The Everyday Function Intervention Trial
EFIT
Assessing Cognitive and Psychosocial Mechanisms of Useful Field of View Cognitive Training Using Ecological Momentary Assessment
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Loss of independence, cognitive decline, and difficulties in everyday function are areas of great concern for older adults and their families. From a public health perspective, successful efforts that enable older adults to age within their homes, as compared to nursing homes, will save an estimated $80 billion dollars per year. Cognitive training is one intervention that maintains cognition, everyday function, and health. Although clearly an important and effective intervention, the mediators, or mechanisms, underlying this program are unknown. Our overall objective is to assess the cognitive and psychosocial factors within daily life that account for the transfer of one form of cognitive training to everyday function. This exploratory double-blind trial will randomize older adults to 20 hours of cognitive training or cognitively stimulating activities. The investigators will assess cognitive and psychosocial factors before, during, and after training within daily life. The investigators will then compare such factors and assess how they impact the transfer of cognitive training to everyday functioning. The investigators will also include an eligible sub group of the EFIT participants who will have functional MRI brain scans and sleep evaluation using the Sleep Profiler, a clinically approved device, at pre and post brain training. The investigators will also monitor daily activity in this sub group using FitBIt watches. Our central hypothesis is that improvements in daily processing speed and attention, key components of higher order cognitive functions, will have the strongest relationship with everyday function changes. This exploratory study is the first of its kind and will be used to provide important data relevant to a future larger randomized controlled trial examining mediators of cognitive training in a representative sample of adults. Additionally, all data collection, with the exception of MRI, can be completed remotely within the participant's home. This information will assist in the future development of more effective home- and community-based interventions that maintain everyday function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 27, 2022
CompletedOctober 2, 2023
September 1, 2023
1.8 years
November 18, 2020
September 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline Useful Field of View (UFOV) test at 14 and 26 weeks
This computerized assessment includes four subtests assessing processing speed, divided attention and selective attention scored in ms.
Baseline, Immediate Post-test at 14 weeks, and 3 month follow-up at 26 weeks
Change from Baseline Daily Everyday Cognitive Assessment (DECA) at 14 and 26 weeks
This computerized task assesses everyday function across simulated everyday tasks of medical, nutrition, and problem solving tasks. Task accuracy and speed are recorded.
Baseline, Immediate Post-test at 14 weeks, and 3 month follow-up at 26 weeks
Change from Baseline iFunction at 14 and 26 weeks
This computerized task assesses everyday function across simulated everyday tasks of medical, travel, and communication tasks. An overall score reflecting time and accuracy (i.e., efficiency index) is calculated to reflect performance across the ifunction subtests the proprietary software determines the score. Higher scores are better for efficiency index.
Baseline, Immediate Post-test at 14 weeks, and 3 month follow-up at 26 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change from Baseline Objective sleep at 14 weeks
Baseline and Immediate Post-test at 14 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Cognitive Training
EXPERIMENTAL20 hours of computerized brain exercises
Cognitively Stimulating Activities
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 hours of computerized brain exercises
Interventions
20 hours of computerized activities designed to improve processing speed and divided attention
20 hours of traditional computer games
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Clemson Universitylead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Pennsylvania State University
State College, Pennsylvania, 16802, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2020
First Posted
December 3, 2020
Study Start
January 5, 2021
Primary Completion
October 27, 2022
Study Completion
October 27, 2022
Last Updated
October 2, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share