NCT03564795

Brief Summary

A randomized, controlled, 30-subject, within-subject trial for examining the effectiveness of KeraStat Gel, as opposed to the institutional standard of care, silver sulfadiazine, in improving cosmesis of the healed wound.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 11, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 31, 2018

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

June 11, 2018

Results QC Date

May 12, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 31, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Wound DressingKeratinHydrogelBurn Dressing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Improved Cosmesis

    The degree of cosmetic improvement of the healed wound will be assessed by Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at one year. This scale consists of two parts: a Patient Scale and an Observer Scale. Both scales contain six items that are scored numerically on a 10-point range, where a '10' indicates the 'worst possible' \[e.g. itching or pigmentation\] and a '1' indicates normal skin. The Patient Scale is summed to make a 'Total Patient Score" ranging from 6 - 60. The Observer Scale is summed to make up a 'Total Observer Score' ranging from 6 - 60. The Total Patient Score and Total Observer Score can be summed into a Total POSAS Score ranging from 12 to 120.

    One year post burn

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain During Dressing Change

    Period during first month when dressing changes are required (Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28).

Study Arms (2)

KeraStat Gel

EXPERIMENTAL

Each enrolled subject will have at least one eligible burn randomized to the KeraStat Gel arm. This burn will be dressed with KeraStat Gel and covered by a secondary dressing. Subjects will be instructed to change the dressing and re-apply the KeraStat Gel per the instructions for use (at least every 3 days).

Device: KeraStat Gel

Silver Sulfadiazine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each enrolled subject will have at least one eligible burn randomized to the Silver Sulfadiazine arm. This burn will be dressed with the Silver Sulfadiazine and covered by a secondary dressing. Subjects will be instructed to change the dressing and re-apply the Silver Sulfadiazine per the institution's Standard of Care instructions.

Device: Silver Sulfadiazine

Interventions

Wound dressing for partial thickness burns

KeraStat Gel

Wound dressing for partial thickness burns

Also known as: SSD
Silver Sulfadiazine

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Presenting with at least two comparable, discrete, and separate partial thickness thermal burns, as determined by the Investigator, measuring 50 - 1,000 cm2 each
  • Study wounds identified are partial thickness depth
  • KeraStat Gel and SSD can be applied to randomized study burn wounds as definitive care treatment within 24 hours from time of injury\]
  • Overall total body surface area burned \< 20%

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Prisoner
  • Presence of inhalation injury, as determined by the Investigator
  • Injury requiring formal intravenous fluid resuscitation
  • Concomitant non-thermal traumatic injuries
  • Chronic medical conditions including, but not limited to, documented renal impairment (Cr \> 2.5 mg/dL), hepatic impairment (Total bilirubin \> 2.5 mg/dL), thromboembolic disorders, active infection in study wound areas, uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1C \> 7%), HIV infection, history of melanoma or systemic malignancy within the last 10 years
  • Receiving corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, radiation or chemotherapy, topical growth factors, or any other medication the Investigator feels will affect wound healing
  • Not expected to live at least 13 months post-burn
  • Received an investigational drug or biologic within 3 months prior to injury
  • Previously treated with a skin graft at either of the treatment sites
  • Chemical or electrical burn
  • Known or documented allergy to sulfonamides
  • Proposed study wounds are full thickness
  • Any condition the Investigator determines will compromise subject safety or prevent the subject from completing the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Wasiak J, Cleland H, Campbell F. Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD002106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002106.pub3.

    PMID: 18843629BACKGROUND
  • Tandara AA, Mustoe TA. The role of the epidermis in the control of scarring: evidence for mechanism of action for silicone gel. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Oct;61(10):1219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.03.022. Epub 2008 Jul 23.

    PMID: 18653391BACKGROUND
  • Mustoe TA, Gurjala A. The role of the epidermis and the mechanism of action of occlusive dressings in scarring. Wound Repair Regen. 2011 Sep;19 Suppl 1(0 1):s16-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00709.x.

    PMID: 21793961BACKGROUND
  • Steinstraesser L, Flak E, Witte B, Ring A, Tilkorn D, Hauser J, Langer S, Steinau HU, Al-Benna S. Pressure garment therapy alone and in combination with silicone for the prevention of hypertrophic scarring: randomized controlled trial with intraindividual comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Oct;128(4):306e-313e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268c69.

    PMID: 21921743BACKGROUND
  • Bloemen MC, van der Veer WM, Ulrich MM, van Zuijlen PP, Niessen FB, Middelkoop E. Prevention and curative management of hypertrophic scar formation. Burns. 2009 Jun;35(4):463-75. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.07.016. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

    PMID: 18951704BACKGROUND

Results Point of Contact

Title
Luke Burnett
Organization
KeraNetics

Study Officials

  • James H Holmes IV, MD

    Wake Forest Burn Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized, controlled within-subject trial of 30 patients, each of whom will have a minimum of one burn treated with the KeraStat Gel device and one burn treated with the standard of care dressing
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2018

First Posted

June 21, 2018

Study Start

August 31, 2018

Primary Completion

March 31, 2023

Study Completion

March 31, 2023

Last Updated

August 1, 2024

Results First Posted

August 1, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations