NCT03409302

Brief Summary

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) delivered face-to-face is an empirically supported intervention for the management of chronic pain (CP). However, increasing demands for cost reduction in healthcare services in addition to obstacles regarding physical access to treatment, highlight the need for innovative, cost-reducing, digital self-management interventions. Poor user engagement nonetheless, is a significant challenge often faced in digital interventions, which often results in poor adherence or even non-completion in treatment. In addition, very few digital trials appear to plan for adherence a-priori, when designing an intervention. To date there are only two ACT-based digital interventions for CP demonstrating significant improvements in pain-related disability and increased functioning, yet with small to medium effect sizes and poor adherence rates. However, several limitations of the studies such as the absence of a-priori adherence planning and lack of investigation of underlying mechanisms, makes it difficult to draw clear conclusions on the effectiveness of this new treatment modality for chronic pain and warrants further research. This study seeks to: a) explore how a brief adherence-planned digital ACT-based intervention for CP management, compared to an active control group and a wait-list control group improves targeted study outcomes such as functioning and quality of life, and b) investigate which processes of change mediate the targeted study outcomes. It is hypothesized that the brief ACT-based digital intervention in comparison to the active control group and wait-list will result in increased functioning, improved quality of life and reduced pain intensity. The results of the study are expected to shed more light on the utility of planning for adherence in digital interventions and effectiveness of ACT-based digital interventions and their underlying mechanisms in the management of CP.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 6, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2018

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 24, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 24, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

April 6, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

ACTdigital interventionweb-basedadherence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in daily functioning assessed with the Greek Brief Pain Inventory: Interference sub-scale (G-BPI; Mystakidou, Mendoza, Tsilika, Befon, Parpa et al., 2001; Original: Cleeland & Ryan; 1994)

    This is a subscale of the Greek-Brief Pain Inventory which is a pain assessment tool developed to assess pain severity and interference which has been previously translated and validated in a Greek chronic pain sample. Pain severity is of secondary focus within the study and will be assessed by a numerical rating scale as described later. The interference subscale will only be used to assess how pain interferes in several areas of daily functioning of chronic pain sufferers. It contains 7-items rated on a Likert-type scale from 0="does not interfere" to 10="completely interferes". The G-BPI presents with good internal consistency (α=.85 for interference) and sufficient validity with theoretically-consistent instruments.

    Change in levels of daily functioning from baseline through study completion (approximately 2 months) and at 6 and 12 months post completion. Data will be reported for study completion (approximately 2 months), 6 months and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in the quality of life assessed by the World Health Organisation Quality of Life-BREF Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF; The WHOQOL Group, 1998)

    Change in levels of quality of life from baseline through study completion (approximately 2 months) and at 6 and 12 months post completion. Data will be reported for study completion (approximately 2 months), 6 months and 12 months

  • Changes in the levels of psychological distress assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)

    Change in levels of depression and anxiety symptoms from baseline through study completion (approximately 2 months) and at 6 and 12 months post completion. Data will be reported for study completion (approximately 2 months), 6 months and 12 months

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Changes in avoidance of pain levels as assessed by the Greek Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (G-PIPS-II; Vasiliou et al., under submission; Original: Wicksell et al., 2010)

    Change in levels of psychological flexibility from baseline through study completion (approximately 2 months) and at 6 and 12 months post completion. Data will be reported for study completion (approximately 2 months), 6 months and 12 months

  • Changes in the levels of pain acceptance as assessed via the Greek Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (G-CPAQ; Vasiliou et al., under review; Original: McCracken et al., 2004)

    Change in levels of pain acceptance from baseline through study completion (approximately 2 months) and at 6 and 12 months post completion. Data will be reported for study completion (approximately 2 months), 6 months and 12 months

  • Changes in the levels of defusion with pain-related thoughts as assessed via Cognitive Defusion Stamp (Karekla & Nicolaou, 2011)

    Change in levels of defusion at 4 points from baseline through completion (approximately once every week, prior to each session). Data will be reported once when study is completed (approximately 2 months after baseline)

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

The ALGEapp (Brief i-ACT intervention)

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention builds on a previously unpublished face-to-face protocol for greek-speaking chronic pain sufferers (developed by Karekla \& Vasiliou, 2013) and has been simplified and modified to produce a self-help digital internet-based modality, namely the ALGEApp. ALGEApp consists of a total of 4 approximately one-hour sessions, which are structured to be completed by the users in sequence within a time frame of 2-8 weeks (depending on the rate of completion by each user). The intervention is guided, which implies that an animated character (an Avatar) guides the user throughout the whole duration of the intervention. ALGEApp contains experiential and audiovisual psycho-educational material based on ACT, adopted for the Greek-Cypriot culture.

Behavioral: ALGEApp (Brief iACT intervention)

Active Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Active control group will have access only to limited component of the ALGEApp intervention, namely the Bonus section, which contains limited psycho-educational information regarding pain management.

Behavioral: Active control group

Interventions

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups: brief i-ACT intervention or active control group. The i-ACT intervention participants will be encouraged to login the website platform with their credentials and to complete 4 weekly sessions (1 session per week) which lasts about 1 hour each. Participants will be guided by a 3D- animated Avatar who adopts the role of a facilitator.

Also known as: ALGEApp
The ALGEapp (Brief i-ACT intervention)

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups: brief i-ACT intervention or active control group. The active control group will have access, through the same platform. only to limited online psycho-educational information regarding pain. Active control group will complete pre-treatment and post-treatment questionnaires in parallel with the intervention group.

Active Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • At least 3 months chronic pain duration,
  • At least a pain intensity score of ≥ 4 prior to the intervention (assessed by an 11 point numeric rating scale (NRS; Dworkin et al., 2005) ranging from (0) 'no pain' to (10) 'pain as bad as the participant can imagine'.
  • Users to have undergone medical assessment within one year,
  • Official medical diagnosis on the type of chronic pain that users suffer from,
  • Regular access to a computer/tablet and internet
  • Sufficient knowledge of the Greek language.

You may not qualify if:

  • Comorbidity with a serious medical condition other than chronic non-malignant pain (e.g., complete paraplegia or tetraplegia, heart or vascular diseases, malignant pain such as cancer etc.), which may interfere with participation. A neurologist will be consulted and candidates will be excluded if their medical condition is regarded as significantly interfering with their participation.
  • Recent episodes of active psychosis, manic episodes, substance use disorder and suicidal ideation. Assessment will take place using selected single items from mini-SCID (mini - Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Karekla \& Panayiotou 2010). Candidates who respond positively to one or more of the assessed mini-SCID items will be excluded from further participation and will receive information over the phone with advice to seek help, along with relevant information on available services from their local community mental health services or their general practitioner.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Maria Karekla, Ph.D

    University of Cyprus

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Maria Karekla, Ph.D

CONTACT

Orestis Kasinopoulos, M.Sc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Double blind (subject, outcome assessor)
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Licensed Clinical Psychologist, Assistant Professor, Peer reviewed ACT trainer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2017

First Posted

January 24, 2018

Study Start

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion

March 1, 2018

Study Completion

April 1, 2018

Last Updated

January 24, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share