Repeatability and Reproducibility of the IOLMaster 700 Vers 1.70 and Agreement With IOLMaster 700 Vers. 1.50 and Pentacam
1 other identifier
observational
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objectives of this study are to determine the agreement of measurements between the IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.70 and IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.50 and Pentacam, as well as to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the IOLMaster 700 SW Vers 1.70. The following parameters will be evaluated for Total Keratometry, (TK) and Posterior Corneal Surface (PCS):
- cylinder (CYL), Axis (A)
- spherical equivalent (SE) Specific Objectives:
- To compare the agreement of SE between IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.70 and IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.50 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)
- To compare the agreement of Cylinder magnitude and axis between IOLMaster 700 SW Version 1.70 and Pentacam
- To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.70 for all measurement parameters listed above
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2018
CompletedMay 31, 2018
May 1, 2018
1 month
April 6, 2018
May 30, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Measurement Agreement between IOL Master Software Versions 1.70 and 1.50.
IOLMaster 700 Vers. 1.70 SE\_TK (Spherical Equivalent\_Total Keratometry) Measurements will be compared to IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.50 SE\_K (Spherical Equivalent\_Keratometry) Measurements for Agreement.
1 hour
Measurement Agreement between IOLMaster Software Version 1.70 and Pentacam.
IOLMaster 700 Vers. 1.70 A\_TK (Axis\_Total Keratometry), Cyl\_TK (Cylinder\_Total Keratometry), A\_PCS (Axis\_Posterior Corneal Surface), SE\_PCS (Spherical Equivalent\_Posterior Corneal Surface), and Cyl\_PCS (Cylinder\_Posterior Corneal Surface) Measurements will be compared to Pentacam Measurements for Agreement.
1 hour
Repeatability and Reproducibility of IOLMaster 700 Software Version 700 Measurements.
3\. Evaluate the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the IOLMaster 700 SW Version 1.70 for A\_TK, A\_PCS, Cyl\_TK, Cyl\_PCS, SE\_TK and SE\_PCS.
1 hour
Study Arms (3)
Normal Eyes
Eyes with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better, and lens opacities of 1.0 or less in the study eye using the LOCS III system, and no prior Laser Vision Correction.
Cataract Eyes
Cataract in the study eye greater than Grade 1 using the LOCS III system for one or more: nuclear opacity, nuclear color, cortical opacity, or PSC.
Post LVC Eyes
History of Laser Vision Correction (LVC)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
There will be three cohorts: normal eyes (Group 1), cataract eyes (Group 2), and post Laser Vision Correction (LVC) eyes (Group 3), with no cross-over between the study groups.
You may qualify if:
- Male or Female 22 years of age and older.
- No history of rigid contact lens wear for at least 2 weeks. Soft lenses, if worn, should be removed at least one hour prior to the measurement.
- Able and willing to make the required study visits.
- Able and willing to give consent and follow study instructions.
- Group 1: normal eyes with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better, and lens opacities of 1.0 or less in the study eye using the LOCS III system, and no prior Laser Vision Correction.
- Group 2: cataract in the study eye greater than Grade 1 using the LOCS III system for one or more: nuclear opacity, nuclear color, cortical opacity, or PSC.
- Group 3: history of Laser Vision Correction (LVC).
You may not qualify if:
- Previous intraocular surgery other than Laser Vision Correction in the study eye.
- Previous corneal surgery other than Laser Vision Correction in the study eye.
- Presence of any corneal or retinal abnormality on slit lamp examination in the study eye.
- Corneal Cylinder \< 0.75D measured with a IOLMaster.
- Active ocular infection or inflammation.
- Poor tear film/insufficient corneal reflex.
- Best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/200 in the study eye.
- Physical inability to be positioned at the slit-lamp biomicroscope or study devices (e.g. torticollis, head tremor, etc.).
- Insufficient eyelid opening or eyelashes which partially conceal alignment or keratometry reflections and prevent capture of all measurements.
- Inability to fixate (e.g. due to nystagmus, amblyopia or ocular disease, such as macular degeneration).
- Rigid contact lens wear during past two weeks.
- Principal Investigator's determination that the subject is not suitable due to other medical condition (reasons to be listed on eCRFs).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.lead
- ClinReg Consulting Services, Inc.collaborator
- Sierra Clinical Services, LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Slade & Baker Vision
Houston, Texas, 77027, United States
Related Publications (3)
Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry : intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Dec;27(12):1961-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01214-7.
PMID: 11738911BACKGROUNDLu MJ, Zhong WH, Liu YX, Miao HZ, Li YC, Ji MH. Sample Size for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Measurement by Bland-Altman Method. Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2):/j/ijb.2016.12.issue-2/ijb-2015-0039/ijb-2015-0039.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0039.
PMID: 27838682BACKGROUNDBaumeister M, Terzi E, Ekici Y, Kohnen T. Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Feb;30(2):374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.06.004.
PMID: 15030827BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen Slade, MD
Slade & Baker Vision
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2018
First Posted
May 8, 2018
Study Start
March 16, 2018
Primary Completion
April 20, 2018
Study Completion
April 20, 2018
Last Updated
May 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share