NCT02139813

Brief Summary

Several prospective trials and metaanalysis have demonstrated the superiority of bariatric surgery on the medical treatment of obesity. The Roux-en-Y Gastric ByPass (RYGBP) procedure has been practiced for more than 30 years, and is the procedure of choice for morbidly obese with metabolic disorders in most of the reference centers. Nevertheless, the RYGBP is a technically demanding procedure with a learning curve of more than 75 cases. The complication rate is around 10% in expert centers. More recently another procedure has been described which seems as efficient on weight loss and co-morbidities as the RYGBP, with the advantage of being less technically difficult and less morbid, especially for multi-complicated obese and/or the super obese. It consists of a unique gastro-jejunal anastomosis between a long gastric pouch and a jejunal Omega loop. However, this procedure could be at risk of biliary reflux and anastomotic ulcers with dysplastic changes of the gastric and esophageal mucosa. As a result, the Omega loop bypass (OLB) has only been developed by a few teams and remains a controversial subject, particularly as only one monocentric randomized trial has compared it to the RYGBP, which is remains the gold standard. The first litterature results show similar or even better weight loss efficiency than RYGBP with a better feasibility. The early complication rate seems lower, but there are still insufficient data on long term morbidity and biliary reflux consequences. By performing a randomized and prospective comparison of OLB to RYGBP, the aim of the investigators study is to analyze the weight loss efficiency, the morbidity and mortality, the feasibility, and the quality of life of both techniques, in order to validate the Omega loop bypass as a procedure of choice in bariatric surgery Hypothesis : The OLB, while being as efficient as RYGBP on weight loss and metabolic complications, could be less morbid.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
256

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity

Geographic Reach
1 country

9 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2014

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2014

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

May 12, 2014

Last Update Submit

December 13, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Obesity -Bariatric surgeryGastric bypass

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Weight loss assessment according to Excess BMI Loss percentage (EBL%)

    Weight loss assessment according to Excess BMI Loss percentage (EBL%), calculated using the following formula: ((BMI 2 years after surgery - initial BMI) / (initial BMI - 22.5)) X 100

    2 years after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Weight loss according to absolute weight loss (aWL in kg), Excess Weight Loss percentage (EWL%), EBL%

    1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery

  • Waist size reduction according to absolute waist size (in cm)

    1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery

  • Medical and surgical complication rates

    1, 12 and 24 months after surgery

  • Type and severity of complications

    During the month following surgery (for early complications) and from one month to 24 months postoperatively (for late complications)

  • Operative time

    Recorded on the day of surgery (Day 0)

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Laparoscopic Omega Loop Bypass

EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic Mini-gastric bypass

Procedure: Laparoscopic Mini-gastric bypass

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric ByPass

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure of reference in bariatric surgery

Procedure: Procedure of reference in bariatric surgery

Interventions

The laparoscopic Omega Loop Bypass will consist of: * a long gastric tube, stapled approximately 1.5 cm from the left of the lesser curvature of the antrum to the angle of His * a narrow gastric tube will be calibrated to be approximately 1.5 cm wide * an Omega loop of 200 cm * a unique gastro-jejunal anatomosis of 200cm from the ligament of Treitz, using a linear stapler

Laparoscopic Omega Loop Bypass

The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass will consist of: * a small gastric pouch (about 30cc) * an antecolic alimentary limb * a gastro-jejunal anastomosis using a linear stapler * a 150cm long alimentary limb * a 50cm biliary limb * a latero-lateral jejuno-jejunal anastomosis * closure of the mesenteric defects

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric ByPass

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged between 18 and 65 years old
  • Morbid obesity with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 associated with one or more co-morbidities (type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, sleep apnea, dyslipidemia, arthritis)
  • Patient who has benefited from an upper GI endoscopy with biopsies
  • Patient who has benefited from a pluridisciplinary evaluation, with a favorable opinion for a gastric bypass
  • Patient who understands and accepts the need for a long term follow-up
  • Patient who agrees to be included in the study and who signs the informed consent form
  • Patient affiliated to a healthcare insurance plan

You may not qualify if:

  • History of esophagitis on upper GI endoscopy (Los Angeles classification)
  • Severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), resistant to medical treatment
  • Presence of dysplastic modifications of the gastric mucosa or a history of gastric cancer, on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
  • Presence of Helicobacter Pylori resistant to medical treatment
  • Presence of an unhealed gastro-duodenal ulcer or an ulcer diagnosed less than 2 months previously
  • History of previous bariatric surgery (gastric band, sleeve gastrectomy, vertical banded gastroplasty)
  • Presence of a severe and evolutive life threatening pathology, unrelated to obesity
  • Presence of chronic diarrhea (≥ 3 loose or liquid stools per day, over a period of more than 4 weeks)
  • Pregnancy or desire to be pregnant during the study
  • Binge eating disorders or other eating disorders according to DSM V criteria
  • Mentally unbalanced patients, under supervision or guardianship
  • Patient who does not understand French/is unable to give consent
  • Patient not affiliated to a French or European healthcare insurance
  • Patient who has already been included in a trial which has a conflict of interests with the present study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

Clinique Universitaire de Chirurgie Digestive et de l'Urgence - CHU de Grenoble

Grenoble, 38043, France

Location

Cabinet de chirurgie générale, digestive et de l'obésité - Hôpital Privé Drôme et Ardèche

Guilherand-Granges, 07500, France

Location

Service de Chirurgie Générale et Endocrinienne - Hôpital Claude Huriez - CHU de Lille

Lille, 59037, France

Location

Service de Chirurgie Digestive - Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices Civils de Lyon

Lyon, 69437, France

Location

Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-Bilio-Pancréatique et Transplantation Hépatique - Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière

Paris, 75013, France

Location

Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Générale et Cancérologique - Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou - APHP

Paris, 75908, France

Location

Service de Chirurgie Générale - Hôpital Privé de la Loire

Saint-Etienne, 42100, France

Location

Service de Chirurgie Générale, Digestive et Viscérale - Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy / Saint Gerrmain en Laye

Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78100, France

Location

Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-Biliaire-Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint Grégoire

Saint-Grégoire, 35768, France

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, Caiazzo R, Sterkers A, Khamphommala L, Poghosyan T, Chevallier JM, Malherbe V, Chouillard E, Reche F, Torcivia A, Maucort-Boulch D, Bin-Dorel S, Langlois-Jacques C, Delaunay D, Pattou F, Disse E. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1299-1309. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

  • Robert M, Poghosyan T, Maucort-Boulch D, Filippello A, Caiazzo R, Sterkers A, Khamphommala L, Reche F, Malherbe V, Torcivia A, Saber T, Delaunay D, Langlois-Jacques C, Suffisseau A, Bin S, Disse E, Pattou F. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at 5 years (YOMEGA): a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised extension study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Apr;12(4):267-276. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00035-4. Epub 2024 Mar 4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Interventions

Bariatric Surgery

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BariatricsObesity ManagementTherapeuticsSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Maud ROBERT, MD

    Service de Chirurgie Digestive - Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices Civils de Lyon - France

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2014

First Posted

May 15, 2014

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

March 1, 2018

Study Completion

March 1, 2018

Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations