Study Stopped
The study device is not working, and there is no funding available to purchase or rent a new one.
3D Ultrasound-guided Labor Epidural Analgesia in the Morbid Obese Parturient
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will be a randomized control study, with the objective to evaluate epidural analgesia success rates between the two methods (Blind Approach versus Accuro Device).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 11, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 11, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 17, 2026
CompletedFebruary 17, 2026
February 1, 2026
5.9 years
January 2, 2018
March 17, 2025
February 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of Needle Insertion Attempts Calculated Across All Participants
An epidural insertion attempt will be defined as advancement of the needle in an effort to enter the epidural space; a needle requiring withdrawal for redirection or reinsertion through the skin/another skin puncture will be counted as an additional attempt.
Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
Number of Participants With Successful Epidural Catheter Placements
Number of Participants With Successful Epidural Catheter Placements.
Within first 90 minutes following catheter placement
Number of Needle Insertion Redirections Calculated Across All Participants
An epidural insertion attempt will be defined as advancement of the needle in an effort to enter the epidural space; a needle requiring withdrawal for redirection or reinsertion through the skin/another skin puncture will be counted as an additional attempt.
Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Procedural Difficulty Rated by the Performing Anesthesiologist on a 10-point Likert Scale
Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
Needle Depth
Beginning of needle insertion till catheter placement-15 minutes
Pressure Pain Thresholds
Before epidural placement
Number of Complications Recorded Calculated Across All Participants
Within 30 days of admission
Study Arms (2)
Palpation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group (Group 2: Epidural) will receive the 'Blind/standard approach', which is the current standard of care using palpation in administering labor epidural analgesia. Additionally, an anesthesiologist will scan patient's back with Accuro device in turn off mode.
Rivanna Accuro 3D Ultrasound Device
EXPERIMENTALThe treatment group (Group 1: Ultrasound and Epidural) will receive epidural analgesia using ultrasound pre-procedural scan with the ACCURO device.
Interventions
The treatment group (Group 1: Ultrasound and Epidural) will receive epidural analgesia using ultrasound pre-procedural scan with the ACCURO device
The control group (Group 2: Epidural) will receive the 'Blind approach/palpation', which is using palpation in administering labor epidural analgesia. Additionally, anesthesiologist will scan patient's back with Accuro device in turned off mode
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I, II, or III.
- Term pregnancy.
- Requesting epidural analgesia for anticipated vaginal delivery.
- BMI\>or = 40.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication for epidural analgesia
- Inability to adequately understand the consent form.
- Incarcerated patients.
- Patients with known spinal deformities.
- Allergies to ultrasound gel.
- Allergies to local anesthetics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Rovnat Babazade
- Organization
- University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rovnat Babazade, MD
The University of Texas Medical Branch
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2018
First Posted
January 23, 2018
Study Start
February 20, 2018
Primary Completion
January 11, 2024
Study Completion
January 11, 2024
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Results First Posted
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02