Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain
ALGEA
An Innovative Psychosocial Intervention for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Patients and Their Families
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic pain is a long-term condition which is related to a number of negative consequences including reduced productivity at work, increased number of sick leave , depression and emotional difficulties among others. Psychological interventions, particular Cognitive Behavioral therapies (CBT) are deemed effective in reducing the negative consequences following a diagnosis of a chronic pain condition. Though research provides substantial evidence for the CBT effectiveness, not all patients manage to reduce pain intensity or improve their physical and psychosocial functioning. Also, CBT appears with only small effect sizes on variables considered to be core domains in chronic pain. Finally, there are criticism targets on the lack of clear mechanisms underlying the process of change in CBT. New CBT therapeutic approaches, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) focus on changing individuals' relation with their inner experiences. They utilize mindfulness and acceptance processes, instead of directly changing or controlling the content of internal experiences, as CBT does. ACT has received support for its effectiveness in chronic pain but there are very few clinical randomized trials to compare it with traditional CBT. The purpose of this study is to determine whether an ACT-based intervention when compared with a CBT-based intervention designed for chronic pain patients is efficacious in reducing pain interference, pain-related disability, and psychological distress. Also this study aims to examine whether any therapeutic effects result due to the effect of acceptance, for those participating in the ACT group or control appraisal, for those participating in the CBT group. Better knowledge of the mechanism of therapeutic change can help us to recognize which patients can be benefit from which approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Sep 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable chronic-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedMay 23, 2016
May 1, 2016
2.8 years
May 12, 2016
May 20, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in pain intensity as assessed with the Greek Brief Pain Inventory (G-BPI)
is an 11-item measure of intensity and interference of pain in 7 life dimensions: work, mood, activity, sleep, relationships, walking and enjoyment, rated on a scale with 0="no pain" and 10="pain as bad as you can imagine". The G-BPI has shown good reliability, Cronbach's alpha=.80 and sufficient validity with constructs considered theoretically related.
Change from baseline pain intensity through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in the Quality of life as assessed with the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36; Greek version 1.0; Pappa, Kontodimopoulos & Niakas, 2005)
Change in levels of QoL from baseline through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in insomnia as assessed with the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS; Soldatos, Digeos, Paparrigopoulos, 2000)
Change in insomnia from baseline through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in the levels of psychological distress as assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)
Changes in the levels of psychological distress from baseline through study completion, an average of 1 year
Other Outcomes (6)
Changes in the levels of pain acceptance as assessed via the Greek Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (G-CPAQ; Vasiliou, Karekla, Michaelides, & Kasinopoulos, under review)
Changes in pain acceptance from baseline through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in avoidance of pain levels as assessed via the Greek version of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (G-PIPS-II; Vasiliou, Karekla, Michaelides, & Kasinopoulos, in preparation; Wicksell, Lekander, Sorjonen & Olsson, 2010)
Changes in pain avoidance from baseline through study completion, an average of 1 year
Changes in experiential avoidance as assessed via the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire- Greek version (AAQ-II; Karekla & Michaelides, under review)
Changes in experiential avoidance from baseline through study completion, an average of 1 year
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ACT-based intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe Acceptance and Commitment Therapy + MTAU consists of an unpublished manual developed for the purposes of the project (Karekla et al., 2013). The 8, 90-min weekly group sessions focus in fostering psychological flexibility or the capacity to engage or change behaviors based on what a situation affords and an individual's goals, needs, and desires (Hayes et al., 2004). The ACT protocol involves helping patients to engage in values-based behaviors while remain in contact with pain, especially, when efforts to control or reduce it fail or contribute to suffering.
CBT-based intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Cognitive Behavioral group + MTAU consists of an unpublished manual developed by Kalantzi-Azizi \& Karademas (2003). It includes 8, 90-min weekly group session and primarily focuses on teaching patients to manage their pain by utilizing various techniques, such as activity pacing, muscle relaxation(i.e., progressive muscle relaxation, diaphragmatic breathing, guided imagery), pain recording, thought challenging, problem solving skills, relapse prevention, etc. The CBT protocol involves helping patients to learn to control their pain and to modify dysfunctional thoughts that accompany it.
Interventions
Treatment sessions will be conducted weekly by two co-therapists in groups of approximately 8-10 participants for 1 ½ hours. Although each session has specific objectives, therapists within the time frame, are encouraged to accommodate participants' discussion or other group dynamic issues that may arise. Participants will receive their AP-ACT handbook including outlines of each session, activity plan assignments, and a CD with recorded mindfulness exercises. Session highlights and AP-ACT activities relevant to each session will be given at each meeting, so that participants will follow along with the treatment protocol. Individuals missing more than two consecutive sessions will be considered as dropouts.
Treatment sessions will be conducted weekly by two co-therapists in groups of approximately 8-10 participants for 1 ½ hours. Although each session has specific objectives, therapists within the time frame, are encouraged to accommodate participants' discussion or other group dynamic issues that may arise. Participants will receive their AP-CBT handbook including outlines of each session, activity plan assignments, and a CD with recorded relaxation exercises. Session highlights and AP-CBT activities relevant to each session will be given at each meeting, so that participants will follow along with the treatment protocol. Individuals missing more than two consecutive sessions will be considered as dropouts.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presentation of chronic pain episodes
- Significant impact of the chronic pain condition on quality of life
- Having a medical diagnosis of chronic pain
- Stable medical treatment for at least 2 months
- Reading ability sufficient to comprehend self-monitoring forms as well as competence in the Greek language
You may not qualify if:
- An active non pharmacologically-controlled psychotic spectrum condition or manic episode, suicidal ideation/ intent or substance use problems within the 6 months prior to recruitment
- Having a severe medical condition in the present (e.g. cancer)
- No significant cognitive impairment, as assessed using the Mini-mental Status Examination (MMSE).
- Age under 18 or above 70 years
- Receiving any other psychological intervention which is based on CBT
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Cypruslead
- University of Cretecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Crete
Rethymno, Crete, 74 100, Greece
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Licensed Clinical Psychologist, Assistant Professor, Peer reviewed ACT trainer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2016
First Posted
May 20, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Data will be available upon request and after the sponsor's permission.