European iNvestigation of SUrveillance After Resection for Esophageal Cancer
ENSURE
ENSURE: European iNvestigation of SUrveillance After Resection for Esophageal Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
3,000
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
The ENSURE study will comprise two phases. Phase 1: European multicenter survey of surveillance protocols after esophageal cancer surgery ENSURE questionnaire will be circulated to representatives from participating European countries. Phase 2: European multicenter retrospective observational study of the impact of postoperative surveillance protocols on oncologic outcome and HR-QL Phase 2 will constitute a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent for esophageal cancer at participating Centers from June 2009 to June 2015.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2009
Longer than P75 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 26, 2020
March 1, 2020
6 years
March 5, 2018
March 25, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Overall survival (months)
Overall survival in months will be compared by Kaplan-Meier methods and using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for known prognostic factors, to determine the independent impact of high intensity surveillance on survival outcome.
Minimum 3 year follow-up for all patients
Disease-specific survival (months)
Disease-specific survival in months will be compared by Kaplan-Meier methods and using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for known prognostic factors, to determine the independent impact of high intensity surveillance on survival outcome.
Minimum 3 year follow-up for all patients
Utilisation of routine surveillance imaging across European Centers
The proportion of European Centers utilising routine postperative oncologic surveillance imaging will be determined by email survey.
2009 - 2015
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Isolated solid organ metastasis (ISOM) at first recurrence
Minimum 3 year follow-up for all patients
Isolated local recurrence (ILR) at first recurrence
Minimum 3 year follow-up for all patients
Health-related quality of life (HR-QL) as assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire
At one year postoperatively
Study Arms (1)
Patients post curative intent surgery for esophageal cancer
Patients post potentially curative surgery for cTxNxM0 esophageal or esophagogastric junction (Siewert type I, II and III) cancer.
Interventions
High intensity surveillance protocol using routine cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography or positron emission tomography with computed tomography).
Eligibility Criteria
Phase 2 will constitute a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent for esophageal cancer at participating Centers from June 2009 to June 2015.
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years and above
- Underwent surgery with curative intent for cTxNxM0 esophageal or esophagogastric junction (Siewert type I, II and III) cancer
- Salvage surgery after failure of primary endoscopic or oncologic treatment will be included
You may not qualify if:
- Endoscopic therapy or definitive oncological treatment as sole therapy for esophageal cancer
- Missing follow-up data
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. James's Hospital, Irelandlead
- St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, Londoncollaborator
- Karolinska Institutetcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Department of Surgery, St. James's Hospital
Dublin, D4, Ireland
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Surgery and Cancer, 10th Floor, QEQM building, St. Mary's Hospital
London, W21NY, United Kingdom
Related Publications (7)
Antonowicz SS, Lorenzi B, Parker M, Tang CB, Harvey M, Kadirkamanathan SS. Annual computed tomography scans do not improve outcomes following esophagectomy for cancer: a 10-year UK experience. Dis Esophagus. 2015 May-Jun;28(4):365-70. doi: 10.1111/dote.12209. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
PMID: 24649807BACKGROUNDMessager M, de Steur W, Boelens PG, Jensen LS, Mariette C, Reynolds JV, Osorio J, Pera M, Johansson J, Kolodziejczyk P, Roviello F, De Manzoni G, Monig SP, Allum WH; EURECCA Upper GI group (European Registration of Cancer Care). Description and analysis of clinical pathways for oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma, in 10 European countries (the EURECCA upper gastro intestinal group - European Registration of Cancer Care). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1432-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
PMID: 26898839BACKGROUNDPeixoto RD, Lim HJ, Kim H, Abdullah A, Cheung WY. Patterns of surveillance following curative intent therapy for gastroesophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014 Sep;45(3):325-33. doi: 10.1007/s12029-014-9601-3.
PMID: 24756830BACKGROUNDDepypere L, Lerut T, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decker G, Van Veer H, De Leyn P, Nafteux P. Isolated local recurrence or solitary solid organ metastasis after esophagectomy for cancer is not the end of the road. Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/dote.12508.
PMID: 27704661BACKGROUNDSisic L, Strowitzki MJ, Blank S, Nienhueser H, Dorr S, Haag GM, Jager D, Ott K, Buchler MW, Ulrich A, Schmidt T. Postoperative follow-up programs improve survival in curatively resected gastric and junctional cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis. Gastric Cancer. 2018 May;21(3):552-568. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0751-4. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
PMID: 28741059BACKGROUNDAbate E, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Oezcelik A, Ayazi S, Costales J, Banki F, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR. Recurrence after esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma: defining optimal follow-up intervals and testing. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Apr;210(4):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.006.
PMID: 20347734BACKGROUNDElliott JA, Markar SR, Klevebro F, Johar A, Goense L, Lagergren P, Zaninotto G, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Nilsson M, Hanna GB, Reynolds JV; ENSURE Study Group. An International Multicenter Study Exploring Whether Surveillance After Esophageal Cancer Surgery Impacts Oncological and Quality of Life Outcomes (ENSURE). Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):e1035-e1044. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005378. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
PMID: 35129466DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John V Reynolds, MD FRCS
St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
George B Hanna, PhD FRCS
St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Magnus Nilsson, MD FRCS
Karolinska Institutet
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Surgical Research Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2018
First Posted
March 12, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03