NCT03461341

Brief Summary

The ENSURE study will comprise two phases. Phase 1: European multicenter survey of surveillance protocols after esophageal cancer surgery ENSURE questionnaire will be circulated to representatives from participating European countries. Phase 2: European multicenter retrospective observational study of the impact of postoperative surveillance protocols on oncologic outcome and HR-QL Phase 2 will constitute a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent for esophageal cancer at participating Centers from June 2009 to June 2015.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2009

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
3 countries

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2009

Completed
6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2015

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 5, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 12, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 26, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6 years

First QC Date

March 5, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 25, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Overall survival (months)

    Overall survival in months will be compared by Kaplan-Meier methods and using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for known prognostic factors, to determine the independent impact of high intensity surveillance on survival outcome.

    Minimum 3 year follow-up for all patients

  • Disease-specific survival (months)

    Disease-specific survival in months will be compared by Kaplan-Meier methods and using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for known prognostic factors, to determine the independent impact of high intensity surveillance on survival outcome.

    Minimum 3 year follow-up for all patients

  • Utilisation of routine surveillance imaging across European Centers

    The proportion of European Centers utilising routine postperative oncologic surveillance imaging will be determined by email survey.

    2009 - 2015

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Isolated solid organ metastasis (ISOM) at first recurrence

    Minimum 3 year follow-up for all patients

  • Isolated local recurrence (ILR) at first recurrence

    Minimum 3 year follow-up for all patients

  • Health-related quality of life (HR-QL) as assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire

    At one year postoperatively

Study Arms (1)

Patients post curative intent surgery for esophageal cancer

Patients post potentially curative surgery for cTxNxM0 esophageal or esophagogastric junction (Siewert type I, II and III) cancer.

Other: High intensity postoperative oncologic surveillance

Interventions

High intensity surveillance protocol using routine cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography or positron emission tomography with computed tomography).

Also known as: Screening for recurrence, Oncologic surveillance, Imaging follow-up
Patients post curative intent surgery for esophageal cancer

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Phase 2 will constitute a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent for esophageal cancer at participating Centers from June 2009 to June 2015.

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years and above
  • Underwent surgery with curative intent for cTxNxM0 esophageal or esophagogastric junction (Siewert type I, II and III) cancer
  • Salvage surgery after failure of primary endoscopic or oncologic treatment will be included

You may not qualify if:

  • Endoscopic therapy or definitive oncological treatment as sole therapy for esophageal cancer
  • Missing follow-up data

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Department of Surgery, St. James's Hospital

Dublin, D4, Ireland

Location

Karolinska Institutet

Stockholm, Sweden

Location

Department of Surgery and Cancer, 10th Floor, QEQM building, St. Mary's Hospital

London, W21NY, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Antonowicz SS, Lorenzi B, Parker M, Tang CB, Harvey M, Kadirkamanathan SS. Annual computed tomography scans do not improve outcomes following esophagectomy for cancer: a 10-year UK experience. Dis Esophagus. 2015 May-Jun;28(4):365-70. doi: 10.1111/dote.12209. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

    PMID: 24649807BACKGROUND
  • Messager M, de Steur W, Boelens PG, Jensen LS, Mariette C, Reynolds JV, Osorio J, Pera M, Johansson J, Kolodziejczyk P, Roviello F, De Manzoni G, Monig SP, Allum WH; EURECCA Upper GI group (European Registration of Cancer Care). Description and analysis of clinical pathways for oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma, in 10 European countries (the EURECCA upper gastro intestinal group - European Registration of Cancer Care). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1432-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

    PMID: 26898839BACKGROUND
  • Peixoto RD, Lim HJ, Kim H, Abdullah A, Cheung WY. Patterns of surveillance following curative intent therapy for gastroesophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2014 Sep;45(3):325-33. doi: 10.1007/s12029-014-9601-3.

    PMID: 24756830BACKGROUND
  • Depypere L, Lerut T, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decker G, Van Veer H, De Leyn P, Nafteux P. Isolated local recurrence or solitary solid organ metastasis after esophagectomy for cancer is not the end of the road. Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/dote.12508.

    PMID: 27704661BACKGROUND
  • Sisic L, Strowitzki MJ, Blank S, Nienhueser H, Dorr S, Haag GM, Jager D, Ott K, Buchler MW, Ulrich A, Schmidt T. Postoperative follow-up programs improve survival in curatively resected gastric and junctional cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis. Gastric Cancer. 2018 May;21(3):552-568. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0751-4. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

    PMID: 28741059BACKGROUND
  • Abate E, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Oezcelik A, Ayazi S, Costales J, Banki F, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR. Recurrence after esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma: defining optimal follow-up intervals and testing. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Apr;210(4):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.006.

    PMID: 20347734BACKGROUND
  • Elliott JA, Markar SR, Klevebro F, Johar A, Goense L, Lagergren P, Zaninotto G, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Nilsson M, Hanna GB, Reynolds JV; ENSURE Study Group. An International Multicenter Study Exploring Whether Surveillance After Esophageal Cancer Surgery Impacts Oncological and Quality of Life Outcomes (ENSURE). Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):e1035-e1044. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005378. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Esophageal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Metastasis

Interventions

Mass Screening

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsHead and Neck NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesNeoplastic ProcessesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisHealth SurveysSurveys and QuestionnairesData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesDiagnostic ServicesPreventive Health ServicesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public HealthPublic Health Practice

Study Officials

  • John V Reynolds, MD FRCS

    St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • George B Hanna, PhD FRCS

    St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Magnus Nilsson, MD FRCS

    Karolinska Institutet

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Surgical Research Fellow

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2018

First Posted

March 12, 2018

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion

June 1, 2015

Study Completion

April 1, 2019

Last Updated

March 26, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Locations