Does tDCS Improve Motor Learning in Children With DCD?
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): A Therapeutic Intervention for Motor Impairments in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD).
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Transcrainial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has become increasingly popular over the past decade. tDCS is a safe and well-studied form of non-invasive brain stimulation. The purpose of the current study is to see if tDCS can improve motor function in children with developmental coordination disorder. Non-invasive brain stimulation is shown to positively affect motor performance in children with neurodevelopmental and/or neurological conditions. For example, tDCS improves hand motor function in children with paediatric stroke and cerebral palsy. The benefits of tDCS in developmental coordination disorder is unknown. The current study will assess children's motor performance before and after tDCS intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2019
CompletedMarch 25, 2020
April 1, 2019
1.5 years
February 27, 2018
March 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Purdue Pegborad Test (PPT)
The PPT is a valid measure of fine motor coordination, hand dexterity, and motor learning skills, which consists of 4 subtests: left hand peg placement \[PPTL\], right hand peg placement \[PPTR\], bimanual peg placement \[PPTLR\], and bimanual assembly \[PPTA\]. The PPT peg placement subtests involve placing as many pins as possible into a pegboard during a 30 second interval. The total number of pegs, or pairs of pegs, placed are counted and scored. The PPT assembly subtest involved building as many copies of a demonstration structure using pins, pegs, and washers within a 60 second time period.
20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Jebsen-Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTT)
20 minutes
Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT)
20 minutes
Other Outcomes (1)
KINARM
45 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Anodal tDCS Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALTranscrainial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): The right primary motor cortex will be localized and a saline soaked sponge electrode will be placed onto M1 with a second saline soaked sponge electrode placed on the contralateral supraorbital region.
Sham tDCS Intervention Group
SHAM COMPARATORTranscrainial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): The right primary motor cortex will be localized and a saline soaked sponge electrode will be placed onto M1 with a second saline soaked sponge electrode placed on the contralateral supraorbital region.
Interventions
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe non-invasive form of brain stimulation, which modulates, through the application of weak direct current, cortical excitability. The applied subthreshold current passes through two externally placed electrodes, an anode and cathode.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed and documented DCD (including individuals with additional diagnoses of attention and/or learning disorders)
- Aged 10 to 15 years
- Right Handed
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of implanted electrical devices, metallic implants, and/or irremovable metal objects (i.e., cardiac pacemakers, braces etc.)
- Pregnancy or possibility of pregnancy
- Diagnosed with a neuropsychiatric disorder such as autism spectrum disorder or chronic medical condition such as cerebral palsy or epilepsy
- Taking prescribed medications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Child Development Center, Owerko Centre Alberta Children's Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada
Related Publications (10)
Smits-Engelsman BC, Blank R, van der Kaay AC, Mosterd-van der Meijs R, Vlugt-van den Brand E, Polatajko HJ, Wilson PH. Efficacy of interventions to improve motor performance in children with developmental coordination disorder: a combined systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Mar;55(3):229-37. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12008. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
PMID: 23106530BACKGROUNDReis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, Buch ER, Fritsch B, Zarahn E, Celnik PA, Krakauer JW. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 3;106(5):1590-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805413106. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
PMID: 19164589BACKGROUNDGoodwill AM, Reynolds J, Daly RM, Kidgell DJ. Formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tDCS and motor training. Front Aging Neurosci. 2013 Dec 6;5:87. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00087. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24367333BACKGROUNDCiechanski P, Kirton A. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children. Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 1;27(5):2758-2767. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw114.
PMID: 27166171BACKGROUNDKirton A, Ciechanski P, Zewdie E, Andersen J, Nettel-Aguirre A, Carlson H, Carsolio L, Herrero M, Quigley J, Mineyko A, Hodge J, Hill M. Transcranial direct current stimulation for children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis. Neurology. 2017 Jan 17;88(3):259-267. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003518. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
PMID: 27927938BACKGROUNDKirton A, Andersen J, Herrero M, Nettel-Aguirre A, Carsolio L, Damji O, Keess J, Mineyko A, Hodge J, Hill MD. Brain stimulation and constraint for perinatal stroke hemiparesis: The PLASTIC CHAMPS Trial. Neurology. 2016 May 3;86(18):1659-67. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002646. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
PMID: 27029628BACKGROUNDMoura RCF, Santos C, Collange Grecco L, Albertini G, Cimolin V, Galli M, Oliveira C. Effects of a single session of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper limb movements in children with cerebral palsy: A randomized, sham-controlled study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017 Aug;20(6):368-375. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2017.1282050. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
PMID: 28632467BACKGROUNDBikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou AL, Jiang J, Adnan T, Mourdoukoutas AP, Kronberg G, Truong D, Boggio P, Brunoni AR, Charvet L, Fregni F, Fritsch B, Gillick B, Hamilton RH, Hampstead BM, Jankord R, Kirton A, Knotkova H, Liebetanz D, Liu A, Loo C, Nitsche MA, Reis J, Richardson JD, Rotenberg A, Turkeltaub PE, Woods AJ. Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):641-661. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
PMID: 27372845BACKGROUNDAmbrus GG, Al-Moyed H, Chaieb L, Sarp L, Antal A, Paulus W. The fade-in--short stimulation--fade out approach to sham tDCS--reliable at 1 mA for naive and experienced subjects, but not investigators. Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
PMID: 22405745BACKGROUNDGrohs MN, Craig BT, Kirton A, Dewey D. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Function in Children 8-12 Years With Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 11;14:608131. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.608131. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33362497DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Deborah M Dewey, PhD
University of Calgary
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will not be informed of the stimulation group to which they are randomized. Both stimulation groups produce similar transient scalp sensations in participants and the sham protocol that will be used has been shown to be valid and ensures that participants are naïve to their assigned treatment group \[9\]. Participants will be asked which stimulation group they felt they took part in to ensure adequate blinding. Outcomes assessors will be blinded. Offline video analysis will be used to score motor assessment performance. These videos will exclude all identifying information including the participant's face and their stimulation group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2018
First Posted
March 5, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2018
Primary Completion
November 30, 2019
Study Completion
November 30, 2019
Last Updated
March 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Currently, there is no pre-determined plan to share any collected data with other researchers.