NCT04098952

Brief Summary

To know the short-term effects of electric massage applied on the cervical region combined with local techniques on the temporomandibular joint versus an intervention that applies only local techniques in subjects diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 23, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 18, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 18, 2019

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 14, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 9, 2021

Status Verified

November 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

June 10, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 7, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

temporomandibular disorderselectric massagetemporomandibular jointlocal techniques

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Changes in the assessment of the maximum amplitude of the vertical opening of the mouth:

    The maximum vertical opening of the mouth was measured using a manual gauge. The measurements were taken with the subjects placed in the supine position on the stretcher, with the head resting on it, the cervical spine in a neutral position, knees slightly bent and the upper limbs extended along the body. In this position, we ask participants to open their mouths as much as possible without causing pain. In this way, we obtain the measurement in millimeters the distance between the upper and lower central incisors.

    Immediately after the intervention as well as 4 weeks after the intervention.

  • Changes in the assessment of pain intensity: VAS

    To measure pain, the visual analog scale (VAS) has been used. The VAS scale is an instrument used very often to quantify the intensity of pain. The accuracy and validity of the EVA scale as a measure of pain has been demonstrated previously. Participants were asked to indicate the degree of pain intensity in response to manual palpation of the central trigger point of the masseter bilaterally using a 10 cm analogue visual scale where 0 corresponds to "no pain" and 10 to "worst pain" that you can imagine. " When performing the post-treatment assessment, a period of 1 minute of rest was left to prevent the change of position from influencing the data obtained, especially in the displacements of the pressure center.

    Immediately after the intervention as well as 4 weeks after the intervention.

  • Changes in the valuation of pain threshold to pressure.

    To measure the pain threshold to the pressure in muscle trigger points, a manual algometer with 1 cm2 of contact area was used. The algometer serves to record the minimum amount of pressure needed for the sensation of pressure to change to a sensation of pain. When this moment arrives, the subject will say "already" and the algometer immediately withdrawn, the pressure being recorded. The results obtained will be expressed in kg / cm2 (1,8). The muscles assessed were masseter and superior trapezius, both bilaterally in the supine position. The pressure in both must be done in a direction perpendicular to the muscle fibers. In the case of the upper trapezius, the algometer will be placed on the trigger point 1 described by Travell and Simons (9). In the masseter, the pressure perpendicular to the algometer will be applied on the central trigger point of the superficial portion of said muscle as described by Travell.

    Immediately after the intervention as well as 4 weeks after the intervention.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in the assessment of cervical range of motion.

    Immediately after the intervention as well as 4 weeks after the intervention.

Study Arms (2)

Group 1: Manual Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The treatment techniques used will be: ischemic compression in the trigger point of the masseter and soft-tissue release technique over the temporal region.

Other: Group 1: Manual Therapy

Group 2: Interferential massage plus Manual Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

In addition to the treatment techniques applied to the other group, an electric massage will be performed with interferential currents at the level of the cervical region.

Other: Group 2: Interferential massage plus Manual Therapy

Interventions

The treatment techniques used will be: ischemic compression in the trigger point of the masseter and soft-tissue release technique over the temporal region.

Group 1: Manual Therapy

In addition to the treatment techniques applied to the other group, an electric massage will be performed with interferential currents at the level of the cervical region.

Group 2: Interferential massage plus Manual Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Consent of the subject to participate in the study.
  • A primary diagnosis of myofascial pain according to Axis I, category Ia and Ib (i.e. myofascial pain with or without limited opening) of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC ⁄ TMD) (Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for tempormandibular disorders (DC(TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD consortium network\* and orofacial pain special interest group. J Oral facial pain headache. 2014;28(1):6-27").
  • Bilateral pain involving the masseter and temporal regions; presence of at least one trigger point (TrP) in the masseter muscle.
  • Pain symptoms history of at least the 3 months previous to the study.
  • Intensity of the pain of at least 30 mm on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
  • A score of less than 45 points on the Personal Psychological Apprehension Scale (PPAS). It has been validated in the scope of physiotherapy, and represents a simple-to-handle tool in studies where subjects may undergo electrotherapy as a treatment option.

You may not qualify if:

  • Surgical intervention of the temporomandibular joints (TMJ).
  • Suffering some intra-articular damage (arthritis) or some vestibular disorder diagnosed.
  • Inflammation of the TMJ.
  • Having received physiotherapy treatment in the last two weeks.
  • Receive pharmacological treatment for analgesic, anti-inflammatory or that could cause alterations of equilibrium.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Luis Espejo Antúnez

Badajoz, 06006, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Espejo-Antunez L, Cardero-Duran MLA, Heredia-Rizo AM, Casuso-Holgado MJ, Albornoz-Cabello M. Effects of adding electro-massage to manual therapy for the treatment of individuals with myofascial temporomandibular pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2024 Sep 16;32:e20240109. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0109. eCollection 2024.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Interventions

Musculoskeletal Manipulations

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Craniomandibular DisordersMandibular DiseasesJaw DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesJoint DiseasesMuscular DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Complementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Luis Espejo Antúnez, PhD

    Department of Medical Surgical Therapy.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Department of Medical Surgical Therapy.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2019

First Posted

September 23, 2019

Study Start

November 18, 2019

Primary Completion

November 18, 2019

Study Completion

October 14, 2021

Last Updated

November 9, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Locations