Connect Your Needle to Your Phone to Increase EUS FNA Diagnostic Yield?
SMARTEUS
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Summary Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS FNA) is an established and recommended technique for diagnostic of solid pancreatic masses. The accuracy of the technique depends on the operator experience, lesion type and location, type of procedure sedation as well as procedure related technique factors (presence of elastography or contrast enhanced imaging, needle diameter, presence of stylet, use of suction and type of suction, the number and method of "to and fro" movements, the number of passes and the presence of a cytopathologist in the examination room). The relationship between the "to and fro" movement and the EUS FNA yield in solid pancreatic masses has only been explored in the literature in a subjective fashion, without accurately measuring the needle acceleration. Recently, a simple electronic sensor device connected by Bluetooth to a phone, has been proposed for teaching and research purposes. Among its sensors, it includes an accelerometer which can measure the instant scalar acceleration of an object and transmit it to the connected phone. By attaching this device to the EUS FNA needle, the investigators can accurately measure the instant scalar acceleration of the "to and fro" movements. The investigators propose a prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study on 51 patients with solid pancreatic masses to compare an EUS FNA "fast" sampling technique in which the needle acceleration is higher than 1 g to a "slow" technique where the needle acceleration is lower than 1g. The primary objective of the study is to compare the tissue acquisition rates and the histological diagnosis accuracy between the 2 methods "fast" and "slow". The secondary objectives of the study are to compare the cellularity and quality scores of the obtained specimens between the 2 methods. Another secondary objective is to find a linear relationship between the needle acceleration and the EUS FNA yield (histological diagnosis, sample cellularity and adequacy).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2020
CompletedJanuary 31, 2020
January 1, 2020
2.5 years
September 30, 2017
January 30, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Tissue acquisition rate of EUS FNA
Fraction of tissue acquisition from all included patients,for "fast" and "slow" passages
up to 12 months
Cytological diagnostic accuracy of EUS FNA, for "fast" and "slow" passages
Fraction of correct diagnosis from all included patients
up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Cellularity score of EUS FNA
up to 12 months
Quality of cytological specimen of EUS FNA
up to 12 months
The linear relationship between needle acceleration and outcomes 1,2,3 and 4
up to 12 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Subgroup analysis for trans-gastric and trans-duodenal route
up to 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Fast Pass First, Slow Pass Second
EXPERIMENTALEach patient will receive 2 EUS FNA passes, 1 "fast" and 1 "slow", with a 22 gauge EUS needle, with suction syringe, employing the fanning technique, 10 jabs for each pass. A "fast" pass has an advancing mean acceleration jab ("to" movement) higher than 1 g, while a "slow" pass has an advancing mean acceleration jab of less than 1 g (where 1 g equals 9.8 m/s2). Both movements will have a "slow" "fro" withdrawal movement, from the point of maximum advance into the lesion to the lesion entry site. For each patient, the passes order with be either done as "fast" pass first, "slow" pass second.
Slow Pass First - Fast Pass Second
EXPERIMENTALEach patient will receive 2 EUS FNA passes, 1 "fast" and 1 "slow", with a 22 gauge EUS needle, with suction syringe, employing the fanning technique, 10 jabs for each pass. A "fast" pass has an advancing mean acceleration jab ("to" movement) higher than 1 g, while a "slow" pass has an advancing mean acceleration jab of less than 1 g (where 1 g equals 9.8 m/s2). Both movements will have a "slow" "fro" withdrawal movement, from the point of maximum advance into the lesion to the lesion entry site. For each patient, the passes order with be either done as "slow" pass first, "fast" pass second.
Interventions
Patients with solid pancreatic masses fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to receive EUS FNA (endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a solid pancreatic lesion with diameter larger than 20mm, with or without a cystic component, with unknown histology;
- age above 18 years old;
- signed informed consent;
You may not qualify if:
- a solid pancreatic mass with a diameter less than 20mm or with known histology;
- a cystic pancreatic mass, without a solid component;
- coagulation disorder (international normalized ratio above 1.5, activated partial thromboplastin time above 42 seconds, platelet count less than 60000/mmc) or impossibility to stop antiaggregants or anticoagulants according to the European Society of Digestive Endoscopy guidelines;
- European Cooperative Oncology Group status 4;
- American Society of Anesthesiology score higher than 3;
- pregnant women;
- age under 18 years old;
- refusal or impossibility to sign informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
"Prof. Dr. Agrippa Ionescu" Clinical and Emerency Hospital
Bucharest, 0112013, Romania
Floreasca Emergency Hospital
Bucharest, 014471, Romania
Colentina Clinical Hospital
Bucharest, 020125, Romania
Related Publications (1)
Ciocirlan M, Gheorghiu A, Bilous D, Cruceru M, Manaila G, Tianu E, Vladut C. Monitored needle acceleration in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses improves sample quality and diagnostic accuracy: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2022 Apr;54(4):389-393. doi: 10.1055/a-1497-6532. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
PMID: 33940637DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mihai Ciocirlan, MS, PhD
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- At the end of the study, all slides will be scored for cellularity and quality on a 0 to 3 discrete scale, according to the previous work done by Mukai S et al \[12\], by an independent pathologist, from an institution not involved in the initial histological analysis, blinded to the type of pass ("fast" or "slow").
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, Senior Lecturer in Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2017
First Posted
October 6, 2017
Study Start
July 24, 2017
Primary Completion
January 30, 2020
Study Completion
January 30, 2020
Last Updated
January 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01