Comparison Between Olympus EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G in EUS-guided FNB of Solid Pancreatic Masses
Comparison Between the Olympus EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G in Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Masses
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is a valid and recommended technique for tissue diagnosis of pancreatic masses. However, the diagnostic yield is with a sensitivity of 64%-95% and an accuracy of 78%-94% still very low. The EUS-FNB of pancreatic masses is usually performed with a 22-gauge biopsy needle. The small diameter of the needle is usually responsible for the low yield of tissue samples for histopathological examination. The 19-gauge needles help to overcome the limitations of a 22-gauge needle by acquiring a larger amount of cellular material. Thus, performing EUS-FNB with a 19-gauge needle can maximize tissue acquisition and sample adequacy, which is important for appropriate diagnosis. Contrariwise, the technical success rate for sample retrieval in patients with pancreatic head lesions is significantly lower using the 19-gauge compared to the 22-gauge needle. This is attributable to the technical difficulty to push the needle out of the endoscope in the duodenum. Since about 60% of pancreatic cancers are located in the head region, it is therefore particularly important to improve technical success in these cases. The new 19-gauge biopsy needle "Olympus EZ Shot3 Plus" is more flexible than common biopsy needles such as "EZ Shot2" and should therefore provide improved access to regions like pancreatic head. The aim of this multicenter prospective randomized crossover study is to compare those two needles during EUS-FNB of solid pancreatic masses. Therefore this study will enroll 40 patients in five German centers with solid pancreatic masses and consecutive indication for EUS-FNB. Both needles will be used in each patient following a predetermined random order. Primary endpoint is the correct histological diagnosis of the mass assessed by each needle. Technical failure is regarded as a negative histological diagnosis. Secondary endpoints include a comparison of technical failure using each needle, histological quality, duration of procedure and rate of adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedFebruary 22, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.4 years
September 7, 2016
February 19, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Correct histological diagnosis of the mass assessed by each needle
Correct histological diagnosis of the mass assessed by each needle compared to gold standard. Gold standard is primarily positive histology, followed by diagnosis made due to additional methods to assess for malignancy (ultrasound, CT, ERCP, surgically retrieved specimen).
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
technical failure (inability to push the EUS-FNB needle out the endoscope to perform puncture)
Day one
histological quality of the specimen retrieved (visual analog scale)
24 months
histological quality of the specimen retrieved (over all satisfaction)
24 months
Duration of procedure
Day one
Adverse events
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
First pass EZ Shot 3Plus then EZ Shot 2
ACTIVE COMPARATOROlympus EZ Shot 3Plus will be used to puncture the mass first (Intervention EUS-FNB with EZ Shot 3Plus first), then the 19G and EZ Shot 2 will be used to puncture the pancreatic mass.
First pass EZ Shot 2 then EZ Shot 3Plus
ACTIVE COMPARATOROlympus EZ Shot 2 will be used to puncture the mass first (Intervention EUS-FNB with EZ Shot 2 19G first), then the EZ Shot 3Plus will be used to puncture the pancreatic mass.
Interventions
Both needles (EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G) will be used for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in each patient following a predetermined random order which needle is used to pass through the tumor first.
Both needles (EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G) will be used for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in each patient following a predetermined random order which needle is used to pass through the tumor first.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- solid pancreatic mass and consecutive indication for EUS-FNB
You may not qualify if:
- incapacity to give informed consent
- Haemorrhagic disease, disorder of hemostasis and coagulation (PT \<60%, PTT\> 42 sec. and platelets \<60000/µL)
- oral anticoagulants
- dual antiplatelet therapy with thienopyridines (e.g. clopidogrel)
- Pregnant or lactating
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Israelitisches Krankenhaus Hamburg
Hamburg, 22297, Germany
Niel Stensen Kliniken Marienhospital Osnabrück
Osnabrück, 49074, Germany
Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital
Stuttgart, 70174, Germany
University Ulm
Ulm, 89081, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Hann A, Epp S, Veits L, Rosien U, Siegel J, Moschler O, Bohle W, Meining A. Multicenter, randomized comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 19-gauge stainless steel and nitinol-based needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Apr;8(3):314-320. doi: 10.1177/2050640619887580. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
PMID: 32213013DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexander Meining
University Ulm
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr. Alexander Meining
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2016
First Posted
September 21, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share