NCT02236559

Brief Summary

The overall objective of this study is to determine if Vapotherm high flow nasal cannula therapy (HFT), when used to treat respiratory failure in the ED, is at least equivalent to the current standard of care for non-invasive ventilatory support, non-invasive positive pressure mask ventilation (NIPPV). Moreover, this study will investigate the potential that HFT has possible advantages over NIPPV, such as decreased time to patient stability from respiratory failure, and the ease of use as a first line intervention for respiratory failure in the ED environment. The hypothesis is that HFT via the Vapotherm Precision Flow will demonstrate clinical non-inferiority when compared to NIPPV with regard to treatment failure by way of an impact on ventilation indices and a lower intolerance rate, and have a positive association with hospital disposition and length of stay.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
204

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 10, 2014

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2017

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 23, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 23, 2019

Status Verified

April 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 8, 2014

Results QC Date

March 27, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

high flow therapyhigh flow nasal cannulaacute respiratory failurenoninvasive ventilation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Treatment Failure Rate

    Determine the efficacy of HFT compared to NIPPV in treating respiratory failure. The primary endpoint will be treatment failure within 72 hrs as determined by intubation.

    Within 72 hrs

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Ventilatory Indices 1

    At one and four hours baseline, 30min, 1 hr, 90 min, and 4 hrs (if still on therapy) and at treatment failure/intubation (if applicable).

  • Ventilatory Indices 2

    At baseline, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 4 hours, and treatment failure if applicable

  • Ventilatory Indices 3

    At one and four hours baseline, 30min, 1 hr, 90 min, and 4 hrs (if still on therapy) and at treatment failure/intubation (if applicable).

  • Ventilatory Indices 4

    At one and four hours baseline, 30min, 1 hr, 90 min, and 4 hrs (if still on therapy) and at treatment failure/intubation (if applicable).

  • Ventilatory Indices 5

    at baseline, 30min, 1 hr, 90 min, and 4 hrs (if still on therapy) and at treatment failure/intubation (if applicable)

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be fit with an oronasal mask using a fitting gauge that will be applied by a respiratory therapist or other clinician skilled in management of NIPPV. Initial pressures will be at low end of suggested range but can be increased as rapidly as necessary to alleviate respiratory distress. Targets should be to lower respiratory rate to the low 20s and achieve tidal volumes of 6-8 ml/kg ideal body weight. If patients find pressures uncomfortably high, they can be lowered as necessary by 1 to 2 cmH2O decrements to enhance tolerance. EPAP (PEEP) can also be adjusted upward as needed to reduce triggering effort (by counterbalancing auto-PEEP) or to improve oxygenation. FIO2 will be 1.0 initially to assure adequate oxygenation, but should be adjusted promptly to maintain an FIO2 of no greater than 0.6 with an EPAP (PEEP) of not more than 10 cm H2O to maintain a PaO2 \> 88%.

Device: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV)

High flow therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will be fit with a Vapotherm adult nasal cannula that will be applied by a respiratory therapist or other clinician skilled in management of HFT. Initial flow will be set to 35 L/min but can be decreased or increased as rapidly as necessary to alleviate respiratory distress and optimize patient comfort. Targets should be to lower respiratory rate to the low 20s and with a HFT flow rate between 20 to 35 L/min. Starting temperature will be between 35 to 37 C; if patients find the gas temperature to be uncomfortable, it can be lowered as necessary down to 33 C to enhance tolerance. FIO2 will be 1.0 initially to assure adequate oxygenation, but should be adjusted promptly to maintain an FIO2 of no greater than 0.6 to maintain a PaO2 \> 88%.

Device: Vapotherm

Interventions

Patients will be fit with an oronasal mask using a fitting gauge that will be applied by a respiratory therapist or other clinician skilled in management of NIPPV. Initial pressures will be at low end of suggested range but can be increased as rapidly as necessary to alleviate respiratory distress. Targets should be to lower respiratory rate to the low 20s and achieve tidal volumes of 6-8 ml/kg ideal body weight. If patients find pressures uncomfortably high, they can be lowered as necessary by 1 to 2 cmH2O decrements to enhance tolerance. EPAP (PEEP) can also be adjusted upward as needed to reduce triggering effort (by counterbalancing auto-PEEP) or to improve oxygenation. FIO2 will be 1.0 initially to assure adequate oxygenation, but should be adjusted promptly to maintain an FIO2 of no greater than 0.6 with an EPAP (PEEP) of not more than 10 cm H2O to maintain a PaO2 \> 88%.

Also known as: BIPAP
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
VapothermDEVICE

Patients will be fit with a Vapotherm adult nasal cannula that will be applied by a respiratory therapist or other clinician skilled in management of HFT. Initial flow will be set to 35 L/min but can be decreased or increased as rapidly as necessary to alleviate respiratory distress and optimize patient comfort. Targets should be to lower respiratory rate to the low 20s and with a HFT flow rate between 20 to 35 L/min. Starting temperature will be between 35 to 37 C; if patients find the gas temperature to be uncomfortable, it can be lowered as necessary down to 33 C to enhance tolerance. FIO2 will be 1.0 initially to assure adequate oxygenation, but should be adjusted promptly to maintain an FIO2 of no greater than 0.6 to maintain a PaO2 \> 88%.

Also known as: High flow nasal cannula
High flow therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (\> 18 yrs of age)
  • Presentation with acute respiratory failure according to the following criteria:
  • If any of these are present: Respiratory Rate \>22 or labored; Suspected Acute Respiratory Acidosis, as defined as pH \<7.32 on initial blood gas(either arterial or venous); Hypoxemia, as defined as Pulse Ox \<92%;
  • Clinical decision to escalate therapy to non-invasive ventilatory support, or to maintain non-invasive ventilatory support if delivered to the ED on such.

You may not qualify if:

  • Suspected drug overdose
  • Cardiovascular instability as demonstrated by hypotension relative to initial clinical presentation that requires immediate intervention
  • End stage cancer
  • Life expectancy \< 6 months
  • Respiratory arrest or significant respiratory depression on presentation
  • Glasgow Coma Scale score \< 9
  • Cardiac arrest on initial presentation
  • Need for emergent intubation
  • Known or suspected cerebrovascular accident
  • Known or suspected ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
  • Patients with increased risk of pulmonary aspiration
  • Agitation or uncooperativeness

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Athens Regional Medical Center

Athens, Georgia, 30606, United States

Location

McLeod Regional Medical Center

Florence, South Carolina, 29506, United States

Location

Erlanger Health System

Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403, United States

Location

Memorial Hermann Hospital

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Memorial Hermann The Woodlands

The Woodlands, Texas, 77380, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Doshi P, Whittle JS, Bublewicz M, Kearney J, Ashe T, Graham R, Salazar S, Ellis TW Jr, Maynard D, Dennis R, Tillotson A, Hill M, Granado M, Gordon N, Dunlap C, Spivey S, Miller TL. High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation in the Treatment of Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;72(1):73-83.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Jan 6.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Pratik Doshi, MD
Organization
McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Study Officials

  • Pratik B Doshi, MD

    University of Texas

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Thomas L Miller, PhD

    Vapotherm, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2014

First Posted

September 10, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2016

Study Completion

February 1, 2017

Last Updated

May 23, 2019

Results First Posted

May 23, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-04

Locations