NCT03550001

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether injection of carbon nanoparticle as a lymph node tracer before neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer can increase lymph node yield after surgery compared which do not inject.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
252

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 25, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 8, 2018

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2019

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 8, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

May 25, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 25, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

locally advanced rectal cancerlymph node yeildlymph node tracerstage shiftprognosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • lymph node yield

    Amount of lymph node yield, dyeing lymph node, positive lymph node and the dyeing positive lymph node

    up to 30days after total mesorectal excision

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Impact on surgical operations

    Time of surgery

  • Quality of surgery

    Time of surgery

  • Surgery morbidity

    30 days and 12-months

  • Overall survival

    5-years

  • Disease free survival

    5-years

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Injection CNP before NAT

EXPERIMENTAL

Inject carbon nanoparticle as a lymph node tracer before the patient receive neoadjuvant therapy.

Procedure: Injection CNP before NAT

No injection

NO INTERVENTION

Do not inject carbon nanoparticle during the treatment.

Interventions

Injection carbon nanoparticle via rectal mucosa before neoadjuvant therapy

Injection CNP before NAT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age: 18-75 years old;
  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma;
  • The rectal adenocarcinoma 0-12cm from the anal margin;
  • Clinical TNM stage: T3+ or N+;
  • Untreated patients (who have not received treatment including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery);
  • Good liver and kidney function, without contraindications for radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery;
  • Able and willing to give informed consent to participate;

You may not qualify if:

  • Malignant tumor history or other malignant tumors;
  • Emergency operations such as intestinal obstruction, perforation and hemorrhage;
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • History of severe mental illness;
  • Contraindications for radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery;
  • Conditions that the researcher thinks it is not suitable for selection.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (17)

  • Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, Brown G, Rodel C, Cervantes A, Arnold D; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28881920BACKGROUND
  • Mechera R, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Speich B. Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Feb;72:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

    PMID: 28027520BACKGROUND
  • Gurawalia J, Dev K, Nayak SP, Kurpad V, Pandey A. Less than 12 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy: an indicator of tumor regression in locally advanced rectal cancer? J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Dec;7(6):946-957. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.09.03.

    PMID: 28078118BACKGROUND
  • Kim HJ, Jo JS, Lee SY, Kim CH, Kim YJ, Kim HR. Low Lymph Node Retrieval After Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer is Associated with Improved Prognosis in Patients with a Good Tumor Response. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):2075-81. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4235-z. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

    PMID: 25395150BACKGROUND
  • Xu Z, Berho ME, Becerra AZ, Aquina CT, Hensley BJ, Arsalanizadeh R, Noyes K, Monson JRT, Fleming FJ. Lymph node yield is an independent predictor of survival in rectal cancer regardless of receipt of neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Pathol. 2017 Jul;70(7):584-592. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203995. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

    PMID: 27932667BACKGROUND
  • Lykke J, Jess P, Roikjaer O; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. A minimum yield of twelve lymph nodes in rectal cancer remains valid in the era of neo-adjuvant treatment : results from a national cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Mar;30(3):347-51. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2145-6. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

    PMID: 25652878BACKGROUND
  • Lykke J, Jess P, Roikjaer O; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Increased Lymph Node Yield Is Associated With Improved Survival in Rectal Cancer Irrespective of Neoadjuvant Treatment: Results From a National Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Sep;58(9):823-30. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000429.

    PMID: 26252843BACKGROUND
  • Bhangu A, Kiran RP, Brown G, Goldin R, Tekkis P. Establishing the optimum lymph node yield for diagnosis of stage III rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Aug;18(8):709-17. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1114-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

    PMID: 24515286BACKGROUND
  • Carvalho C, Glynne-Jones R. Challenges behind proving efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):e354-e363. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30346-7.

    PMID: 28593861BACKGROUND
  • Horne J, Carr NJ, Bateman AC, Kandala N 2nd, Adams J, Silva S, Ryder I. A comparison of formalin and GEWF in fixation of colorectal carcinoma specimens: rates of lymph node retrieval and effect on TNM staging. J Clin Pathol. 2016 Jun;69(6):511-7. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203281. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

    PMID: 26621110BACKGROUND
  • Yegen G, Keskin M, Buyuk M, Kunduz E, Balik E, Saglam EK, Kapran Y, Asoglu O, Gulluoglu M. The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on the size, number, and distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2016 Feb;20:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

    PMID: 26706785BACKGROUND
  • Munster M, Hanisch U, Tuffaha M, Kube R, Ptok H. Ex Vivo Intra-arterial Methylene Blue Injection in Rectal Cancer Specimens Increases the Lymph-Node Harvest, Especially After Preoperative Radiation. World J Surg. 2016 Feb;40(2):463-70. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3230-2.

    PMID: 26310202BACKGROUND
  • Farinella E, Vigano L, Fava MC, Mineccia M, Bertolino F, Capussotti L. In vivo lymph node mapping and pattern of metastasis spread in locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;28(11):1523-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1727-4. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

    PMID: 23877264BACKGROUND
  • Zhang XM, Liang JW, Wang Z, Kou JT, Zhou ZX. Effect of preoperative injection of carbon nanoparticle suspension on the outcomes of selected patients with mid-low rectal cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2016 Apr 4;35:33. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0097-z.

    PMID: 27044280BACKGROUND
  • Wang Y, Deng H, Chen H, Liu H, Xue Q, Yan J, Li G. Preoperative Submucosal Injection of Carbon Nanoparticles Improves Lymph Node Staging Accuracy in Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Nov;221(5):923-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.455. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

    PMID: 26362137BACKGROUND
  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

    PMID: 19638912BACKGROUND
  • Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC, Marnay J, Henry-Amar M, Petiot JF, Roussel A, Jacob JH, Segol P, Samama G, et al. Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer. 1994 Jun 1;73(11):2680-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:113.0.co;2-c.

    PMID: 8194005BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Yingjiang Ye, MD,PhD

    Peking University People's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Open label
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Parallel
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Surgery, Director of Department of Gastroenterological Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2018

First Posted

June 8, 2018

Study Start

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion

June 1, 2019

Study Completion

October 1, 2023

Last Updated

June 8, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-05