A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Safety and Efficacy Study of NA-831
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of NA-831 in Alzheimer Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NA-83 in subjects with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's Disease
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2019
CompletedJune 30, 2020
November 1, 2019
1 year
March 16, 2018
June 26, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale- Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score at Week 24
To study to the change from baseline in the Clinical Dementia Rating scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score at Week 2 and Week 24. The CDR-SB is obtained through interviews of patients and informants, and cognitive functioning is rated in 6 domains of functioning: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Each domain is rated on a 5-point scale of functioning as follows: 0, no impairment; 0.5, questionable impairment; 1, mild impairment; 2, moderate impairment; and 3, severe impairment (personal care is scored on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating available). The CDR-SOB score is obtained by summing each of the domain box scores, with scores ranging from 0 to 18 with the higher values represent worse outcome.
Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (2)
1. Mean difference between the last (Week 24) and first (Week 2) postdose using Clinical Dementia Rating Scale- Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) assessment
Week 24
Assess the change from baseline in ADCS-ADL MCI at Week 24
Week 24
Study Arms (4)
Low-dose N-831(Traneurocin)- 10 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALOral administration of 10 mg of NA-831 (Traneurocin) per day for 24 weeks
Medium-dose NA-831(Traneurocin)- 20 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALOral administration of 20 mg of NA-831(Traneurocin) per day for 24 weeks
High-dose NA-831(Traneurocin)- 40 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALOral administration of 40 mg of NA-831(Traneurocin) per day for 24 weeks
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOROral administration of placebo per day for 24 weeks
Interventions
Oral administration of 10 mg capsule of NA-831 QD for 24 weeks
Oral administration of 20 mg capsule of NA-831 QD for 24 weeks
Oral administration of 40 mg capsule of NA-831 QD or for 24 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is male or female, at 55-85 years of age (inclusive) at screening self-reported memory complaint, corroborated by spouse or companion as appropriate.
- Wechsler Memory Scale III (WMS-III) age-adjusted Logical Memory II score ≤ 5.
- Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) ≥23
- Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) score \<27.
- Normal thyroid function, defined as TSH, T3 and T4 within normal limits.
- Agree not to consume alcoholic beverages within 8 hours of each study visit.
- Willing and able to sign informed consent and complete the CTB and all other tests and procedures as listed in the protocol.
- Able to read at a 6th grade level or equivalent
- Female subjects must be surgically sterile or post-menopausal for at least 2 years. If \<2 years post-menopausal, then a follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) ≥40 mIU/mL must be obtained.
- If participant is receiving an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor or memantine, the dose must have been stable for at least three months before Screening
- Must have a reliable and competent trial partner/informant who has a close relationship with the participant and is willing to accompany the participant to all required trial visits, and to monitor compliance of the administration of the trial medication
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have any significant, untreated psychiatric illness or any CNS condition (such as schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, stroke, etc.) that could interfere with the study evaluations or procedures or which poses an additional risk.
- Evidence of a clinically relevant or unstable psychiatric disorder, excluding major depression in remission
- History of significant head trauma followed by persistent neurologic defaults or known structural brain abnormalities.
- Have had a stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) or unexplained loss of consciousness in the past 1 year
- History of seizures or epilepsy within the last 5 years
- History of hepatitis or liver disease that has been active within the 6 months prior toScreening
- History of malignancy occurring within the 5 years before Screening, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or localized prostate carcinoma
- Clinically significant vitamin B12 or folate deficiency in the 6 months before Screening
- History of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure or clinically significant conduction abnormalities within 1 year prior to Screening Visit
- History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence within the past year.
- Has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by medical history
- Acute infective sinusitis.
- History or presence of an abnormality of the external or internal structures of the nose or nasopharynx, except for surgical correction of the nasal septum or a "broken nose" at least 2 years previously, or surgical repair of cleft palate when \<30 years of age.
- Use of medications that are known to cause frank obtundation of cognition
- History of or current significant systemic disease judged to interfere with the study evaluations or likely to be a safety concern.
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
NeuroActiva-Clinical Research Unit
Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
NeuroActiva Testing Facility of NeuroActiva (New Zealand) Ltd
Auckland, New Zealand
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lloyd Tran, PhD
Biomed Industries, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2018
First Posted
May 29, 2018
Study Start
September 15, 2018
Primary Completion
September 30, 2019
Study Completion
October 30, 2019
Last Updated
June 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-11