Comparison of 2 Application Techniques for LET Gel Used Prior to Simple Laceration Repair
LET
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare pain scores during laceration repair with first suture placement using standardized visual analog scale (VAS) between 2 different topical local anesthetic application techniques for using LET gel. Specifically, the investigators are studying if applying LET gel 3 times, spaced 10 minutes apart (triple LET) provides superior anesthesia to one 30 minute application (single LET). Single LET is the current standard method of application.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2020
CompletedSeptember 2, 2020
September 1, 2020
5 months
June 20, 2019
September 1, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare pain scores
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) asks subjects to rate pain marking an X on a line between two ends: "No pain" (on the left) and "Pain as bad as it could possibly be" (on the right). The distance will be measured from "No pain" to the X placed by the subject. A higher measurement indicates more pain.
The VAS to rate pain will be collected during laceration repair, immediately after the first suture placement or attempt. The VAS score is estimated to take up to 1 minute to collect. The VAS scale will be collected for each enrolled subject.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
To compare provider satisfaction scores
The provider satisfaction Likert scale will be collected immediately after the procedure.
To compare parental satisfaction scores
The parental satisfaction Likert scale will be collected immediately after the procedure.
Study Arms (2)
1 application
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive single dose LET
3 applications
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive 3 doses of LET
Interventions
1 application of LET topical anesthetic gel
3 applications of LET topical anesthetic gel
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with simple (\< 3 cm) lacerations who are \> 7 years old and \< 18 years old, for whom the physician plans to close the laceration using simple superficial interrupted sutures.
You may not qualify if:
- Lacerations involving the hands, feet, genitals, tongue, mucus membranes, nose, ears, or occurring over joints.
- Patients who are developmentally delayed or have a disability preventing them from giving a reliable pain score.
- Patients whose primary language is other than English or Spanish.
- Patients for whom procedural sedation is required.
- Patients receiving intranasal or oral midazolam or inhaled nitrous oxide.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHOC Children's
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Related Publications (2)
Harman S, Zemek R, Duncan MJ, Ying Y, Petrcich W. Efficacy of pain control with topical lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine during laceration repair with tissue adhesive in children: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2013 Sep 17;185(13):E629-34. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130269. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
PMID: 23897942BACKGROUNDPriestley S, Kelly AM, Chow L, Powell C, Williams A. Application of topical local anesthetic at triage reduces treatment time for children with lacerations: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jul;42(1):34-40. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.207.
PMID: 12827121BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joshua Siembieda
CHOC Childrens
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Topical anesthetic applied by RN not involved in procedure.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician; Emergency Department Medical Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2019
First Posted
September 2, 2020
Study Start
June 19, 2019
Primary Completion
November 6, 2019
Study Completion
June 25, 2020
Last Updated
September 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share