Using Video Gaming to Evaluate Front of Pack Labeling With Children
Munchy Monster: Using Video Gaming to Objectively Evaluate Front of Pack Labeling Strategies for School-aged Children
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Regulated nutrition information is complex, using decimal places and percentages. Front of pack (FOP) labels provide simplified nutrition information on the front of packages. It has been suggested that the traditional approach to nutrition labeling is difficult for children to use; this is unfortunate as childhood is a critical time for developing long-lasting eating habits and children influence purchase decisions. Materials and Methods Children aged 6-10 played a video game in which participants fed "Munchy Monster" the healthier of two cereal products presented on a computer screen. Across trials the FOP format varied in a 2 (color/no color) x 2 (facial emotion icon/no facial icon) factorial design. Within a trial both cereals presented the same FOP format, with one cereal healthier than the other. Results Data suggest that color coding and/or facial icon significantly benefits selection accuracy and speed, particularly for the youngest children. Minimal training (awareness of the FOPs existence and that it might contain nutrition information) further improved accuracy and speed of responses. Conclusions FOPs that leverage visual indicators assist even young children in assessing the nutritional value of a product.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2018
CompletedMarch 29, 2018
March 1, 2018
2 months
September 18, 2017
March 22, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Correct selections
The correct selection of the healthier stimulus
During the one hour test period
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time to correct selection
During the one hour test period
Study Arms (2)
Uninstructed Group
OTHERFor the first block of participants recruited (39, one of which withdrew from boredom), no overt reference was made regarding the FOP labels that were present on the images that participants viewed during the course of the video game. Participants comprising this block were referred to as "uninstructed."
Minimally trained
OTHERRealizing that subjects might not use the FOP during decision making when not informed that it contained nutrition information, we conducted a second experiment (N= 41) which provided minimal information about the FOP. These subjects (the "minimally instructed" group) were provided with further instruction. At the beginning of the experiment, in addition to being shown the basic premise of the game and told that Munchy preferred to eat healthy options, the researcher pointed to one of the FOPs and told children "this information might be helpful when you decide what's healthy."
Interventions
Color (present and absent) were crossed with facial icon (present and absent) for a total of four FOP label treatments. For each trial, both packages had the same FOP treatment, but one appeared at a "healthy level" while the second "unhealthy." Subjects were asked to choose the healthier option as quickly as possible. Accuracy and speed to correct selection both served as dependent variables.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age
- Legally sighted
- have parent or legal guardian present (written consent of parent)
- have transportation to the test site
- be willing to share contact information for reminders be willing to have deidentified data stored provide written or verbal assent (depending on the age of the child)
You may not qualify if:
- legally blind
- no assent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Packaging
East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Becker, PhD
Michigan State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Participants were handled differently in the methods. For the first block of participants, the FOP was not pointed out. For the second block, researchers merely pointed to the FOP and indicated that it might be helpful in decision making.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2017
First Posted
March 29, 2018
Study Start
February 2, 2016
Primary Completion
April 12, 2016
Study Completion
April 12, 2016
Last Updated
March 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Indefinitely upon publication
- Access Criteria
- will be shared as deidentified file upon publication
deidenitified file will be shared as supplemental file when published