NCT03566095

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of coaching and Voices for Food materials on establishing Food Policy Councils (FPCs) and using guided client choice in rural food pantries to improve food security and diet quality among food pantry clients, and to improve the food environment in rural, midwestern food pantries. Half of the communities received coaching and the Voices for Food kit, the other half only received the Voices for Food kit.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,735

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2014

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 15, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 15, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2018

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

June 21, 2018

Status Verified

June 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

May 24, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 20, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

RuralFood Policy CouncilsFood PantryCommunity Coaching

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • The United States Household Food Security Survey Module

    Change in food security of food pantry clients. Individuals will be classified as very low food secure, low food secure, marginal food secure and high food secure.

    4 years

  • Healthy Eating Index (HEI) Score

    Change in diet quality of food pantry clients. The Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24®) Dietary Assessment Too allows for calculation of the Healthy Eating Index score, which is a measure of diet quality.

    4 years

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Food Policy Council Implementation Form

    4 years

  • Food Pantry MyChoice Observation Tool

    4 years

Study Arms (2)

Coaching and Voices for Food Kit

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The treatment communities received community coaching from an Extension Professional or Educator in the use of the Voices for Food kit.

Behavioral: Coaching and Voices for Food Kit

Voices for Food Kit

SHAM COMPARATOR

The comparison community received the Voices for Food kit.

Behavioral: Voices for Food Kit

Interventions

Community Coaching and Voices for Food Kit

Coaching and Voices for Food Kit

Voices for Food Kit

Voices for Food Kit

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Food Pantry Clients must be current clientele by visiting the participating food pantry at least once in the last year, English-speaking.
  • Food Pantry Directors must be 18 years or older (19 if in Nebraska), English-speaking and a director of a participating food pantry.
  • Food Pantry Staff/Volunteers must be 18 years or older (19 if in Nebraska), English-speaking and a staff/volunteer of a participating food pantry.
  • Community Stakeholders must be 18 years or older (19 if in Nebraska), English-speaking and reside in the participating community.

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18 years old (19 if in Nebraska)
  • Non English- speaking

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • Wright BN, Vasquez-Mejia CM, Guenther PM, McCormack L, Stluka S, Franzen-Castle L, Henne B, Mehrle D, Remley D, Eicher-Miller HA. Fruit and Vegetable Healthy Eating Index Component Scores of Distributed Food Bags Were Positively Associated with Client Diet Scores in a Sample of Rural, Midwestern Food Pantries. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Jan;121(1):74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.09.033. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

  • Wright BN, Tooze JA, Bailey RL, Liu Y, Rivera RL, McCormack L, Stluka S, Franzen-Castle L, Henne B, Mehrle D, Remley D, Eicher-Miller HA. Dietary Quality and Usual Intake of Underconsumed Nutrients and Related Food Groups Differ by Food Security Status for Rural, Midwestern Food Pantry Clients. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Sep;120(9):1457-1468. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.04.011. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

  • Liu Y, Tooze JA, Zhang Y, Leidy HJ, Bailey RL, Wright B, Ma M, Stluka S, Remley DT, McCormack LA, Franzen-Castle L, Henne R, Mehrle D, Eicher-Miller HA. Breakfast Consumption Is Positively Associated with Usual Nutrient Intakes among Food Pantry Clients Living in Rural Communities. J Nutr. 2020 Mar 1;150(3):546-553. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz258.

  • Stluka S, Moore L, Eicher-Miller HA, Franzen-Castle L, Henne B, Mehrle D, Remley D, McCormack L. Voices for food: methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities. BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 23;18(1):1055. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5957-9.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Voice

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Physiological PhenomenaCirculatory and Respiratory Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Suzanne Stluka, PhD, RD, LN

    South Dakota State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Heather Eicher- Miller, PhD

    Purdue University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Rebecca Henne, MS

    Michigan State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Donna Mehrle, MPH, RD, LD

    University of Missouri-Columbia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Lisa Franzen-Castle, PhD

    University of Nebraska Lincoln

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dan Remley, PhD

    Ohio State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants were not aware of their status as a treatment or comparison community.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: All data were collected from both treatment an comparison communities at the same time points.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2018

First Posted

June 21, 2018

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion

March 15, 2018

Study Completion

March 15, 2018

Last Updated

June 21, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is not a plan to make IPD available.