Reporting Patient Generated Health Data and Patient Reported Outcomes With Health Information Technology
Engaging Disadvantaged Patients in Sharing Patient Generated Health Data and Patient Reported Outcomes Through Health Information Technology
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will assess the feasibility of using patient-centered, commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) health information technology (IT) solutions to collect patient generated health data (PGHD) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from diverse, low-income disadvantaged populations. These data will then be mapped and reported in a way that will allow them to be made actionable and used to improve health care quality and delivery. The data mapping will be designed for data collection through technology such as mobile apps and wearables, and will be intended to support integration into interoperable electronic health records (EHRs), clinical information systems, and big data infrastructures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity
Started Nov 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 26, 2022
CompletedSeptember 26, 2022
September 1, 2022
9 months
December 14, 2017
January 16, 2021
September 6, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Engagement (Patient Activation Measure)
Patient Engagement will be measured by participant performance on the Patient Activation Measurement (PAM)-13 tool. This validated instrument helps to show patients' motivation for being an active participant in managing their health. Each of the 13 items on the tool is rated on a four-point per-item scale, then converted to a total PAM score. The total PAM score is transformed into a scale score with values that range from 0 to 100 based on the calibration tables for the instrument, with higher numbers reflecting better scores and indicative of increased engagement. The scale score is reported here.
Baseline, Post-Intervention
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Weight Loss
16 weeks
Healthy Days HRQOL-4 Measure
16 weeks
Healthy Days Symptoms Measure
16 weeks
Number of Patients Who Responded to Text Messages
16 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALIntervention patients will engage in a 16-week program where they will receive regular health promotion messaging about (a) food, nutrition, and diet; and (b) exercise and physical activity. Intervention patients will be asked to track patient generated health data (PGHD) elements related to weight management through a mobile health app loaded on their phones and/or through using a fitness tracker, depending on patient preference, and to share that information with the research team. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures will be collected pre-and-post-intervention. Intervention patients will also be asked to provide answers to patient-reported outcomes measures on a weekly basis.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl patients will engage in a 16-week program where they will receive regular health promotion messaging about (a) food, nutrition, and diet; and (b) exercise and physical activity. Patient-reported outcomes measures will be collected pre-and-post-intervention.
Interventions
16-week program where patients will receive regular health promotion messaging about (a) food, nutrition, and diet; and (b) exercise and physical activity.
Intervention patients will be asked to track patient generated health data and patient reported outcomes. PGHD elements related to weight management will be collected through a mobile health app loaded on their phones and/or through using a fitness tracker, depending on patient preference, and to share that information with the research team. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures will be collected pre-and-post-intervention. Intervention patients will also be asked to provide answers to patient-reported outcomes measures on a weekly basis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI of 25.0-39.9,
- Has a smartphone
- English or Spanish as primary language
- assessed at "medium health risk" according a risk stratification algorithm based on clinical criteria, diagnostic scoring, and health care utilization
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Susan L. Moore, PhD, MSPH
- Organization
- Colorado School of Public Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan L Moore, PhD, MSPH
Colorado School of Public Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Director, mHealth Impact Lab
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2017
First Posted
December 29, 2017
Study Start
November 2, 2018
Primary Completion
July 19, 2019
Study Completion
August 31, 2020
Last Updated
September 26, 2022
Results First Posted
September 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
An enhanced entity-relationship (EER) model will be created for the PGHD elements and PROMs used in the study. Knowledge representation techniques will be utilized to describe the model in ontological terms. Concepts from the UMLS Metathesaurus will be used to create a mapping to the SNOMED-CT clinical vocabulary. Modeled information will be structured using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resource (FHIR) standards and packaged as a set of FHIR resources. Each FHIR resource includes: 1) common definitions and representations; 2) a common metadata set; and 3) a human-readable part to aid user interpretation. Products will include a detailed EER schema, an interface and requirements assessment, an ontology, and a list of UMLS concepts and SNOMED-CT terms used in ontology mapping.