Neuropathic Pain in Pregnancy
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This will be the first study to investigate the use of rTMS in the treatment of neuropathic pain in pregnancy. This study will enroll 60 pregnant subjects, age 18-45. All participants will receive treatment as usual. Subjects diagnosed with neuropathic pain will be offered rTMS as a treatment option.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pain
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 19, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 2, 2020
CompletedJune 23, 2021
May 1, 2021
3.3 years
November 13, 2015
June 23, 2020
June 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline Visual Analogue Scale for Pain
100 mm line scale that is subject administered to subjectively rate current pain symptoms. The subject will be instructed to draw a single vertical line that best describes current state. The total score ranges from 0-100 with higher numbers indicating worse outcomes. The VAS will be administered at every subject visit.
Baseline and end of study participation, an average of 194 days
Study Arms (4)
Part A - Neuropathic Pain
OTHERSubjects with a score of ≥ 13 on the painDETECT Questionnaire (PDQ) will be assigned to the Neuropathic Pain group.
Part A - Non-Neuropathic Pain
OTHERSubjects with a score of ≥ 1 or ≤ 12 on the painDETECT Questionnaire (PDQ) will be assigned to the Non-Neuropathic Pain group.
Part A - Control
OTHERSubjects with a score of score = 0 on the painDETECT Questionnaire (PDQ) will be assigned to the Control group.
Part B - rTMS
EXPERIMENTALSubjects from the Neuropathic Pain group will be invited to participate in the Part B rTMS group to receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).
Interventions
This self-report questionnaire consists of 7 questions that address the quality of neuropathic pain syndromes. The first 5 questions ask about the gradation of pain, question 6 asks about the pain course pattern and question 7 asks about radiating pain. There are 4 additional questions (not counted in the total score) which asks the subject to rate their pain now and over the last 4 weeks and to mark on a body chart if there is pain radiating into other parts of the body.
The PCS is a 13-item self-report scale. It asks subjects to reflect on past painful experiences, and to indicate the degree to which they experienced each of 13 thoughts or feelings when experiencing pain, on 5-point scales with the end points (0) not at all and (4) all the time. The PCS yields a total score and three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification, and helplessness.
The 3-item, self-report Pain Intensity assesses how much a person hurts. The first 2 items assess pain intensity over the past 7 days; the last item asks subject to rate pain intensity "right now." The 4-item, self-report Pain Interference measures the consequences of pain on relevant aspects of subject's life. It includes impairment in subject's social, cognitive, emotional, physical, \& recreational activities. It also incorporates items about sleep and enjoyment of life. It assesses pain interference over the past 7 days. The 7-item, self-report Pain Behavior measures behaviors that typically indicate to others that an individual is experiencing pain. Measures include observations (sighing, crying), behaviors (resting, guarding, facial expressions, asking for help), \& verbal reports of pain. It assesses pain interference over the past 7 days. All three scales, derived from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), are not disease specific.
The BDI is a widely used instrument that has been used in both clinical and non-clinical setting measuring depressive symptoms. It is a 21 item questionnaire with 4-5 responses for each question. Responses are coded 0-3 for the 4 point scales. The 5 point scales include an additional 2a and 2b response code. The symptom categories reflect overt behavioral manifestations of depression. The instrument has both a high degree of reliability and validity (Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock \& Erbaugh, 1961).
100 mm line scale that is subject administered to subjectively rate current pain symptoms. The subject will be instructed to draw a single vertical line that best describes current state.
The PGIC gives a global rating of change in symptoms, activities, emotion, and overall quality of life related to the subject's pain condition. This is a self-rated scale. The CGI-I gives a global rating of the improvement/change in the symptoms since the last study visit. This is administered by the MD.
Subjects will undergo daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), defined as Monday through Friday, for a total of 10 consecutive sessions. rTMS will be applied using the NeuroStar TMS Therapy System through a figure-8 coil connected to a magnetic stimulator, which provides a biphasic pulse. The coil is applied to the primary motor cortex, M1, contralateral to the painful side. The optimal stimulus site, motor hot spot, will be determined according to visual detection of muscle twitches, and a resting motor threshold is defined as the minimal intensity necessary to induce at least one visible muscle twitch. An rTMS session consists of 10 trains at 90% intensity of resting motor threshold (one train, 100 pulses at 10 Hz; intertrain interval, 50s).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18-45 years old,
- ability to give informed consent,
- viable pregnancy, and
- enrollment prior or equal to 24 weeks gestation
You may not qualify if:
- Active or history of substance use disorder within the past year
- Non-English speaking
- Part B
- Subjects enrolled in Part A and willing to consent to Part B of this protocol
- Pregnant with current chronic neuropathic pain
- Subjects failed treatment with amitriptyline or nortriptyline as defined by one of the following:
- no clinical improvement following a 4-week trial of amitriptyline or nortriptyline (i.e., CGI-I score ≥4)
- an inability to tolerate the medication (i.e., side effects)
- Subjects must pass the TMS Safety Checklist Adult Safety Screen (TASS).
- Subjects should be off medication, which can lower seizure thresholds (e.g., amitriptyline and nortriptyline) for at least two weeks prior to study entry.
- Subjects with neuropathic pain including those with diagnosis of spinal cord injury, fibromyalgia, compression neuropathies (including diabetic peripheral neuropathy), post stroke pain, and multiple sclerosis
- Subjects with a baseline VAS score greater than 30
- Current or past history of a seizure disorder (e.g., epilepsy)
- Current history of preeclampsia
- Current or history of brain lesions (e.g., aneurysm)
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Arkansas For Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Early termination due to inability to enroll pregnant subjects into the TMS intervention portion (Part B) of the study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Shona Ray-Griffith
- Organization
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shona L Ray-Grififth, MD
University of Arkansas
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2015
First Posted
November 18, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 19, 2019
Study Completion
April 19, 2019
Last Updated
June 23, 2021
Results First Posted
September 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share