High Flow Nasal Cannula in the Emergency Department
HFNC
Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Acute Respiratory Failure in the Emergency Department
1 other identifier
observational
43
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to describe the changes in respiratory rate, heart rate and dyspnea, before and after using HFNC in patients presenting to our emergency department with ARF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2018
CompletedMarch 9, 2018
February 1, 2018
1.6 years
February 20, 2018
March 2, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Heart Rate
The closest value of Heart Rate before starting HFNC, and two hours later was collected from the electronic clinical history.
2 hours
Respiratory Rate
The closest value of Respiratory Rate before starting HFNC, and two hours later was collected from the electronic clinical history.
2 hours
Dyspnea
The closest value of Dyspnea (Modified Borg Dyspnea scale) before starting HFNC, and two hours later was collected from the electronic clinical history. The Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale is a rated numerical score used to measure dyspnea. This scale has a minimum value of 0 ( represent no dyspnea) and a maximum value of 10 (worse dyspnea).
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Initial HFNC setting
2 hours
Acute respiratory failure etiology
3 minutes
Average time of use the HFNC
until 28 days
Delay of HFNC treatment
until 24hs
Efficacy of HFNC treatment
28 days
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
The high flow device that we used was an air oxygen blender (Whisper FlowⓇ), which allows FiO2 adjustment between 0.30 and 1.0 and can deliver a gas flow from 10 to 150 l/min. The gas mixture was routed from a heated humidifier (MR850 with MR 290 chamber) through a one line heated inspiratory circuit (RT241) to the subject at a temperature of 37°C via a nasal cannula (OptiflowⓇ).
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with and without a history of lung disease who used high flow nasal cannula. We defined clinical signs of acute respiratory failure based on the presence of a breathing frequency ≥ 25 breath/min and increase work of breathing evidence by dyspnea, in-drawing, accessory-muscle use and/or diaphoresis, despite conventional oxygen therapy ≥ 6 l/min.
You may qualify if:
- patients aged ≥ 18 years
- attended between July 1st, 2015 and January 31st , 2017 in the Emergency Department of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
- with clinical signs of acute respiratory failure
You may not qualify if:
- \- Pulse oximetry \> 90% breathing room air
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (18)
Roca O, Hernandez G, Diaz-Lobato S, Carratala JM, Gutierrez RM, Masclans JR; Spanish Multidisciplinary Group of High Flow Supportive Therapy in Adults (HiSpaFlow). Current evidence for the effectiveness of heated and humidified high flow nasal cannula supportive therapy in adult patients with respiratory failure. Crit Care. 2016 Apr 28;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1263-z.
PMID: 27121707BACKGROUNDEl-Khatib MF. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy during hypoxemic respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2012 Oct;57(10):1696-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02072. No abstract available.
PMID: 23013907BACKGROUNDSztrymf B, Messika J, Mayot T, Lenglet H, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD. Impact of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on intensive care unit patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational study. J Crit Care. 2012 Jun;27(3):324.e9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.07.075. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
PMID: 21958974BACKGROUNDFerrer M, Esquinas A, Leon M, Gonzalez G, Alarcon A, Torres A. Noninvasive ventilation in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec 15;168(12):1438-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200301-072OC. Epub 2003 Sep 18.
PMID: 14500259BACKGROUNDKeenan SP, Sinuff T, Cook DJ, Hill NS. Does noninvasive positive pressure ventilation improve outcome in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure? A systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2516-23. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000148011.51681.e2.
PMID: 15599160BACKGROUNDRello J, Perez M, Roca O, Poulakou G, Souto J, Laborda C, Balcells J, Serra J, Masclans JR; CRIPS investigators. High-flow nasal therapy in adults with severe acute respiratory infection: a cohort study in patients with 2009 influenza A/H1N1v. J Crit Care. 2012 Oct;27(5):434-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
PMID: 22762937BACKGROUNDFrat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, Prat G, Boulain T, Morawiec E, Cottereau A, Devaquet J, Nseir S, Razazi K, Mira JP, Argaud L, Chakarian JC, Ricard JD, Wittebole X, Chevalier S, Herbland A, Fartoukh M, Constantin JM, Tonnelier JM, Pierrot M, Mathonnet A, Beduneau G, Deletage-Metreau C, Richard JC, Brochard L, Robert R; FLORALI Study Group; REVA Network. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2185-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503326. Epub 2015 May 17.
PMID: 25981908BACKGROUNDKernick J, Magarey J. What is the evidence for the use of high flow nasal cannula oxygen in adult patients admitted to critical care units? A systematic review. Aust Crit Care. 2010 May;23(2):53-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
PMID: 20206546BACKGROUNDMessika J, Ben Ahmed K, Gaudry S, Miguel-Montanes R, Rafat C, Sztrymf B, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD. Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Subjects With ARDS: A 1-Year Observational Study. Respir Care. 2015 Feb;60(2):162-9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03423. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
PMID: 25371400BACKGROUNDVargas F, Saint-Leger M, Boyer A, Bui NH, Hilbert G. Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Critical Care Subjects. Respir Care. 2015 Oct;60(10):1369-76. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03814. Epub 2015 May 5.
PMID: 25944940BACKGROUNDSchwabbauer N, Berg B, Blumenstock G, Haap M, Hetzel J, Riessen R. Nasal high-flow oxygen therapy in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure: effect on functional and subjective respiratory parameters compared to conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Aug 7;14:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-66. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25110463BACKGROUNDLemiale V, Mokart D, Mayaux J, Lambert J, Rabbat A, Demoule A, Azoulay E. The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial. Crit Care. 2015 Nov 2;19:380. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1097-0.
PMID: 26521922BACKGROUNDSztrymf B, Messika J, Bertrand F, Hurel D, Leon R, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD. Beneficial effects of humidified high flow nasal oxygen in critical care patients: a prospective pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Nov;37(11):1780-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2354-6. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
PMID: 21946925BACKGROUNDLenglet H, Sztrymf B, Leroy C, Brun P, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD. Humidified high flow nasal oxygen during respiratory failure in the emergency department: feasibility and efficacy. Respir Care. 2012 Nov;57(11):1873-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01575. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
PMID: 22417844BACKGROUNDRittayamai N, Tscheikuna J, Praphruetkit N, Kijpinyochai S. Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Acute Dyspnea and Hypoxemia in the Emergency Department. Respir Care. 2015 Oct;60(10):1377-82. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03837. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
PMID: 26060321BACKGROUNDJeong JH, Kim DH, Kim SC, Kang C, Lee SH, Kang TS, Lee SB, Jung SM, Kim DS. Changes in arterial blood gases after use of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.060. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
PMID: 26319192BACKGROUNDHughes J, Doolabh A. Heated, humidified, high-flow nasal oxygen usage in the adult Emergency Department. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2016 Nov;19(4):173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
PMID: 27283891BACKGROUNDJones PG, Kamona S, Doran O, Sawtell F, Wilsher M. Randomized Controlled Trial of Humidified High-Flow Nasal Oxygen for Acute Respiratory Distress in the Emergency Department: The HOT-ER Study. Respir Care. 2016 Mar;61(3):291-9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04252. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
PMID: 26577199BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vanesa R Ruiz, RT
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2018
First Posted
March 9, 2018
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 31, 2017
Study Completion
January 31, 2017
Last Updated
March 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02