Comparing Low-cost Handheld Autorefractors - a Practical Approach to Measuring Refraction in Low Resource Settings
A Validation Study of Mobile Technologies for Assessing Visual Acuity and Eye Health Among Older Adults in India
1 other identifier
observational
205
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Study compares four portable vision measurement and eye-imaging technologies in terms of accuracy and time and ease of use with older adult (ages 40-100) participants in a developing-country setting (India). Specifically, the five portable devices will be measured against the baseline of the traditional eye-examination techniques, including the use of eye charts and phoropters.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 24, 2020
CompletedFebruary 24, 2020
February 1, 2020
17 days
July 20, 2017
October 15, 2019
February 11, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of Assessment of Participants' Best Visual Acuity (in Diopters)
Measurements of participants' best visual acuity as measured by mobile devices compared to "gold standard" of subjective refraction
1-2 hours
Study Arms (1)
Vision device validation
In the single arm of this study, all members of this group were examined using a number of mobile eyesight assessment devices.
Interventions
Group members had their vision tested with the following devices/methods: Eyenetra NETRA, PlenOptika Quicksee, Right Manufacturing Retinomax K Plus 3, and standard eyesight tests using eye charts, phoropters, and slit lens lamp imaging.
Eligibility Criteria
Individuals aged 40-100 coming to Sankara Eye Hospital for standard eyesight evaluation from surrounding urban/rural communities
You may qualify if:
- \- Individuals aged 40-100 coming to Sankara Eye Hospital from surrounding urban/rural communities.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals under the age of 40.
- Blind individuals
- Individuals with acute glaucoma, eye trauma/injury, infections such as conjunctivitis
- Individuals physically/cognitively incapable of following basic instructions and sitting/standing still in order to use devices.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)lead
- Sankara Eye Hospitalcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David Bloom
- Organization
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David E Bloom, PhD
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2017
First Posted
March 7, 2018
Study Start
August 15, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 24, 2020
Results First Posted
February 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share