Efficacy of TAP Block in Cesarean Section Patients
A Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of TAP Block in Cesarean Section Patients When Compared to Placebo
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
TAP Block done with 2 different concentrations of bupivacaine and placebo
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jun 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 13, 2018
CompletedNovember 13, 2018
November 1, 2018
4 months
April 27, 2015
April 10, 2018
November 8, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Using Either 0.5% or 0.25% Bupivacaine on Analgesia for Cesarean Section Patients When Compared to Placebo.
The total the number of Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) boluses used by the patients postoperatively within 24 hours
0-24 hours
Study Arms (3)
TAP using Bupivacaine 0.5%
ACTIVE COMPARATORFollowing completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.5% was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
TAP using Bupivacaine 0.25%
ACTIVE COMPARATORFollowing completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.25% was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORFollowing completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of normal saline was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
Interventions
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.5% was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.25% was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of normal saline was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy pregnant women
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to local anesthetics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New York Methodist Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11215, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The investigators used epidural morphine in all 3 groups, so they were unable to assess whether TAP block in a multimodal analgesic regimen without the neuraxial opioids provide advantage over the multimodal analgesic regimen with neuraxial opioids.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Joel Yarmush
- Organization
- New York Methodist Hospital
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Adel Guirguis, MD, MS
New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The randomization sheet was given to someone who is not involved in the study, also the person who prepare the medicine is not involved in the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2015
First Posted
April 11, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 13, 2018
Results First Posted
November 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to share IPD with other researchers