Study Stopped
High incidence of fraudulent enrollment.
Family Planning Ahead
1 other identifier
interventional
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Family Planning Ahead is a study that aims to improve decision-making about postpartum contraception. Family Planning Ahead will test two different strategies: a patient decision aid and a patient information leaflet.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 22, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 23, 2018
CompletedJanuary 9, 2019
January 1, 2019
5 months
April 10, 2018
January 7, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perceived support in decision-making
The extent to which the person feels they received adequate support and advice without pressure to make a decision about postpartum contraceptive methods, measured using adapted versions of the Support subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale (O'Connor, 1993).
T2 (Approximately 7-11 weeks after self-reported estimated due date)
Secondary Outcomes (30)
Perceptions of being informed
T0 (immediately following study enrollment); T1 (one week following study enrollment)
Values clarity
T0 (immediately following study enrollment); T1 (one week following study enrollment)
Decisional uncertainty
T0 (immediately following study enrollment); T1 (one week following study enrollment)
Decision self-efficacy
T0 (immediately following study enrollment); T1 (one week following study enrollment)
Intended contraceptive method(s): LARC vs. other
T0 (immediately following study enrollment); T1 (one week following study enrollment)
- +25 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Patient Decision Aid
EXPERIMENTALBirth Control After Pregnancy patient decision aid and supporting document
Patient Information Leaflet
ACTIVE COMPARATORPostpartum Birth Control patient information leaflet
Interventions
A 27-page patient decision aid in portable document format (and an accompanying 3-page supporting document in portable document format) hosted online.
A 4-page patient information leaflet in portable document format and text format hosted online.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Currently pregnant
- Between 28 and 38 weeks' gestation at the time of enrollment
- Estimated due date in March, April, May, or June 2018
- years or older
- Can read and write English
- Live in the United States
- Share a valid email address for study purposes
You may not qualify if:
- Not currently pregnant
- Less than 28 weeks' or more than 38 weeks' gestation at the time of enrollment
- Estimated due date earlier than March 2018 or later than June 2018
- Under 15 years
- Can not read and write English
- Do not live in the United States
- Do not share a valid email address for study purposes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Internet (Dartmouth College)
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
Related Publications (7)
Dehlendorf C, Henderson JT, Vittinghoff E, Grumbach K, Levy K, Schmittdiel J, Lee J, Schillinger D, Steinauer J. Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):78.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.173. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
PMID: 26827879BACKGROUNDThompson R, Manski R, Donnelly KZ, Stevens G, Agusti D, Banach M, Boardman MB, Brady P, Colon Bradt C, Foster T, Johnson DJ, Li Z, Norsigian J, Nothnagle M, Olson AL, Shepherd HL, Stern LF, Tosteson TD, Trevena L, Upadhya KK, Elwyn G. Right For Me: protocol for a cluster randomised trial of two interventions for facilitating shared decision-making about contraceptive methods. BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e017830. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017830.
PMID: 29061624BACKGROUNDDugan E, Trachtenberg F, Hall MA. Development of abbreviated measures to assess patient trust in a physician, a health insurer, and the medical profession. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct 3;5:64. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-64.
PMID: 16202125BACKGROUNDBarr PJ, Thompson R, Walsh T, Grande SW, Ozanne EM, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 3;16(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3085.
PMID: 24389354BACKGROUNDBennett C, Graham ID, Kristjansson E, Kearing SA, Clay KF, O'Connor AM. Validation of a preparation for decision making scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jan;78(1):130-3. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
PMID: 19560303BACKGROUNDO'Connor, A. M. (1995). Decision Self Efficacy Scale: User manual. Retrieved from https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decision_SelfEfficacy.pdf
BACKGROUNDO'Connor, A. (2010). Decisional Conflict Scale: User manual. Retrieved from https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decisional_Conflict.pdf
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rachel Thompson, PhD
Dartmouth College
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, The Dartmouth Institute
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2018
First Posted
April 18, 2018
Study Start
March 22, 2018
Primary Completion
August 23, 2018
Study Completion
August 23, 2018
Last Updated
January 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
The investigators will make an anonymized copy of the final participant-level data set available to others for research purposes, either via data sharing on request or digital repository deposit.