MGB/OAGB Versus RYGB After Failed Sleeve
A Comparison of the Mini/One Anastomosis-Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Conversion of Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sleeve Gastrectomy is the most performed bariatric procedure worldwide. But a growing number of data documents that some patients have to be surgical revised due to weight regain or gastro-esophageal reflux disease. This study elaborates weather Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or Mini/One anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB) is a better second step procedure after failed sleeve gastrectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable obesity
Started Oct 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 2, 2018
September 1, 2018
3.2 years
April 23, 2018
September 29, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Weight Loss
Total Body Weight Loss in %
1 year follow-up
Weight Loss
Excess Weight Loss in %
1 year follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Perioperative Complications
up to 30 days postsurgery
Postoperative Morbidity
1 year follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Failed sleeve gastrectomy - RNYGB
OTHERIntervention: Roux en Y gasric bypass (RNYGB)
Failed sleeve gastrectomy - MGB/OAGB
OTHERInervention: Mini/One anastomosis gasic bypass (MGB/OAGB)
Interventions
Laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass (150 cm alimentary limb, 50 cm biliopancreaty limb)
Laparoscopic Mini/One anastomosis gastric bypass (200 cm biliopancreatic limb)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with failed sleeve due to
- weight regain
- weight loss failure
- gastro-esophageal reflux disease Grade B
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sana Klinikum Offenbach
Offenbach, Offenbach Am Main, 63069, Germany
Related Publications (6)
Almalki OM, Lee WJ, Chen JC, Ser KH, Lee YC, Chen SC. Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures: Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):970-975. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2991-0.
PMID: 29101719RESULTSarela AI, Dexter SP, O'Kane M, Menon A, McMahon MJ. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 8-9-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Nov-Dec;8(6):679-84. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.020. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
PMID: 21890430RESULTFelsenreich DM, Kefurt R, Schermann M, Beckerhinn P, Kristo I, Krebs M, Prager G, Langer FB. Reflux, Sleeve Dilation, and Barrett's Esophagus after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Long-Term Follow-Up. Obes Surg. 2017 Dec;27(12):3092-3101. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2748-9.
PMID: 28593484RESULTWeiner RA, Theodoridou S, Weiner S. Failure of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--further procedure? Obes Facts. 2011;4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):42-6. doi: 10.1159/000327343. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
PMID: 22027290RESULTCasillas RA, Um SS, Zelada Getty JL, Sachs S, Kim BB. Revision of primary sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: indications and outcomes from a high-volume center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Dec;12(10):1817-1825. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.09.038. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
PMID: 27887931RESULTDisse E, Pasquer A, Espalieu P, Poncet G, Gouillat C, Robert M. Greater weight loss with the omega loop bypass compared to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study. Obes Surg. 2014 Jun;24(6):841-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1180-7.
PMID: 24442421RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sonja Chiappetta, MD
Sana Klinikum Offenbach
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Senior Consultant, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2018
First Posted
May 16, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
September 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Anonymous data will be published.