NCT02293122

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the precision and agreement of the study device, a specular microscope, in comparison to a currently commercially available specular microscope in establishing substantial equivalence of the two devices in clinical use for diagnostic purposes of the human cornea.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2014

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 13, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 18, 2014

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 22, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

November 13, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 17, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Agreement Between EM-3000 and NonCon Robo Pachy F&A (CellChek XL)

    For Agreement between the two instruments, outcome measures include endothelial cell density (/mm2), coefficient of variation between the two instruments (SD x CD x 10-6, and percent hexagonality of cells in the measured visible field of view between the two instruments.

    1 day visit per subject.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Investigate Repeatability and Reproducibility between the EM-3000 and NonCon Robo Pachy F&A (CellChek XL) Specular Microscopes

    1 day visit per subject.

Study Arms (1)

Observational

Observational group exposure to three test devices and one comparative device. The test Konan Non-con Robo Pachy F\&A Specular Microscope.

Other: Observational

Interventions

Intervention is observational to two different diagnostic devices for which comparative readings of the corneal endothelium are being measured; the test device- the EM-3000 Specular Microscope against the Konan Robo-pachy F\&A Specular Microscope.

Observational

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study plan calls for 75 subjects divided into three sub-groups, young healthy (18-50 yrs), older healthy (51-80 yrs), and pathologic adults (29-80 years).

You may qualify if:

  • Eyes with one of the following corneal conditions:
  • Non-pathologic younger eyes (18-50 yrs) Non-pathologic older eyes (51-80 yrs) Pathologic adult eyes (29-80)

You may not qualify if:

  • Seriously ill or unconscious subject, mentally ill person, mentally handicapped person, person who is unable to read or write.
  • Non-Pathologic subjects who have the following conditions :
  • History of corneal transplant
  • Long term Fuch's dystrophy (and other corneal endothelial dystrophy)
  • Guttata
  • History of cataract or ocular surgical procedures that render the cornea opaque or otherwise impact its ability to be imaged using the investigational device
  • Long term PMMA contact lens use longer than 5 years
  • Pathologic subjects
  • Keratoconus

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Corneal Diseases

Interventions

Watchful Waiting

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Outcome Assessment, Health CareOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services Administration

Study Officials

  • Melissa Bailey, OD

    Professor, College of Optometry

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2014

First Posted

November 18, 2014

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion

July 1, 2015

Study Completion

July 1, 2015

Last Updated

August 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Locations