NCT06438861

Brief Summary

Defined by the International Continence Society (ICS) as urinary "urgency, with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia", overactive bladder (OAB) presents as challenging syndrome to treat. OAB is a very prevalent condition, affecting between 11.8% to 16% of the population with equal impact on women and men and growing prevalence with age. OAB is associated with a significant financial burden to both patients and the health care system with a estimated cost of US $82.6 billion in 2020. Traditionally, a stepwise approach has been taken in managing OAB; starting first with lifestyle modifications, followed by anticholinergic or beta-3-agonist medications as the second line, and lastly, intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), and sacral neuromodulation (SNM) as third line options. Given the limitations of this stepwise approach in patients with refractory OAB, combination therapy offers patients an increasing number of treatment options but the literature surrounding the efficacy of combination therapy is somewhat limited. A 2019 systematic review revealed there were only 32 studies in the current OAB literature that explored the role of combination therapy, and the majority of these studies examined the effect of lifestyle modifications with another intervention strategy, highlighting an untapped area of research5. To date, there has only been a single pilot study conducted in Taiwan examining the effect of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections with the addition of mirabegron for patients with refractory OAB. This study by Wang et al. explored the therapeutic impact of adding either an anticholinergic, solifenacin, or a beta-3 agonist, mirabegron, to intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections as compared to each other as well as patients receiving onabotulinumtoxinA alone. Ninety patients were enrolled with 30 patients allocated to the solifenacin arm, 31 to the mirabegron arm, and 29 to the control group. While the baseline data among the three arms was comparable, the percentage of OAB wet in the mirabegron plus onabotulinumtoxinA group was significantly less at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month intervals than the solifenacin plus onabotulinumtoxinA and the onabotulinumtoxinA alone groups. While this pilot study reveals the potential additive benefit of a beta-3 agonist to intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA, no further studies have been performed to date and there are no studies regarding the additive benefit of vibegron, which has a more tolerable side effect profile and is not as limited by as many contraindications as mirabegron. If vibegron can potentiate the effect of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA, this presents a new treatment strategy for OAB and could offer patients an additional line of therapy before having to pursue more invasive and costly management option of sacral neuro modulation.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2024

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 3, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

May 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Refractory Overactive Bladder Syndrome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in urinary urgency incontinence (UUI) episodes on 3 day voiding diary at 12 weeks after starting treatment as compared to baseline

    Patients will be asked to complete a 3 day voiding diary at baseline and at 12 weeks following intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections and oral medication. The mean change in UUI episodes will be compared between the onabotulinumtoxinA injection plus vibegron verus onabotulinumtoxinA injection plus placebo groups.

    Pre-intervention baseline to 12 weeks following initiation of intervention

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in Symptom Distress as Measured by the Urogenital Distress Index (UDI-6) Questionnaire Pre-Intervention versus 12 weeks Post-Intervention

    Pre-intervention baseline to 12 weeks following initiation of intervention

  • Change in UUI (Urge Urinary Incontinence)/OAB (Overactive Bladder) Quality of Life as Measured by the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7) Questionnaire Pre-Intervention versus 12 weeks Post-Intervention

    Pre-intervention baseline to 12 weeks following initiation of intervention

  • hange in UUI (Urge Urinary Incontinence)/OAB (Overactive Bladder) Quality of Life as Measured by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OAB-q SF) Questionnaire Pre-Intervention versus 12 weeks Post-Intervention

    Pre-intervention baseline to 12 weeks following initiation of intervention

  • Duration to repeat onabotulinumtoxinA injection

    Initiation of intervention until repeat injection, anticipate average of 1 year

Study Arms (2)

100U intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA plus vibegron

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each patient will undergo intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections of 100U either in the office or in the operating room depending on patient and provider preference. Patients randomized to this arm will begin taking vibegron 75mg daily, which is the standard dose, starting the day of their procedure and continue for 3 months.

Drug: Vibegron 75mg

100U intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA plus placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Each patient will undergo intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections of 100U either in the office or in the operating room depending on patient and provider preference. Patients randomized to this arm will begin taking a placebo pill daily starting the day of their procedure and continue for 3 months.

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Each patient will undergo intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections of 100U either in the office or in the operating room depending on patient and provider preference. Patients will begin taking vibegron 75mg daily or a placebo pill daily starting the day of their procedure and continue for 3 months.

100U intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA plus vibegron

Each patient will undergo intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections of 100U either in the office or in the operating room depending on patient and provider preference. Patients will begin taking vibegron 75mg daily or a placebo pill daily starting the day of their procedure and continue for 3 months.

100U intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA plus placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women undergoing intradetrusor botulinum injections for refractory OAB
  • Age 18 years old or greater
  • Fluency and literacy in English
  • Capacity to provide consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to Vibegron
  • Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant
  • Breastfeeding
  • Current digoxin use

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (8)

  • Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12559262BACKGROUND
  • Coyne KS, Wein A, Nicholson S, Kvasz M, Chen CI, Milsom I. Economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence in the United States: a systematic review. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Feb;20(2):130-40. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.2.130.

    PMID: 24456314BACKGROUND
  • Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, Reilly K, Kopp Z, Herschorn S, Coyne K, Kelleher C, Hampel C, Artibani W, Abrams P. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006 Dec;50(6):1306-14; discussion 1314-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.09.019. Epub 2006 Oct 2.

    PMID: 17049716BACKGROUND
  • Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW, Abrams P, Herzog AR, Corey R, Hunt TL, Wein AJ. Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol. 2003 May;20(6):327-36. doi: 10.1007/s00345-002-0301-4. Epub 2002 Nov 15.

    PMID: 12811491BACKGROUND
  • Kasman A, Stave C, Elliott CS. Combination therapy in overactive bladder-untapped research opportunities: A systematic review of the literature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Nov;38(8):2083-2092. doi: 10.1002/nau.24158. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

    PMID: 31483070BACKGROUND
  • Wang CC, Lee CL, Hwang YT, Kuo HC. Adding mirabegron after intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection improves therapeutic effects in patients with refractory overactive bladder. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021 Oct;13(4):440-447. doi: 10.1111/luts.12384. Epub 2021 May 6.

    PMID: 33960119BACKGROUND
  • Sancaktar M, Ceyhan ST, Akyol I, Muhcu M, Alanbay I, Mutlu Ercan C, Atay V. The outcome of adding peripheral neuromodulation (Stoller afferent neuro-stimulation) to anti-muscarinic therapy in women with severe overactive bladder. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010 Oct;26(10):729-32. doi: 10.3109/09513591003649815.

    PMID: 20210697BACKGROUND
  • Stanley RF, Meyer I, Blanchard CT, Richter HE. Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation With versus Without Mirabegron: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Aug;35(8):1709-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05835-y. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

    PMID: 39101958BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

N-(4-((5-(hydroxy(phenyl)methyl)pyrrolidin-2-yl)methyl)phenyl)-4-oxo-4,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrrolo(1,2-a)pyrimidine-6-carboxamide
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Urogynecology Fellow

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2024

First Posted

June 3, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share