UCSF College Health Study on Contraceptive Training and Education at Community Colleges
UCSF College Health Study: A Cluster Randomized Trial on Contraceptive Training and Education at Community Colleges
1 other identifier
interventional
2,086
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to measure whether a training and education intervention for clinic staff and young women aged 18-25 on contraceptive methods, including intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the implant, will result in greater contraceptive knowledge and access among students in community colleges.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 29, 2024
CompletedJune 15, 2025
June 1, 2025
5.1 years
March 21, 2018
June 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in student knowledge of full range of contraceptive methods (questionnaire)
The outcome is measured by whether student knows of reversible methods including male condom, female condom, oral contraceptive pill, transdermal patch, vaginal ring, Depo-provera injectable, intrauterine device, subdermal implant, and emergency contraception.
Baseline, immediate post educational intervention session
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in student access to contraceptive services over 12 months, measured as whether student knows of or visited health services for contraceptives (questionnaire)
Baseline, 12 months
Change in willingness to use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) (questionnaire)
Baseline, immediate post educational intervention session
Change in LARC use over 12 months (questionnaire)
Baseline, 12 months
Dual condom use at last sex, measured by student report of condom use together with another method of birth control at last vaginal sex (questionnaire)
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Other Outcomes (13)
Unintended pregnancy incidence
12 months
Certificate or degree completion (ordinal outcome including categories for on-time progression for graduation, delayed progression or dropout), measured by student report (questionnaire)
12 months
Change in receipt of public assistance (questionnaire)
Baseline, 12 months
- +10 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Contraceptive Training and Education
EXPERIMENTALColleges assigned to this arm receive a one-day UCSF Continuing Medical Education (CME # MMC18087) accredited training on contraceptives and technical assistance. The training is for staff at the student health center and local health centers where they refer for contraceptive services. Students attending colleges assigned to this arm receive education about contraceptive methods and how to access services.
Nutrition Education
PLACEBO COMPARATORStudents attending colleges assigned to this arm receive nutrition education about the impacts of sugar on health.
Interventions
Staff at the student health center and local health centers where they refer for contraceptive services will receive a CME-accredited education and training session and technical assistance. The one-day session emphasizes evidence-based and patient-centered contraceptive counseling and provision. Students attending colleges assigned to the intervention arm will receive materials and resources designed to educate young people about contraceptive methods and where to access services.
Students attending colleges assigned to the nutrition education arm will receive materials and resources designed to educate young people about the impacts of sugar on health.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- This study involves two groups of human subjects: students at 28 community colleges and staff at the student health center and referral clinics.
- Students must be:
- Female;
- Age 18-25;
- Speaks English;
- Sexually active (vaginal sex with a male partner) in the last year;
- Not currently pregnant;
- Does not want to become pregnant in the next 12 months;
- At risk of pregnancy (including not sterilized);
- Enrolled in the current term at the participating community college;
- First-time college students, meaning no college enrollment prior to the current academic year; and
- Willing to be contacted by email and telephone over the next 12 months.
- Clinic staff must:
- Be employed by a participating clinic; and
- Offer clinical care, counseling or education for contraception at the clinic.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94118, United States
Related Publications (28)
Stanwood NL, Bradley KA. Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1417-22. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000245447.56585.a0.
PMID: 17138775BACKGROUNDFrost JJ, Lindberg LD, Finer LB. Young adults' contraceptive knowledge, norms and attitudes: associations with risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Jun;44(2):107-16. doi: 10.1363/4410712. Epub 2012 May 8.
PMID: 22681426BACKGROUNDFiner LB, Zolna MR. Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008. Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S43-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301416. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
PMID: 24354819BACKGROUNDTrieu SL, Bratton S, Hopp Marshak H. Sexual and reproductive health behaviors of California community college students. J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(8):744-50. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2010.540764.
PMID: 21950256BACKGROUNDHarper CC, Rocca CH, Thompson KM, Morfesis J, Goodman S, Darney PD, Westhoff CL, Speidel JJ. Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):562-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62460-0. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
PMID: 26091743BACKGROUNDSundstrom B, Baker-Whitcomb A, DeMaria AL. A qualitative analysis of long-acting reversible contraception. Matern Child Health J. 2015 Jul;19(7):1507-14. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1655-0.
PMID: 25424456BACKGROUNDThompson KM, Rocca CH, Kohn JE, Goodman S, Stern L, Blum M, Speidel JJ, Darney PD, Harper CC. Public Funding for Contraception, Provider Training, and Use of Highly Effective Contraceptives: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Am J Public Health. 2016 Mar;106(3):541-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.303001. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
PMID: 26794168BACKGROUNDLandry DJ, Wei J, Frost JJ. Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use. Contraception. 2008 Jul;78(1):42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 May 29.
