NCT03512301

Brief Summary

Cognitive impairment is a significant health problem in the United States, resulting in costs over $100 billion a year. We will provide an efficient, effective, and financially intelligent solution to Primary Care Physician's to identify cognitive impairment in the earliest stages, delay progression through appropriate treatment, and to afford patients the opportunity to make future plans at a time when symptoms are mild and patients are able to make informed decisions concerning financial and life activities. This has the potential to delay devastating effects of cognitive impairment, and to lessen the financial burden on the health care system in the United States.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
773

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 17, 2018

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 30, 2018

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 8, 2019

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2023

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 26, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 26, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

April 17, 2018

Results QC Date

February 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

June 24, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Agreement Analysis (Agreement to Reference Standard) - Test Group

    Comparison (positive and negative percent agreement, confidence interval estimates, and quadratic weighted kappa) between CAMCI and clinical adjudication classifications for the Test group. Power calculations for agreement were assessed for Cohen Kappa's assuming at least 75% Normals with 80% power and .05 significance level, finding that we were sufficiently powered with at least 120 individuals in the test set, for a Kappa of at least 0.3.

    baseline

  • Agreement Analysis (Agreement to Non-Reference Standard) - Test Group

    Linear regression agreement analysis (linear regression equation and confidence intervals, and Pearson correlation) between CAMCI and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for the Test group. Comparison (positive and negative percent agreement, confidence interval estimates, and quadratic weighted kappa) between CAMCI and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for the Test group. CAMCI Scores ranged from 0-50, higher scores mean better outcome. MoCA scores ranged from 0-30, higher scores mean better outcome. Power calculations for agreement were assessed for Cohen Kappa's assuming at least 75% Normals with 80% power and .05 significance level, finding that we were sufficiently powered with at least 120 individuals in the test set, for a Kappa of at least 0.3.

    baseline

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Change Metric (Measure of Significant Change)

    baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months post baseline

Study Arms (1)

CAMCI Validation

EXPERIMENTAL

Completion of computerized tasks (Computer Assessment of Memory and Cognitive Impairment) and traditional neuropsychological tests administered via paper-pencil method by a trained administrator

Device: CAMCIDiagnostic Test: MoCADiagnostic Test: Clinical Adjudication

Interventions

CAMCIDEVICE

CAMCI is a computerized screening tool for the assessment of cognitive status. CAMCI accurately assesses cognitive performance using standard neuropsychological tests of memory, attention, and executive ability modified for computer administration, and an innovative Virtual Environment task, testing domains such as incidental memory, not easily assessed using paper-pencil tests. Computer-administered tasks ensure standard administration and scoring, avoiding inter-site and inter-examiner variability. The CAMCI battery consists of tasks testing multiple aspects of cognitive function, and a series of self-report questions administered via tablet computer. Using touchscreen technology for response input, CAMCI takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete.

Also known as: Computer Assessment of Memory and Cognitive Impairment
CAMCI Validation
MoCADIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a rapid screening tool used to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI), assessing cognitive domains (visuospatial skills, executive function, memory, attention, language, and orientation). Individual test scores are summed into a total score from 0 (worst) to 30 (best). Individuals may achieve any score within that range. Individual test scores are not reported. Scores: 26-30 considered Normal; 19-25 may suggest Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI); 10-18 can suggest moderate impairment; \< 10 may indicate severe impairment

Also known as: Montreal Cognitive Assessment
CAMCI Validation
Clinical AdjudicationDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Cognitive status assessed by traditional neuropsychological tests measuring visuospatial skills, executive function, memory, attention, language, orientation. Results compared to age-adjusted norms, reviewed by expert neuropsychologists for consensus classification, per Univ of Pittsburgh Alzheimers Disease Research Ctr and Ntl Alzheimers Coordinating Ctr, and Alzheimer's Assoc criteria. Final classification adjusted per clinical judgment. Impaired: ≥3 scores ≥2SD below norms Indeterminate: ≤2 scores \>1SD below norms Normal: Neither criteria met. Total and domain scores not reported.

Also known as: Neuropsychological Tests
CAMCI Validation

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 95 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed informed consent
  • Adequate visual and auditory acuity to allow neuropsychological testing
  • Able to read, write and understand study and test requirements
  • Within the age range of 60+

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant neurologic disease, such as multi-infarct dementia, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis or head trauma
  • History of major depression or other major psychiatric disorder, such as, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
  • History of consuming 5 or more alcoholic drinks per day on a regular basis
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score \<10

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

Psychology Software Tools

Sharpsburg, Pennsylvania, 15215, United States

Location

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22904, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Dysfunction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Limitations and Caveats

Baseline and Follow-Up assessment targets were not reached due to suspension of the trial during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sites prohibited in-person testing for a period of 6 months, resulting in withdrawal of subjects and loss of follow-up data according to the planned timeline. Additionally, after restart, the year 3 award restricted activities during the last 6 months of the project to analysis only, limiting testing duration. By design, the trial required 36 months to complete all follow-ups.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Anthony Zuccolotto
Organization
Psychology Software Tools, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Anthony Zuccolotto

    Psychology Software Tools

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Grants Administration Manager

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2018

First Posted

April 30, 2018

Study Start

August 8, 2019

Primary Completion

May 31, 2023

Study Completion

May 31, 2023

Last Updated

June 26, 2025

Results First Posted

June 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Quality-controlled raw data as well as processed data used in publications will be made available. Shared data will include computerized task scores, neuropsychological test scores, and full analytical codes used to process and analyze the data. Workflows will be described and documented to allow replication of results from the raw data. Data and corresponding documentation will be made available through Open Science Framework, in addition to any potential requirements on software sharing by journals. The PI or Co-Investigators will disseminate results from this research through presentations at public lectures, scientific institutions and meetings, and/or publication in major journals. The PI and Co-Investigators will adhere to the NIH Grants Policy on Sharing of Unique Research Resources including the Sharing of Biomedical Research Resources: Guidelines for Recipients of NIH Grants and Contracts on Obtaining and Disseminating Biomedical Research Resources.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will be deposited into the repository indicated above as soon as possible, but no later than 4 years after the end of the award project period. The Small Business Act provides authority for NIH to protect from disclosure and nongovernmental use all Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) data developed from work performed under an SBIR funding agreement for a period of 4 years after the closeout of either a phase I or phase II grant unless NIH obtains permission from the awardee to disclose these data. The data rights protection period lapses only upon expiration of the protection period applicable to the SBIR award, or by agreement between the small business concern and NIH.
Access Criteria
PST will identify where the data will be available and how to access the data in any publications and presentations about these data, as well as acknowledge the repository and funding source in any publications and presentations. In addition, PST will abide by the policies and procedures required by the repository indicated above, fully consistent with NIH data sharing policies and applicable laws and regulations.

Locations