Neurophysiologic Effects of Cervical Spinal Manipulation in Asymptomatic Individuals
1 other identifier
interventional
59
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study had the goal of analyse the neurophysiologic effects of both mechanical and manual cervical manipulation, in asymptomatic individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2018
CompletedMarch 14, 2018
March 1, 2018
1.2 years
September 8, 2017
March 12, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pressure pain thresholds
To measure the pressure pain threshold, it was used an electronic pressure dynamometer FORCE ONE™ FDIX (Wagner Instruments - Greenwich, USA), with 1cm2 of surface. The values were expressed in Kg/cm2. The pressure was increased at a rate of 1 kg/cm2/s until the subject inform that the sense of pressure has become a sense of pain.
Immediately after the intervention
Pressure pain perception
To evaluate the pressure pain perception, it was used a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The pressure increased until 2,5 kg/cm2 and was hold for 5 seconds, and the subject used the VAS scale to record the pressure pain perception he felt.
Immediately after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Muscle tone
Immediately after the intervention
Muscle stiffness
Immediately after the intervention
Muscle elasticity
Immediately after the intervention
Study Arms (4)
Manual manipulation
EXPERIMENTALIn the Manual manipulation group, the thrust was applied in the right side of C3/C4 with neutral flexion/extension, ipsilateral side bending and contralateral rotation. Then, a low amplitude, high velocity thrust in rotation was delivered.
Mechanical manipulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the Mechanical manipulation group, the Activator instrument was applied on the right transverse apophyses of C3.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe subjects were positioned in the same pre-manipulative position as the manual manipulation group, but the thrust didn't occur. Instead, the position was hold for 3 seconds and then the subject's head returned passively to neutral position.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe subjects stayed in supine position and no intervention occurred.
Interventions
In the Manual manipulation group, the thrust was applied in the right side of C3/C4 with neutral flexion/extension, ipsilateral side bending and contralateral rotation. Then, a low amplitude, high velocity thrust in rotation was delivered.
In the Mechanical manipulation group, the Activator instrument was applied on the right transverse apophyses of C3.
The subjects were positioned in the same pre-manipulative position as the manual manipulation group, but the thrust didn't occur. Instead, the position was hold for 3 seconds and then the subject's head returned passively to neutral position.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy subjects.
- Minimum of 18 years old.
You may not qualify if:
- Pain in cervical region, shoulders or arms.
- History of trauma or disease in the cervical region or upper limb.
- Use of medication that could affect the outcomes (painkillers, NSAID, or anti depressives) during the last week.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nuno Nogueira, MSc
Instituto Politécnico da Saúde do Norte
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Invited Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2017
First Posted
March 13, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share