CAMCI: Advancing the Use of Computerized Screening in Healthcare
2 other identifiers
interventional
773
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Cognitive impairment is a significant health problem in the United States, resulting in costs over $100 billion a year. We will provide an efficient, effective, and financially intelligent solution to Primary Care Physician's to identify cognitive impairment in the earliest stages, delay progression through appropriate treatment, and to afford patients the opportunity to make future plans at a time when symptoms are mild and patients are able to make informed decisions concerning financial and life activities. This has the potential to delay devastating effects of cognitive impairment, and to lessen the financial burden on the health care system in the United States.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 17, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 26, 2025
CompletedJune 26, 2025
June 1, 2025
3.8 years
April 17, 2018
February 14, 2025
June 24, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Agreement Analysis (Agreement to Reference Standard) - Test Group
Comparison (positive and negative percent agreement, confidence interval estimates, and quadratic weighted kappa) between CAMCI and clinical adjudication classifications for the Test group. Power calculations for agreement were assessed for Cohen Kappa's assuming at least 75% Normals with 80% power and .05 significance level, finding that we were sufficiently powered with at least 120 individuals in the test set, for a Kappa of at least 0.3.
baseline
Agreement Analysis (Agreement to Non-Reference Standard) - Test Group
Linear regression agreement analysis (linear regression equation and confidence intervals, and Pearson correlation) between CAMCI and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for the Test group. Comparison (positive and negative percent agreement, confidence interval estimates, and quadratic weighted kappa) between CAMCI and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for the Test group. CAMCI Scores ranged from 0-50, higher scores mean better outcome. MoCA scores ranged from 0-30, higher scores mean better outcome. Power calculations for agreement were assessed for Cohen Kappa's assuming at least 75% Normals with 80% power and .05 significance level, finding that we were sufficiently powered with at least 120 individuals in the test set, for a Kappa of at least 0.3.
baseline
Other Outcomes (1)
Change Metric (Measure of Significant Change)
baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months post baseline
Study Arms (1)
CAMCI Validation
EXPERIMENTALCompletion of computerized tasks (Computer Assessment of Memory and Cognitive Impairment) and traditional neuropsychological tests administered via paper-pencil method by a trained administrator
Interventions
CAMCI is a computerized screening tool for the assessment of cognitive status. CAMCI accurately assesses cognitive performance using standard neuropsychological tests of memory, attention, and executive ability modified for computer administration, and an innovative Virtual Environment task, testing domains such as incidental memory, not easily assessed using paper-pencil tests. Computer-administered tasks ensure standard administration and scoring, avoiding inter-site and inter-examiner variability. The CAMCI battery consists of tasks testing multiple aspects of cognitive function, and a series of self-report questions administered via tablet computer. Using touchscreen technology for response input, CAMCI takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a rapid screening tool used to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI), assessing cognitive domains (visuospatial skills, executive function, memory, attention, language, and orientation). Individual test scores are summed into a total score from 0 (worst) to 30 (best). Individuals may achieve any score within that range. Individual test scores are not reported. Scores: 26-30 considered Normal; 19-25 may suggest Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI); 10-18 can suggest moderate impairment; \< 10 may indicate severe impairment
Cognitive status assessed by traditional neuropsychological tests measuring visuospatial skills, executive function, memory, attention, language, orientation. Results compared to age-adjusted norms, reviewed by expert neuropsychologists for consensus classification, per Univ of Pittsburgh Alzheimers Disease Research Ctr and Ntl Alzheimers Coordinating Ctr, and Alzheimer's Assoc criteria. Final classification adjusted per clinical judgment. Impaired: ≥3 scores ≥2SD below norms Indeterminate: ≤2 scores \>1SD below norms Normal: Neither criteria met. Total and domain scores not reported.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent
- Adequate visual and auditory acuity to allow neuropsychological testing
- Able to read, write and understand study and test requirements
- Within the age range of 60+
You may not qualify if:
- Significant neurologic disease, such as multi-infarct dementia, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis or head trauma
- History of major depression or other major psychiatric disorder, such as, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
- History of consuming 5 or more alcoholic drinks per day on a regular basis
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score \<10
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Psychology Software Tools, Inc.lead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (4)
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Psychology Software Tools
Sharpsburg, Pennsylvania, 15215, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22904, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Baseline and Follow-Up assessment targets were not reached due to suspension of the trial during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sites prohibited in-person testing for a period of 6 months, resulting in withdrawal of subjects and loss of follow-up data according to the planned timeline. Additionally, after restart, the year 3 award restricted activities during the last 6 months of the project to analysis only, limiting testing duration. By design, the trial required 36 months to complete all follow-ups.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anthony Zuccolotto
- Organization
- Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anthony Zuccolotto
Psychology Software Tools
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Grants Administration Manager
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 17, 2018
First Posted
April 30, 2018
Study Start
August 8, 2019
Primary Completion
May 31, 2023
Study Completion
May 31, 2023
Last Updated
June 26, 2025
Results First Posted
June 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be deposited into the repository indicated above as soon as possible, but no later than 4 years after the end of the award project period. The Small Business Act provides authority for NIH to protect from disclosure and nongovernmental use all Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) data developed from work performed under an SBIR funding agreement for a period of 4 years after the closeout of either a phase I or phase II grant unless NIH obtains permission from the awardee to disclose these data. The data rights protection period lapses only upon expiration of the protection period applicable to the SBIR award, or by agreement between the small business concern and NIH.
- Access Criteria
- PST will identify where the data will be available and how to access the data in any publications and presentations about these data, as well as acknowledge the repository and funding source in any publications and presentations. In addition, PST will abide by the policies and procedures required by the repository indicated above, fully consistent with NIH data sharing policies and applicable laws and regulations.
Quality-controlled raw data as well as processed data used in publications will be made available. Shared data will include computerized task scores, neuropsychological test scores, and full analytical codes used to process and analyze the data. Workflows will be described and documented to allow replication of results from the raw data. Data and corresponding documentation will be made available through Open Science Framework, in addition to any potential requirements on software sharing by journals. The PI or Co-Investigators will disseminate results from this research through presentations at public lectures, scientific institutions and meetings, and/or publication in major journals. The PI and Co-Investigators will adhere to the NIH Grants Policy on Sharing of Unique Research Resources including the Sharing of Biomedical Research Resources: Guidelines for Recipients of NIH Grants and Contracts on Obtaining and Disseminating Biomedical Research Resources.