Study Stopped
Original device is now discontinued; we are changing the study device shortly
Intranasal Neurostimulation in Ameliorating Symptoms of Neuropathic Corneal Pain
INSTANT
Assessing the Efficacy of Intranasal Neurostimulation in Ameliorating Symptoms of Neuropathic Corneal Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, interventional, open-label, single arm, non-randomized trial treating 30 patients with peripheral or mixed neuropathic corneal pain at their baseline exam and following 45 days and 90 days of daily use with the TrueTear™ ITN device.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 9, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 9, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 24, 2025
CompletedAugust 24, 2025
August 1, 2025
4 years
September 12, 2018
February 24, 2025
August 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change to Overall Pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) Stimulation at Baseline
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line, with one end labeled 'no pain' (which is equivalent to a score of 0 on the numerical scale) and the other end labeled 'worst pain imaginable' (which is equivalent to a score of 10 on the numerical scale). The patient is asked to mark the scale according to the intensity of their eye pain, and the examiner measures the distance in centimeters from the 'no pain' end of the line to score the VAS. The level of discomfort/pain before and after ITN was assessed using the VAS questionnaire (0-10). The changes in overall eye pain after ITN were recorded. Higher scores on the VAS indicate more intense pain and a worse outcome.
immediately before and after ITN on Day 1 (baseline)
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change to Overall Pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After Daily Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) Stimulation Over 45-day Period
immediately before and after ITN on Day 45
Change to Overall Pain by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After Daily Intranasal Neurostimulator (ITN) Stimulation Over 90-day Period
immediately before and after ITN on Day 90
Quality of Life as Measured With OPAS at Baseline
Day 1 (Baseline)
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 45 Days
45 days
Quality of Life as Measured Daily With OPAS at 90 Days
90 days
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
EXPERIMENTALTrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Interventions
TrueTear™ intranasal neurostimulator (ITN)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>22
- Ability to consent to study.
- Symptoms of neuropathic corneal pain for at least 3 months, such as burning, stinging, light sensitivity, discomfort or pain.
- Positive in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) findings for NCP such as presence of microneuromas and decreased nerve density.
- Fifty percent or more relief of pain or discomfort after instillation of Proparacaine eye drops as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant acute ocular surface diseases, such as active infectious keratitis or recent ocular surgery in the past 3 months.
- Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders.
- Nasal or sinus surgery or significant trauma to the nose.
- Severe nasal airway obstruction or vascularized nasal polyps.
- Cardiac demand pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, or other implanted electronic device in the head or neck.
- Chronic or recurrent nosebleeds
- Bleeding disorder
- Known hypersensitivity (allergy) to the hydrogel material
- Disabling arthritis, neuropathy, or limited motor coordination affecting self-handling of the device.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Patients were not compliant in returning to clinic for follow-up visits. This may be because these visits were to occur on the same day as their routine clinical follow-up visits and the patients repeatedly skipped or cancelled their visits.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pedram Hamrah, MD
- Organization
- Tufts Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pedram Hamrah, MD
Tufts Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2018
First Posted
September 18, 2018
Study Start
September 28, 2018
Primary Completion
September 9, 2022
Study Completion
September 9, 2023
Last Updated
August 24, 2025
Results First Posted
August 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share