners will consider the preferences of PLWD/CI; care partners will complete concurrent but separate proxy PELI assessments from the perspective of the PLWD/CI (i.e., as if acting as surrogate decision-makers; hereafter "assessment PELI-CP" for Care Partner). In the Intervention (step 3), the study clinician will ask the PLWD/CI to identify up to 3 "social engagement" preferences that matter most to them. Second, in discussion with the PLWD/CI and care partner, the study clinician will review areas where there is a difference in ratings between the PELI-CI and PELI-CP. The study clinician will then ask the PLWD/CI to identify up to 3 items of disagreement that are most important for the care partner to know about. A 1-page Preferences Priorities document will then be created.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mclean Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
McLean Hospital
Belmont, Massachusetts, 02478, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Wilkins, MD, DPhil
Mclean Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Medical Director, Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Program
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2018
First Posted
July 5, 2018
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Last Updated
June 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share