PMID: 18555817BACKGROUNDGibbs SE, Rocca CH, Bednarek P, Thompson KMJ, Darney PD, Harper CC. Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Counseling and Use for Older Adolescents and Nulliparous Women. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Dec;59(6):703-709. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
PMID: 27665153BACKGROUNDEl Ayadi AM, Rocca CH, Kohn JE, Velazquez D, Blum M, Newmann SJ, Harper CC. The impact of an IUD and implant intervention on dual method use among young women: Results from a cluster randomized trial. Prev Med. 2017 Jan;94:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
PMID: 27773708BACKGROUNDRocca CH, Thompson KM, Goodman S, Westhoff CL, Harper CC. Funding policies and postabortion long-acting reversible contraception: results from a cluster randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):716.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
PMID: 26692178BACKGROUNDHarper CC, Henderson JT, Raine TR, Goodman S, Darney PD, Thompson KM, Dehlendorf C, Speidel JJ. Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists. Fam Med. 2012 Oct;44(9):637-45.
PMID: 23027156BACKGROUNDKost K, Singh S, Vaughan B, Trussell J, Bankole A. Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception. 2008 Jan;77(1):10-21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.013. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
PMID: 18082661BACKGROUNDRocca CH, Harper CC. Do racial and ethnic differences in contraceptive attitudes and knowledge explain disparities in method use? Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Sep;44(3):150-8. doi: 10.1363/4415012. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
PMID: 22958659BACKGROUNDFiner LB, Zolna MR. Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
PMID: 26962904BACKGROUNDThompson KM, Stern L, Gelt M, Speidel JJ, Harper CC. Counseling for IUDs and implants: are health educators and clinicians on the same page? Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Dec;45(4):191-5. doi: 10.1363/4519113. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
PMID: 24325290BACKGROUNDHarper CC, Stratton L, Raine TR, Thompson K, Henderson JT, Blum M, Postlethwaite D, Speidel JJ. Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners. Prev Med. 2013 Dec;57(6):883-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
PMID: 24128950BACKGROUNDRocca CH, Goodman S, Grossman D, Cadwallader K, Thompson KMJ, Talmont E, Speidel JJ, Harper CC. Contraception after medication abortion in the United States: results from a cluster randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):107.e1-107.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
PMID: 28986072BACKGROUNDKavanaugh ML, Jerman J, Finer LB. Changes in Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Women, 2009-2012. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;126(5):917-927. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001094.
PMID: 26444110BACKGROUNDMoore PJ, Adler NE, Kegeles SM. Adolescents and the contraceptive pill: the impact of beliefs on intentions and use. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Sep;88(3 Suppl):48S-56S. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00244-x.
PMID: 8752228BACKGROUNDTrussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher R, Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W, Kowal D, Policar M, eds. Contraceptive technology, 20th edn. New York: Ardent Media, 2011: 779-863.
BACKGROUNDWhitaker AK, Johnson LM, Harwood B, Chiappetta L, Creinin MD, Gold MA. Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device. Contraception. 2008 Sep;78(3):211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.119. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
PMID: 18692611BACKGROUNDGolden SD, Earp JA. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health Educ Behav. 2012 Jun;39(3):364-72. doi: 10.1177/1090198111418634. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
PMID: 22267868BACKGROUNDFoster DG, Biggs MA, Ralph L, Gerdts C, Roberts S, Glymour MM. Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2018 Mar;108(3):407-413. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304247. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
PMID: 29345993BACKGROUNDDehlendorf C, Henderson JT, Vittinghoff E, Steinauer J, Hessler D. Development of a patient-reported measure of the interpersonal quality of family planning care. Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
PMID: 28935217BACKGROUNDMorse SM, Yarger J, Hopkins K, Hecht HK, Rossetto I, Perez LAT, Raymond-Flesch M, Tyler L, Lizarraga M, Hargrave-Bouagnon A, Harper CC. Intimate partner violence and delays in obtaining contraception among young people in California and Texas. Contraception. 2025 Dec;152:111203. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111203. Epub 2025 Sep 4.
PMID: 40914262DERIVEDHarper CC, Yarger J, Mangurian C, Hopkins K, Rossetto I, Elmes S, Hecht HK, Sanchez A, Hernandez R, Shokat M, Steinberg JR. Mental Health Distress and Delayed Contraception Among Older Adolescents and Young Adults. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Jul;33(7):870-878. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0549. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
PMID: 38465503DERIVEDYarger J, Hopkins K, Elmes S, Rossetto I, De La Melena S, McCulloch CE, White K, Harper CC. Perceived Access to Contraception via Telemedicine Among Young Adults: Inequities by Food and Housing Insecurity. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):302-308. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07669-0. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
PMID: 35657468DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cynthia C. Harper, PhD
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2018
First Posted
May 9, 2018
Study Start
April 9, 2018
Primary Completion
May 31, 2023
Study Completion
May 29, 2024
Last Updated
June 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06