NCT04978961

Brief Summary

This mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial sought to: 1) evaluate implementation of a brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy treatment for chronic pain delivered by an integrated behavioral health consultant in primary care; and to 2) explore treatment outcomes and their associated mechanisms of change.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 9, 2017

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 10, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 22, 2019

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2021

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 27, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

July 15, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 24, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

chronic painacceptance and commitment therapyintegrated primary carebehavioral health consultant

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Self-reported physical disability

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item self-report scale that assesses perceived disability and functional impairment across a range of daily activities, with higher scores indicating greater perceived disability. Although originally developed as a measure of back pain, we used an established modified version that asked about "pain" rather than "back pain." The ODI uses a 6-point Likert scale for each item, which is summed to create a total score (maximum 50) that is then divided by highest possible score based on items skipped, and doubled to provide a percentage of patient perceived disability. The ODI and has been validated across a wide range of populations as a reliable and useful indicator of overall disability. Scores range from 0-100.

    Booster (12 weeks from baseline)

  • Self-reported physical disability

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item self-report scale that assesses perceived disability and functional impairment across a range of daily activities, with higher scores indicating greater perceived disability. Although originally developed as a measure of back pain, we used an established modified version that asked about "pain" rather than "back pain." The ODI uses a 6-point Likert scale for each item, which is summed to create a total score (maximum 50) that is then divided by highest possible score based on items skipped, and doubled to provide a percentage of patient perceived disability. The ODI and has been validated across a wide range of populations as a reliable and useful indicator of overall disability. Scores range from 0 - 100.

    6-month follow-up

  • Feasibility of intervention and study (attrition and satisfaction ratings)

    Feasibility was evaluated using a priori established benchmarks: (a) \< 25% participant attrition; (b) at least 80% of participants rating the FACT program as satisfactory as measured by response of at least 5 on a 7-point Likert-scale (1= Not Satisfied at All, 7 = Very Satisfied). The satisfaction question was asked in the context of an "exit interview": all participants who completed the 6-month follow-up assessment were contacted by the PI to provide feedback on their experiences in the study.

    6-month follow-up

  • Acceptability of the FACT intervention

    Acceptability of the FACT intervention from the participants' perspective was measured via 3 Likert-scale questions gathered during the semi-structured interview focused on: perceived benefit, ease of learning about pain management, and whether the participant would recommend the FACT treatment to a friend or family member

    6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Chronic Pain Acceptance

    Booster (12 weeks from baseline)

  • Chronic Pain Acceptance

    6-month follow-up

  • Engagement in Valued Activities

    Booster (12 weeks from baseline)

  • Engagement in Valued Activities

    6-month follow-up

Study Arms (2)

Focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (FACT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Focused Acceptance \& Commitment Therapy (FACT): FACT is a brief type of cognitive behavioral therapy that helps patients reduce disability through increased acceptance, reconnection with values, and reduced unhelpful control/coping strategies. Patients randomized to the intervention group received FACT per the study manual, delivered by an integrated Behavioral Health Consultant (BHC). Patients had one individual visit (30 minutes) and three consecutive weekly group visits (one hour) followed by a booster visit two months later. These classes (group visits) were rolling, not cohort-driven, meaning new and returning patients will be attending together. After the individual BHC visit and each class, patients had behavioral "homework" to complete.

Behavioral: Focused Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (FACT)

Enhanced Treatment as Usual (ETAU)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized to the Enhanced-Treatment As Usual (ETAU) group received "enhancement" of usual primary care via 1-page (2-sided) educational handouts on four topic areas: Sleep, Pacing, Relaxation and Goal Setting. All topics have an evidence base in standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy treatment of pain. One handout per assessment visit was given to each patient. Patients will continue to see their primary care clinicians and have access to all routine clinical services throughout the study.

Behavioral: Enhanced Treatment as Usual (ETAU)

Interventions

FACT is a brief form of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and in this study, FACT focused on increasing patient functioning through connection with valued activities and increased acceptance.

Focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (FACT)

This active control intervention included 4 handouts focused on pain management based on cognitive behavioral science.

Enhanced Treatment as Usual (ETAU)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age 18 and older
  • at least one non-cancer pain condition persisting for 12 weeks or more
  • a current primary care clinician at the study clinic
  • ongoing treatment for a non-cancer chronic pain condition

You may not qualify if:

  • social anxiety or unwillingness to participate in a class setting
  • presence of symptoms of psychosis and/or delirium
  • a medical condition or life circumstance that would contraindicate or prevent participating (e.g. upcoming surgery)
  • inability to comprehend the informed consent process or study instructions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Medical Drive Primary Care

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Kanzler KE, Robinson PJ, McGeary DD, Mintz J, Kilpela LS, Finley EP, McGeary C, Lopez EJ, Velligan D, Munante M, Tsevat J, Houston B, Mathias CW, Potter JS, Pugh J. Addressing chronic pain with Focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in integrated primary care: findings from a mixed methods pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Prim Care. 2022 Apr 14;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01690-2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Kathryn Kanzler

    University of Texas Health San Antonio

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
PI was masked to assessment outcomes during intervention phase
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2021

First Posted

July 27, 2021

Study Start

October 9, 2017

Primary Completion

December 10, 2018

Study Completion

April 22, 2019

Last Updated

July 27, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, \[author initials\], upon reasonable request

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR

Locations