NCT03303352

Brief Summary

Summary Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS FNA) is an established and recommended technique for diagnostic of solid pancreatic masses. The accuracy of the technique depends on the operator experience, lesion type and location, type of procedure sedation as well as procedure related technique factors (presence of elastography or contrast enhanced imaging, needle diameter, presence of stylet, use of suction and type of suction, the number and method of "to and fro" movements, the number of passes and the presence of a cytopathologist in the examination room). The relationship between the "to and fro" movement and the EUS FNA yield in solid pancreatic masses has only been explored in the literature in a subjective fashion, without accurately measuring the needle acceleration. Recently, a simple electronic sensor device connected by Bluetooth to a phone, has been proposed for teaching and research purposes. Among its sensors, it includes an accelerometer which can measure the instant scalar acceleration of an object and transmit it to the connected phone. By attaching this device to the EUS FNA needle, the investigators can accurately measure the instant scalar acceleration of the "to and fro" movements. The investigators propose a prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study on 51 patients with solid pancreatic masses to compare an EUS FNA "fast" sampling technique in which the needle acceleration is higher than 1 g to a "slow" technique where the needle acceleration is lower than 1g. The primary objective of the study is to compare the tissue acquisition rates and the histological diagnosis accuracy between the 2 methods "fast" and "slow". The secondary objectives of the study are to compare the cellularity and quality scores of the obtained specimens between the 2 methods. Another secondary objective is to find a linear relationship between the needle acceleration and the EUS FNA yield (histological diagnosis, sample cellularity and adequacy).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 24, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 30, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 6, 2017

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 31, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

September 30, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Tissue acquisition rate of EUS FNA

    Fraction of tissue acquisition from all included patients,for "fast" and "slow" passages

    up to 12 months

  • Cytological diagnostic accuracy of EUS FNA, for "fast" and "slow" passages

    Fraction of correct diagnosis from all included patients

    up to 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Cellularity score of EUS FNA

    up to 12 months

  • Quality of cytological specimen of EUS FNA

    up to 12 months

  • The linear relationship between needle acceleration and outcomes 1,2,3 and 4

    up to 12 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Subgroup analysis for trans-gastric and trans-duodenal route

    up to 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Fast Pass First, Slow Pass Second

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient will receive 2 EUS FNA passes, 1 "fast" and 1 "slow", with a 22 gauge EUS needle, with suction syringe, employing the fanning technique, 10 jabs for each pass. A "fast" pass has an advancing mean acceleration jab ("to" movement) higher than 1 g, while a "slow" pass has an advancing mean acceleration jab of less than 1 g (where 1 g equals 9.8 m/s2). Both movements will have a "slow" "fro" withdrawal movement, from the point of maximum advance into the lesion to the lesion entry site. For each patient, the passes order with be either done as "fast" pass first, "slow" pass second.

Procedure: EUS FNA

Slow Pass First - Fast Pass Second

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient will receive 2 EUS FNA passes, 1 "fast" and 1 "slow", with a 22 gauge EUS needle, with suction syringe, employing the fanning technique, 10 jabs for each pass. A "fast" pass has an advancing mean acceleration jab ("to" movement) higher than 1 g, while a "slow" pass has an advancing mean acceleration jab of less than 1 g (where 1 g equals 9.8 m/s2). Both movements will have a "slow" "fro" withdrawal movement, from the point of maximum advance into the lesion to the lesion entry site. For each patient, the passes order with be either done as "slow" pass first, "fast" pass second.

Procedure: EUS FNA

Interventions

EUS FNAPROCEDURE

Patients with solid pancreatic masses fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to receive EUS FNA (endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration).

Fast Pass First, Slow Pass SecondSlow Pass First - Fast Pass Second

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • a solid pancreatic lesion with diameter larger than 20mm, with or without a cystic component, with unknown histology;
  • age above 18 years old;
  • signed informed consent;

You may not qualify if:

  • a solid pancreatic mass with a diameter less than 20mm or with known histology;
  • a cystic pancreatic mass, without a solid component;
  • coagulation disorder (international normalized ratio above 1.5, activated partial thromboplastin time above 42 seconds, platelet count less than 60000/mmc) or impossibility to stop antiaggregants or anticoagulants according to the European Society of Digestive Endoscopy guidelines;
  • European Cooperative Oncology Group status 4;
  • American Society of Anesthesiology score higher than 3;
  • pregnant women;
  • age under 18 years old;
  • refusal or impossibility to sign informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

"Prof. Dr. Agrippa Ionescu" Clinical and Emerency Hospital

Bucharest, 0112013, Romania

Location

Floreasca Emergency Hospital

Bucharest, 014471, Romania

Location

Colentina Clinical Hospital

Bucharest, 020125, Romania

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ciocirlan M, Gheorghiu A, Bilous D, Cruceru M, Manaila G, Tianu E, Vladut C. Monitored needle acceleration in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses improves sample quality and diagnostic accuracy: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2022 Apr;54(4):389-393. doi: 10.1055/a-1497-6532. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biopsy, Fine-NeedleBiopsy, NeedleBiopsyCytodiagnosisCytological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisImage-Guided BiopsySpecimen HandlingUltrasonography, InterventionalUltrasonographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Mihai Ciocirlan, MS, PhD

    "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
At the end of the study, all slides will be scored for cellularity and quality on a 0 to 3 discrete scale, according to the previous work done by Mukai S et al \[12\], by an independent pathologist, from an institution not involved in the initial histological analysis, blinded to the type of pass ("fast" or "slow").
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD, Senior Lecturer in Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2017

First Posted

October 6, 2017

Study Start

July 24, 2017

Primary Completion

January 30, 2020

Study Completion

January 30, 2020

Last Updated

January 31, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Locations