Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versu Surgical Aortix Valve Replacement for Treating Elderly Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annuli: A Prospective Randomized Study The VIVA Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To date, no formal, randomized, prospective, head-to-head comparisons of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been undertaken in the severe aortic stenosis (AS) population with small aortic annuli. Objectives of the present study are to compare the hemodynamic performance (incidence of severe PPM and ≥ moderate AR) and clinical outcomes (death, stroke, major or life threatening bleeding) between TAVR and SAVR in patients with severe AS and small aortic annuli.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2027
ExpectedMarch 27, 2026
March 1, 2026
6.2 years
June 28, 2017
March 23, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Valve performance: rate of prothesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and/or aortic regurgitation (AR)
Severe PPM \[defined as an indexed aortic valve area ≤0.65 cm2/m2 \] and/or ≥moderate AR \[Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) definition\].
60 days
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Rate of PPM
60 days, 1 year and 5 years
Rate of AR
60 days, 1 year and 5 years
Combined endpoints: rate of AR or PPM
1 year and 5 years
Transvalvular gradient
60 days, 1 year and 5 years
Combined endpoints: LVEF and LV
60 days, 1 year and 5 years
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
TAVR
OTHERThe TAVR procedure will be performed following the standards of each participating center. No restriction or specific recommendation will be given regarding the approach, general vs. local abesthesia, Imaging guidance during the TAVR procedure, and post-procedural TAVR management.
SAVR
OTHERSAVR procedure will be performed using standard techniques, with no limitation in terms of type and size of the valve prosthesis or surgical procedure (e.g. enlargement of the aortic root).
Interventions
The TAVR procedure will be performed with the Edwards SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3 valve (20, 23 or 26 mm).
The TAVR procedure will be performed with the CoreValve Evolut R valve system (23 or 26 mm).
The choice of the type and size of valve, utilization of additional procedures such as root enlargement will be left at the discretion of heart team of the treating the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients ≥65 years-old diagnosed with severe AS (defined as: jet velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s or mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg or velocity ratio \<0.25 AND aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm2 or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2; OR mean gradient \>30 mmHg AND aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm2 or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2 AND \>1200 Agatston units for women or \>2000 Agatston units for men as determined by non-contrast CT).
- Small aortic annulus defined as a mean aortic annulus diameters ˂23 mm and a minimal aortic annulus diameter of ≤21.5 mm as measured by 3D-computed tomography (CT) and/or 3D-transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
You may not qualify if:
- Prohibitive surgical risk as determined by the Heart Team
- Porcelain aorta
- Aortic root dilatation \>45 mm
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) not treatable by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or SYNTAX score \>32 (in the absence of prior revascularization) or severe left main disease
- Non-calcific aortic stenosis
- Severe mitral regurgitation
- Moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation requiring surgical repair
- Prior surgical valve in aortic position
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IUCPQ
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Rodes-Cabau J, Ribeiro HB, Mohammadi S, Serra V, Al-Atassi T, Iniguez A, Vilalta V, Nombela-Franco L, Saez de Ibarra Sanchez JI, Auffret V, Forcillo J, Conradi L, Urena M, Moris C, Munoz-Garcia A, Paradis JM, Dumont E, Kalavrouziotis D, Maria Pomerantzeff P, Rosa VEE, Pezzute Lopes M, Sureda C, Diaz VAJ, Giuliani C, Avvedimento M, Pelletier-Beaumont E, Pibarot P; VIVA (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Treating Elderly Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annuli) Trial Investigators. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2024 Feb 27;149(9):644-655. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067326. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
PMID: 37883682DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2017
First Posted
December 26, 2017
Study Start
August 8, 2017
Primary Completion
October 30, 2023
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2027
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share