Effectiveness of a Structured Intervention to Optimize the Use of Mirabegron
1 other identifier
interventional
1,932
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study was a multicentre, quasi-experimental design, controlled, before-and-after trial to estimate the effectiveness related to the review of mirabegron use and, if appropriate, its discontinuation. Intervention group: Patients with mirabegron prescription assigned to any of the 17 primary health care centers (PHC) located in the northern area of Barcelona. Control group: All the other patients assigned to any of the other 34 health care centers in Barcelona belonging to the Catalan Institut of Health (CIH). The structured intervention included initiatives with general practitioners and urologists/gynaecologists, management support from health care authorities, and monthly feed-back monitoring to general practitioners (GPs). The follow-up period was 12 months, from January 1st to December 31st, 2017.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2018
CompletedNovember 7, 2018
November 1, 2018
12 months
April 23, 2018
November 6, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline of the number of participants with treatment
The percentage of change from baseline of the number of participants with treatment at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months with respect to basal values (day 0)
Data will be collected prospectively at five points in time: Day 0; Month 3 after inclusion; Month 6 after inclusion; Month 9 after inclusion; Month 12 after inclusion
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change from baseline of the duration of treatment at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months with respect to basal values (day 0)
Data will be collected prospectively at five points in time: Day 0; Month 3 after inclusion; Month 6 after inclusion; Month 9 after inclusion; Month 12 after inclusion
Prevalence of patients with treatment
Data will be collected prospectively at two points in time: Day 0, Month 12 after inclusion
Study Arms (2)
Mirabegron intervention
EXPERIMENTALReview the use of mirabegron and its discontinuation
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONUsual care
Interventions
A structured intervention was designed consisting of four major sections: * General practitioners: information and training with written material and patient-centred prescribing. * Specialized hospital care: information regarding the intervention for urologists and gynaecologists. * Management support with the definition of a structured strategy. * Monthly monitoring of the intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients ≥ 18 years with mirabegron prescription. The prescription could be performed by a hospital or primary care doctor.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under 18 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, Reilly K, Kopp Z, Herschorn S, Coyne K, Kelleher C, Hampel C, Artibani W, Abrams P. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006 Dec;50(6):1306-14; discussion 1314-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.09.019. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
PMID: 17049716RESULTReeve E, Gnjidic D, Long J, Hilmer S. A systematic review of the emerging de fi nition of 'deprescribing' with network analysis: implications for future research and clinical practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Dec;80(6):1254-68. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12732.
PMID: 27006985RESULTScott IA, Hilmer SN, Reeve E, Potter K, Le Couteur D, Rigby D, Gnjidic D, Del Mar CB, Roughead EE, Page A, Jansen J, Martin JH. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):827-34. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0324.
PMID: 25798731RESULTWagg A, Franks B, Ramos B, Berner T. Persistence and adherence with the new beta-3 receptor agonist, mirabegron, versus antimuscarinics in overactive bladder: Early experience in Canada. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(9-10):343-50. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3098.
PMID: 26644809RESULTChapple CR, Cruz F, Deffieux X, Milani AL, Arlandis S, Artibani W, Bauer RM, Burkhard F, Cardozo L, Castro-Diaz D, Cornu JN, Deprest J, Gunnemann A, Gyhagen M, Heesakkers J, Koelbl H, MacNeil S, Naumann G, Roovers JWR, Salvatore S, Sievert KD, Tarcan T, Van der Aa F, Montorsi F, Wirth M, Abdel-Fattah M. Consensus Statement of the European Urology Association and the European Urogynaecological Association on the Use of Implanted Materials for Treating Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):424-431. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.048. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
PMID: 28413126RESULTWagg AS, Foley S, Peters J, Nazir J, Kool-Houweling L, Scrine L. Persistence and adherence with mirabegron vs antimuscarinics in overactive bladder: Retrospective analysis of a UK General Practice prescription database. Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;71(10). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12996. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
PMID: 28906080RESULTDuckett J, Balachandran A. Tolerability and persistence in a large, prospective case series of women prescribed mirabegron. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Aug;27(8):1163-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2945-4. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
PMID: 26803838RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eladio Fernández-Liz, PhD
Pharmacist
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pedro Vivó Tristante, Physician
Director. Primary Health Care Center Montcada i Reixac
- STUDY CHAIR
Antonio Aranzana Martínez, Physician
Director. Primary Health Care Center Rio de Janeiro
- STUDY CHAIR
Mª Estrella Barceló Colomer, Physician
Clinical Pharmacologist
- STUDY CHAIR
José Ossó Rebull, Physician
Director. Primary Health Care Center Sant Andreu
- STUDY CHAIR
María José López-Dolcet, Physician
Director. Primary Health Care Center Service Muntanya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2018
First Posted
May 24, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
November 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11