Satisfaction and Quality of Life Comparison Between Patients Using Cicaplast Baume B5 Versus Dexeryl for the Management of Cutaneous Toxicities Induced by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors (iEGFR)
CICAFIX
Comparative Monocentric Randomized Study Evaluating the Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Patients Using Cicaplast Baume B5 Versus Dexeryl for the Management of Cutaneous Toxicities Induced by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors (iEGRF) in Carcinomas Squamous Cells of the Head and Neck, Colorectal Cancers or Lung Cancers
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized comparative study aims to evaluate the satisfaction and quality of life of patients using Cicaplast balm B5, versus Dexeryl, for the management of cutaneous toxicities of iEGFR in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, cancers colorectal or pulmonary
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 11, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 11, 2021
CompletedJuly 9, 2021
July 1, 2021
3.2 years
January 29, 2018
July 8, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall patient satisfaction after 30 days treatment
Overall patient satisfaction toward Cicaplast balm B5 or Dexeryl will be evaluated by a numerical scale from 0 to 10 in each arm
After 30 days of treatment or at the end of treatment for patient who interrupt the treatment before 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Overall patient satisfaction after 60 days treatment
After 60 days of treatment or at the end of treatment for patient who interrupt the treatment before 60 days
Patient Quality of life
At inclusion, after 30 and 60 days of treatment
Cutaneous toxicities evaluation using Epidermal Repair Score (SCOREPI)
After 15, 30 and 60 days of treatment
Cutaneous toxicities evaluation using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4
After 15, 30 and 60 days of treatment
Modification/Interruption/Discontinuing iEGFR treatment rate
Continuously up to 30 days after starting treatment
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm A : Cicaplast balm B5
EXPERIMENTALUse of Cicaplast balm B5, 2 to 3 applications per day, since the first day of iEGFR treatment initiation for 30 days to avoid or limit appearance of cutaneous toxicities related to iEGFR treatment.
Arm B : Dexeryl
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse of Dexeryl, 2 to 3 applications per day, since de first day of iEGFR treatment initiation for 30 days to avoid or limit appearence of cutaneous toxicities related to iEGFR treatment.
Interventions
The patients have to do 2 to 3 applications per day on the face, on lesions and in poultice in the evening in case of painful crack on the fingers
The patients have to do 2 to 3 applications per day on the face, on lesions and in poultice in the evening in case of painful crack on the fingers
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Patient with recurrent and / or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma OR metastatic colorectal cancer with non-mutated RAS gene (wild-type) OR non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR activating mutations.
- Treated for the first time by an iEGFR having received a marketing authorization.
- Having signed a consent to participate in the study.
- Affiliated to a health insurance plan (or beneficiary of such a plan).
You may not qualify if:
- Concomitant radiotherapy.
- Unresolved skin toxicity from previous treatment, whatever it may be.
- Concomitant use of other topical treatments.
- Known hypersensitivity to at least one of the components of the topicals used.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Participation in another clinical trial (even if supportive care)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, Rhône, 69008, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jérôme FAYETTE, Doctor
Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2018
First Posted
February 5, 2018
Study Start
February 16, 2018
Primary Completion
April 11, 2021
Study Completion
May 11, 2021
Last Updated
July 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07