Study Stopped
We were unable to enroll participants into the study.
Exercise for Adults Diagnosed With Rectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Currently, there is no clear indication if exercise is safe and if it confers health benefits for adults across the cancer trajectory (i.e., from diagnosis onward) for rectal cancer - a population who may have limited exercise tolerance and who may be at an increased risk for adverse events associated with exercise. In this prospective single-arm feasibility trial, we aim to examine the safety and feasibility of a 12-week exercise intervention for adults diagnosed with rectal cancer to inform the development of a large-scale randomized controlled trial that will assess the efficacy of exercise administered across the cancer trajectory for for rectal cancer. Adults who have been diagnosed with rectal cancer and are currently undergoing or have completed treatment (within the last five years) will be recruited over a 12-month period into a supervised exercise intervention consisting of aerobic and strength training to be done three times per week. Feasibility, safety, patient-reported outcomes, and physical tests will be performed pre-intervention and post-intervention. This study will provide data on the feasibility of an exercise intervention and will help determine if it is safe to progress with a large-scale randomized controlled trial to test the benefits of exercise for adults diagnosed with rectal cancer. It will also provide initial estimates of the parameters for patient-reported outcomes, which are required to calculate the sample size for the large-scale randomized controlled trial to ensure it is sufficiently powered. The purpose of this prospective single-arm feasibility trial is to determine if a 12-week exercise intervention offered to adults diagnosed with rectal cancer surviviors is safe and feasible. The specific objectives are to:
- 1.Test the feasibility and safety of a 12-week exercise intervention;
- 2.Obtain initial estimates of the parameters of the main outcomes to inform sample size calculations for the main study (i.e., means and standard deviations for patient-reported and physical outcomes);
- 3.Determine the opportune time in the cancer trajectory for rectal cancer to deliver a 12-week exercise intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Nov 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 4, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 4, 2019
CompletedMarch 10, 2020
March 1, 2020
2.1 years
February 7, 2017
March 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Recruitment Rates
The number of eligible participants who enrol in the study out of the number who are referred.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Retention Rates
The number of participants completing the intervention and all scheduled assessments.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Adherence Rates
The number of exercise sessions completed out of 36.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Number of Participants with Adverse Events
The number of participants reporting or presenting adverse events (e.g., injury) that occurs as a result of participating in the exercise sessions and/or its assessments.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Other Outcomes (11)
Quality of Life: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal (Ward et al., 1999; Yost et al., 2005)
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Cognitive Functioning: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Function (Wagner et al., 2004)
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Symptoms of Fatigue: the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (Yellen et al., 1997)
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
- +8 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Exercise
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be asked to complete a 12-week exercise intervention and all study assessments.
Interventions
Participants will engage in supervised exercise 3 times per week for 60-75 minutes/session for 12 weeks. Sessions will include a warm-up (aerobic activity less than \< 60% of heart rate reserve), aerobic training (30 minutes of exercise at 60-75% of heart rate reserve, using cycle ergometers/treadmills), strength training (8 exercises; upper body, lower body, and core), and a cool-down (aerobic activity less than \< 60% of heart rate reserve) component.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women 18 to 85 years of age;
- Diagnosed and/or completed treatment for stage I-III rectal cancer within the last 5 years;
- Able to read/understand English or French;
- Ambulatory;
- Live \<50km of the University of Ottawa;
- Approval of healthcare provider to participate in the intervention.
You may not qualify if:
- Congestive heart failure, clinically significant aortic stenosis, history of cardiac arrest, use of a cardiac defibrillator, uncontrolled angina, uncontrolled arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, major heart surgery, stroke, or pulmonary embolus;
- A diagnosis of hypertension or a resting blood pressure of 160/90 mmHg or higher (i.e., systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg);
- The use of supplemental oxygen;
- Severe arthritis (i.e., osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis);
- History of chest pain or severe shortness of breath either at rest or when engaging in physical activity;
- Hip fracture, hip or knee replacement in the past 6 months;
- Impairments requiring mobility aids;
- Stage V cancer;
- Prior cancer diagnosis, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer;
- Participating in another exercise trial;
- Unwilling/unable to give informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
Related Publications (9)
Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology - Physical activity training for health. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, 2013.
BACKGROUNDGodin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
PMID: 4053261BACKGROUNDIrwin ML. ACSM's guide to exercise and cancer survivorship. Champaign, IL: American College of Sports Medicine, 2012.
BACKGROUNDWagner LI, Cella D, Sweet J, Forrestal S. (2004). Chemotherapy-related cognitive deficits: development of the FACT-Cog instrument. Ann Behav Med, 27, S10.
BACKGROUNDWard WL, Hahn EA, Mo F, Hernandez L, Tulsky DS, Cella D. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 1999 May;8(3):181-95. doi: 10.1023/a:1008821826499.
PMID: 10472150BACKGROUNDWatson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
PMID: 3397865BACKGROUNDYellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00274-6.
PMID: 9095563BACKGROUNDYost KJ, Cella D, Chawla A, Holmgren E, Eton DT, Ayanian JZ, West DW. Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1241-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
PMID: 16291468BACKGROUNDBrunet J, Price J, Delluc C. An exercise trial for adults undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer proves not feasible: recommendations for future trials. Trials. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04958-z.
PMID: 33407782DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Brunet, PhD
University of Ottawa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2017
First Posted
February 9, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 4, 2019
Study Completion
December 4, 2019
Last Updated
March 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share