Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Procedural Pain During IV Insertion in Children in the Emergency Department
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Venipuncture and intravenous (IV) access continue to be the most common causes of pain and distress among children in the pediatric emergency department. Virtual reality has been successful for reducing pain and fear in many clinical scenarios, including port access in oncology patients, anxiety disorders, phobias, burn and wound care and others. There is only one previous study examining virtual reality distraction to reduce procedural pain during IV insertion in pediatric patients and no previous studies examining this in the emergency department setting. In this study, the investigators will compare immersive virtual reality (an interactive underwater environment) to the current standard (tablet device/iPad playing a movie) for distraction to reduce procedural pain during IV insertion. The investigators hypothesize that the immersive quality of the virtual reality will reduce patient's pain scores, fear scores and tachycardia during and after the procedure, and have minimal effect on departmental flow and nursing satisfaction. If this feasibility pilot study yields positive results, the investigators plan to expand to a larger randomized control trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2019
CompletedOctober 9, 2019
October 1, 2019
1.7 years
January 19, 2018
October 7, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Change in Pain Intensity
Using an 11 point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0 being no distress at all and 10 being the most distress you can imagine this child or you having) children will self-report their pain and parents, nurses and the researcher will report children's pain BOTH prior to and following the procedure.
Baseline, 30 minutes after baseline
Change in Child Distress
Using an 11 point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0 being no distress at all and 10 being the most distress you can imagine this child or you having) children will self-report their distress and parents, nurses and the researcher will report children's distress BOTH prior to and following the procedure
Baseline, 30 minutes after baseline
Change in Child Fear
Children will report fear BOTH prior to and following the procedure using the Child Fear Scale (CFS) which is a 5-face visual scale that measures fear intensity and is validated in children as young as 5 years. It consists of a 1-question scale rating fear from 0 - 4, based on the faces provided. A higher number represents higher fear intensity.
Baseline, 30 minutes after baseline
Child Pain Catastrophizing
Children will report baseline tendencies to catastrophize about pain using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Child (PCS-C). This is a self-report measure of children's tendency to catastrophize about pain validated in children 8-18 years of age. 6-items responded to on an 11-point scale from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("a lot"), with a higher number representing higher pain catastrophizing.
Baseline
Parent Pain Catastrophizing
Parents will report baseline tendencies to catastrophize about their child's pain using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Parent (PCS-P), which is a self-report measure of parents' tendency to catastrophize about their child's pain validated in parents of children 8-18 years of age. 6-items responded to on an 11-point scale from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("a lot"), with a higher number representing higher parental pain catastrophizing of their child's pain.
Baseline
Parent Distress
Parents will report on their own level of distress following the child's procedure using the Parent Distress Questionnaire. This measure consists of 4-items responded to on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("extremely"). A higher number value represents higher distress levels.
30 minutes after baseline measures are completed
Child Presence Measure
This child self-report measure assesses effectiveness of the immersive aspect of the VR toolkit/iPad using 12 questions, a choice of three answers ("no", "a little", and "a lot").
30 minutes after baseline measures are completed
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Recruitment log
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Acceptability
30 minutes after baseline measures are completed
Outcome measure feasibility
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Technical Difficulties Log
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group (VR)
EXPERIMENTALThe patient will be allowed to 'try-out' the VR system (including all auditory and visual features) for \~5 minutes prior to the start of the procedure. In addition to usual care, consisting of child-life presence and topical analgesics if ordered by the treating medical team, children in the experimental condition will wear the VR HMD plus headphones and hold the VR controller.
Control Group (Standard Care - Video)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient will be allowed to watch an age-appropriate video on a tablet device. The patient will be offered to wear the same headphones as in the experimental condition. The patient will have the tablet and headphones for \~5 minutes prior to the start of the procedure. In addition, the patient will receive standard care consisting of a child life specialist and topical analgesics (if ordered by the treating medical team).
Interventions
VR with head mounted display (HMD) and headphones.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 8-17 years
- able to speak and understand English
- parent/guardian present
- medically stable (CTAS 2, 3, 4 or 5; IV insertion +/-20 minutes will not impact the safety of the patient according to treating medical team)
- requires IV insertion
You may not qualify if:
- visual, auditory or cognitive impairments precluding interaction with the VR intervention or reporting pain and fear
- psychiatric conditions that could be exacerbated by the VR environment (i.e. hallucinations)
- skin, face or ear infections or injuries, which could contaminate the intervention equipment
- medically unstable (CTAS 1; patient requires immediate IV insertion)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2018
First Posted
February 19, 2018
Study Start
February 1, 2018
Primary Completion
September 30, 2019
Study Completion
September 30, 2019
Last Updated
October 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10