Neck Exercises in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders
Effectiveness of Neck Motor Control Exercises in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
113
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a common reason to seek medical treatment. Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are MSK disorders that affect the masticatory muscles, the temporomandibular joint, and related structures in the neck and head. Current research showed that people with chronic TMDs have structural and functional brain changes that may contribute to chronic pain development and maintenance. Therapeutic exercise is a central component in treating chronic MSK conditions. New therapies, including exercise, appear to have potential in targeting cortical changes to improve clinical outcomes. However, mechanisms of action are not well understood, and evidence is limited to a few weak studies and specific populations. Evidence from our research group highlights neck exercise as potentially useful in treating TMDs. However, we do not yet know how the brains of women with TMD respond to specific exercise and whether these changes relate to decreased pain, improved function, and quality of life. Evidence linking brain plasticity, pain modulation, and exercise therapy is currently limited, and non-existent for people with TMDs. Objectives: In women with chronic TMD pain, we will:1) determine the impact of motor control training using visual feedback (MCTF) on clinical outcomes such as pain intensity and jaw disability, 2) assess the impact of MCTF on brain structure, using diffusion tensor imaging, 3) assess the impact of MCTF on brain networks, using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging, and 4) determine the effectiveness of MCTF to restore normal muscular structure, performance and fatigability of neck cervical muscles, using electromyographic analysis. Methods: Women with chronic TMD pain will be randomized to either an intervention arm or a placebo control group. Women in the intervention arm will receive 8 weeks of progressive exercise MCTF of the cervical muscles, twice per week. Women in the placebo arm will receive innocuous transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (turn off). Our primary outcomes will be changes in 1) pain, measured with the Visual Analogue Scale, 2) brain structure and networks, measured by fractional anisotropy (brain structure) and the blood-oxygen-level dependent signal (brain networks). Outcomes will be measured at baseline, after 8 weeks of treatment, and 4 months after treatment ends. Results will directly inform and guide clinicians in prescribing more effective interventions for women with TMD
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 17, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2024
CompletedNovember 18, 2025
November 1, 2025
6.9 years
January 3, 2018
November 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain Intensity measured with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The VAS is a linear scale 10 cm in length, labeled with the two extremes boundaries of pain sensation: "no pain", at one end and "worst pain imaginable" at the other end. The validity and reliability of these methods for determining pain intensity, has been reported and confirmed in the literature
Change from baseline at 2 months ( change from baseline at 6 months )
Fractional Anisotropy (FA)
To analyze the DTI images, we will use a method similar to Moayedi et al. To analyze the rsfMRI images, we will use the pipeline outlined in Greicius et al.in addition to applying functional connectivity (graphical modelling) as previously used in our lab. Images will be imported into the software library (FSL v. 4.1.8) of the Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB). Preprocessing will include current and motion artifact correction using the FMRIB Diffusion Toolbox v. 2.0. The DTI images will be processed through 2 different pipelines for 1) voxel-wise analysis and 2) tractography. The preprocessed images will be fit with a diffusion tensor model using DTIFIT in the FDT. We then will calculate voxel-wise values of FA. The rsfMRI images will be analyzed using an ICA approach to isolate the DMN and the sensorimotor network and a functional connectivity approach using graphical modelling to assess the neural networks associated with TMD treatment.
Change from baseline at 2 months (change from baseline at 6 months (if budget allows))
functional brain networks
To analyze the DTI images, we will use a method similar to Moayedi et al. To analyze the rsfMRI images, we will use the pipeline outlined in Greicius et al.in addition to applying functional connectivity (graphical modelling) as previously used in our lab. Images will be imported into the software library (FSL v. 4.1.8) of the Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB). Preprocessing will include current and motion artifact correction using the FMRIB Diffusion Toolbox v. 2.0. The DTI images will be processed through 2 different pipelines for 1) voxel-wise analysis and 2) tractography. The preprocessed images will be fit with a diffusion tensor model using DTIFIT in the FDT. We then will calculate voxel-wise values of FA. The rsfMRI images will be analyzed using an ICA approach to isolate the DMN and the sensorimotor network and a functional connectivity approach using graphical modelling to assess the neural networks associated with TMD treatment.
Change from baseline at 2 months (change from baseline at 6 months (if budget allows))
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Jaw function
Change from baseline at 2 months ( change from baseline at 6 months )
Neck Flexor Endurance Test
Change from baseline at 2 months ( change from baseline at 6 months )
Neck Extensor Endurance Test:
Change from baseline at 2 months ( change from baseline at 6 months )
Craniocervical Flexion Test (CCFT)
Change from baseline at 2 months ( change from baseline at 6 months )
Global Rating Scale (GRS)
Change from baseline at 2 months ( change from baseline at 6 months )
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Exercises
EXPERIMENTALNeck flexors Training: Each patient will initially perform cranio-cervical flexion to sequentially reach 5 pressure targets in 2 mmHg increments from a baseline of 20 mmHg to the final level of 30 mmHg. For each target level, the contraction duration will be increased to 10 s, and the participant trained to perform 10 repetitions with brief rest periods between each contraction. Once one set of 10 repetitions of 10 s is achieved at one target level, the exercise will be progressed to train at the next target level up to the final target. Neck extensors training: Patients will perform cranio-cervical extension and upper cervical rotation in a prone on elbows position while maintaining the cervical spine in a neutral position, progressing to a 4-pt kneeling position.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe placebo group will receive placebo TENS (switched-off TENS apparatus with no perceptible stimulation). Four electrodes, 50 x 35 mm, will be placed on the neck muscles. The participant will be informed that this therapy is called a "subthreshold current" and they might not be able to feel any sensation underneath the electrodes during the treatment. The placebo treatment will be for 30 min twice a week for 8 weeks, as for the intervention group.
Interventions
The treatment will consist of an 8-week progressive exercise program of neck flexors and extensors exercises supervised by a physical therapist for 30-45 min twice a week per 8 weeks as described in Arm/group descriptions.
The placebo treatment will be for 30-45 min twice a week for 8 weeks, as for the intervention group. ( see details in arm description)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- females 18-60 years of age (TMDs are more prevalent in females);
- diagnosed with muscle pain disorders as classified by the new Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) or mixed TMD;
- have had pain in the masticatory muscle for at least 3 months;
- have chronic masticatory muscle pain not attributable to recent acute trauma, previous infection, or active inflammation; and
- have a moderate or severe baseline pain score of 30 mm or greater using a 100 mm VAS.
You may not qualify if:
- metabolic, rheumatoid, or vascular diseases;
- commonly comorbid functional chronic pain disorders (e.g., irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia);
- psychiatric disorders (e.g., depression, schizophrenia);
- abnormal neurological examination;
- contraindication for MRI scanning (e.g., metallic surgical implant);
- self-report of substance abuse;
- exercise therapy in the 6 months before entry into the study or current treatment for TMD;
- previous experience with electrotherapy; or
- pregnant or planning a pregnancy.
- After confirming eligibility to participate in the study, all participants will be asked to sign an informed consent in accordance with the UofA´s policies on research using human participants.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Corbett Hall-Sports Laboratory
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 0V1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan Armijo-Olivo, PhD
University of Alberta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients (reporting one of the main outcome for this study - pain) will be unaware of the hypothesis of this study and performance biases will be avoided by telling them that both treatment options have similar effectiveness. Assessors (measuring clinician assessed tests) and Statistician will be blinded to hypothesis and group allocation following established guidelines.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2018
First Posted
January 19, 2018
Study Start
January 17, 2018
Primary Completion
December 20, 2024
Study Completion
December 20, 2024
Last Updated
November 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11