Contrast-enhanced Diffusion-weighted MRI to Detect Liver Metastases in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
DIA-PANC
Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Diffusion-weighted MRI for Liver Metastases of Pancreatic Cancer: Towards Adequate Staging and Follow-up of Pancreatic Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
465
4 countries
7
Brief Summary
Given the dismal prognosis of pancreatic cancer, detecting liver metastases early can avoid inappropriate therapy with the associated substantial risks, long-term hospital admissions and high costs, but without survival benefit. The current standard of diagnostic workup with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) has a poor sensitivity (38-76%) for the detection of liver metastases. As more sophisticated and expensive treatment options emerge, better staging of pancreatic cancer is needed to avoid unnecessary procedures and select the most appropriate treatment strategy. New imaging modalities are available, but their value in staging of pancreatic cancer has not been evaluated yet. Therefore prospective imaging studies are necessary. The main aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced diffusion-weighted MRI (CE-DW-MRI) in the detection of liver metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer compared to a reference standard of histopathology and follow up imaging. The study is an international, multicenter prospective cohort study (inclusion of patients until 138 patients with liver metastases are included, with a total maximum of 465 patients). Patients with pancreatic cancer will undergo additional CE-DW-MRI within two weeks from the CECT. CECT and CE-DW-MRI will be read independently by two radiologists. Suspected liver lesions on CECT and/or CE-DW-MRI will be biopsied to obtain histopathology as reference standard. For liver lesions without histopathologic proof of metastases a paired follow-up CECT and CE-DW-MRI serve as a composite reference standard. Pancreatic resection will be pursued in patients without proven liver or distant metastases. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease will be offered palliative treatment. Follow up CECT and CE-DW-MRI will be performed in all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedSeptember 21, 2021
October 1, 2020
4 years
February 28, 2018
September 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy of CE-DW-MRI
Sensitivity and Specificity of CE-DW-MRI for the detection of liver metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer compared to CECT.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Detection of metastasis on CE-DW-MRI in follow-up (3, 6 and 12 months after baseline)
3, 6 and 12 months
Assess local resectability
Baseline
Other Outcomes (4)
One year survival
Maximum 1 year
Median survival
Maximum 1 year
Disease free survival
Maximum 1 year
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients with (suspected) PDAC
OTHERPatients with (suspected) pancreatic cancer will undergo additional Contrast-enhanced Diffusion-weighted MRI (CE-DW-MRI) within two weeks from the CECT. Suspected liver lesions on CECT and/or CE-DW-MRI will be biopsied to obtain histopathology as reference standard. For liver lesions without histopathologic proof of metastases a paired follow-up CECT and CE-DW-MRI serve as a composite reference standard. Follow up CECT and CE-DW-MRI will be performed in all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Interventions
An MRI scan enhanced with intravenous contrast and with diffusion imaging at several B-values
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years and older
- clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer
- written (signed and dated) informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- previous treatment for pancreatic cancer (e.g. chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, ablation therapy)
- concomitant malignancies, except for adequately treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Subjects with prior malignancies must be disease-free for at least 5 years
- contra-indications to undergo CT (due to e.g. extreme claustrophobia, untreatable contrast allergy, renal function impairment)
- contra-indications to undergo MRI (due to e.g. claustrophobia, untreatable contrast allergy, or not MRI compatible medical devices)
- insufficient command of the Dutch language to be able to understand the patient information or fill in the questionnaires
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Centerlead
- Dutch Cancer Societycollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Konstantopouleio general hospital
Athens, Greece
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525GA, Netherlands
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, 5223 GZ, Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, 7512KZ, Netherlands
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
Madrid, Spain
Inselspital
Bern, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Litjens G, Riviere DM, van Geenen EJM, Radema SA, Brosens LAA, Prokop M, van Laarhoven CJHM, Hermans JJ. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced diffusion-weighted MRI for liver metastases of pancreatic cancer: towards adequate staging and follow-up of pancreatic cancer - DIA-PANC study: study protocol for an international, multicenter, diagnostic trial. BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 10;20(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07226-0.
PMID: 32778061DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John J. Hermans, dr. ir.
Radboudumc, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kees C.J.H.M. van Laarhoven, prof. dr.
Radboudumc, Department of Surgery
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2018
First Posted
March 19, 2018
Study Start
December 22, 2017
Primary Completion
January 1, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
September 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-10