Study Stopped
due to the corona pandemic, live patient contact was no longer possible. As a result, the study had to be stopped early.
TTNS Versus Sham Therapy for Children With iOAB (TaPaS Part I)
TaPaS
A Randomized-controlled Trial Comparing Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS) Versus Sham Therapy on Short Term Continence Outcomes in Children With the Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Syndrome: the TaPaS Trial Part I
1 other identifier
interventional
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Part I of the TaPaS trial forms part of a twofold clinical RCT: Part 1) A prospective RCT comparing the efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) with TTNS sham therapy for children with idiopathic overactive bladder on clinical and patient reported outcomes (PROMS). Part 2) A prospective RCT comparing TTNS versus Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) on clinical outcomes and PROMS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedJanuary 4, 2023
January 1, 2023
1.6 years
January 15, 2020
January 2, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean voided volume per void
Difference in mean voided volume per void in percentage
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Maximum voided volume (ml)
12 weeks
Number of urgency incontinence episodes / 24 h.
12 weeks
Daytime voiding frequency
12 weeks
Satisfaction on urinary symptoms reported by parents
12 weeks
Time to recurrence
At 12 weeks of treatment + at 6 weeks of observational period without treatment.
Study Arms (2)
Active TTNS
ACTIVE COMPARATORChildren treated by transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. TENS device connected to adhesive electrodes. Stimulation settings: 200 µS, 20 Hz, 1-20 V ( depending of sensory response) Home-therapy: Daily stimulation during 60 minutes.
TTNS sham intervention
SHAM COMPARATORChildren treated by TTNS with same positioning as the active TTNS treatment. Stimulation settings: 200 µS, 20 Hz, 0-1 V. Patients and parents will be told that electric currence is given, but that no sensation will be feld. Home therapy: Daily stimulation during 60 minutes.
Interventions
See section 'arms' Stimulation settings: 200 µS, 20 Hz, 1-20 V ( depending of sensory response) Home-therapy: Daily stimulation during 60 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children between 5 and 12 years old, clinically diagnosed with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome with urinary incontinence (daytime and/or nighttime)
- Untreated, except from urotherapy.
You may not qualify if:
- Enuresis nocturna due to nocturnal polyuria
- Dysfunctional voiding
- Neurogenic bladder
- Psychiatric disorders, behavioural disturbances or mental disabilities
- Treated before with pharmacotherapy or invasive therapies for OAB
- Children with parents unable to record reliably micturition diaries.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, East-Flanders, 9000, Belgium
Related Publications (3)
Boudaoud N, Binet A, Line A, Chaouadi D, Jolly C, Fiquet CF, Ripert T, Merol ML. Management of refractory overactive bladder in children by transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation: A controlled study. J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Jun;11(3):138.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.09.013. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
PMID: 25979217BACKGROUNDPatidar N, Mittal V, Kumar M, Sureka SK, Arora S, Ansari MS. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in pediatric overactive bladder: A preliminary report. J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Dec;11(6):351.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.04.040. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
PMID: 26279104RESULTGhijselings L, Renson C, Van de Walle J, Everaert K, Spinoit AF. Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial. Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8.
PMID: 33810804DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne-Françoise Spinoit, Professor
University Hospital, Ghent
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants are blinded for the given treatment ( Active TTNS vs. Sham TTNS) by the care provider ( Physiotherapist). The outcomes assessor (the pediatric urologist) isn't aware of the treatment neither.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2020
First Posted
February 5, 2020
Study Start
November 7, 2018
Primary Completion
July 1, 2020
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 4, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share