Fine and Gross Motor Function and Relationship With Muscle Tone in Older Adults With and Without Dementia
1 other identifier
interventional
122
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate changes in gait, balance, fine motor function, and muscle tone, and (2) to find out if there is a correlation between muscle tone/presence of paratonia and motor function (gross and fine) in mild and moderate dementia.Three groups of participants were included in the study: healthy elderly (n=60), participants with mild dementia (n=31) and participants with moderate dementia (n=31). Measurements of fine motor function, balance, gait, presence of paratonia and muscle tone measurements were performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2018
CompletedDecember 18, 2023
December 1, 2023
2.9 years
March 13, 2018
December 12, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
walking speed
gait speed parameter
through study completion, an average of 3 years
step regularity
gait parameter representing regularity, autocorrelation (method Moe-Nilssen 2004), value between 0 and 1, with 1 representing perfect regularity
through study completion, an average of 3 years
mediolateral jerk
balance smoothness and coordination, lower jerk values correspond with better smoothness of balance
through study completion, an average of 3 years
anteroposterior jerk
balance smoothness and coordination, lower jerk values correspond with better smoothness of balance
through study completion, an average of 3 years
Fine motor function
score on the Purdue pegboard test, maximal amount of (pairs of) pegs placed in 30 seconds (max. 25)
through study completion, an average of 3 years
presence of paratonia
Paratonia Assessment Instrument, resistance against passive movements of the four limbs is evaluated (Hobbelen 2008)
through study completion, an average of 3 years
MyotonPRO measurement of muscle tone
MyotonPRO measurement
through study completion, an average of 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
MyotonPRO measurement of elasticity
through study completion, an average of 3 years
MyotonPRO measurement of mechanical stiffness
through study completion, an average of 3 years
Study Arms (3)
HC
OTHERHealthy controls, i.e. older adults without cognitive impairment
MiD
OTHERolder adults with mild dementia
MoD
OTHERolder adults with moderate dementia
Interventions
accelerometric assessment of gait (Dynaport Hybrid): 7m walk in 3 conditions (normal pace, fast, double task)
accelerometric assessment of balance (Dynaport Hybrid) during 10 seconds trial in 3 conditions (side-by-side, semitandem, tandem)
assessment of fine motor skills with Purdue Pegboard, with dominant hand, non-dominant hand and bimanual
diagnosis of paratonia based on passive movement of the four limbs
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age \>= 65 years
- walk independently for at least 11 meters
- HC: no cognitive deterioration, MiD: dementia, Global Deterioration Scale\<5, MoD: dementia, Global Deterioration Scale 5 or 6
You may not qualify if:
- recent (≤ 6 months) orthopedic surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
Study Sites (1)
Vakgroep Revaki - Ghent University
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2018
First Posted
March 27, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12